I thought Apple actually had quite a large cash balance at the moment...Apple, not exactly rolling in cash, isn't going to highball that estimate.
How much do Apple make on Macs vs iPods? I think that the revenue is slightly higher on Macs...For the real reason behind the switch, you have to look to the fact that it's the iPod and iTMSnot the Macthat are now driving Apple's revenues and stock price.
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha...The cold, hard reality here is that the Mac is Apple's past and the iPod is Apple's future.
I have to agree. First off, we have to keep in mind that the article is not news; it is an editorial and is represented as such. Therefore, its primary function is to express an opinion and to record events. Jon Stokes is entitled to his opinion. He is clearly not a fan of Steve Jobs. Stokes gives himself away when he tries to make the clones out to be victims in Apple's diabolical schemes. From what I read in the article, Stokes accuses Jobs of behaving like darned near every other large buyer.Mitthrawnuruodo said:...
This has to one of the more stupid articles I've read (about Apple) in quite a while... what a waste of air this guy is...
Mitthrawnuruodo said:This quote made me jump: I thought Apple actually had quite a large cash balance at the moment...
And this one is just plain stupid: How much do Apple make on Macs vs iPods? I think that the revenue is slightly higher on Macs...
This has to one of the more stupid articles I've read (about Apple) in quite a while... what a waste of air this guy is...
cube said:Wrong. The real reason is that Apple wants to snatch the personal computer market by selling machines that can also boot Windows, while being the only ones that are able to run OSX.
From Q2 2005:TIGERmac said:In the last quarter, the company collected more revenue from iPod sales than from sales of Macintosh computers. While margins are probably greater on Mac sales, iPod sales outnumber the Mac 4:1.
Q3 2005 results will be released in just two days, then you might be right...- Mac 62% of total revenue. Up 27%.
- Music Business - 38% of total Apple revenue.
cube said:Wrong. The real reason is that Apple wants to snatch the personal computer market by selling machines that can also boot Windows, while being the only ones that are able to run OSX.
Lacero said:I highly doubt Intel will be bullied by Apple, like Apple did with Motorola and IBM. Whatever the circumstances for the switch to Intel, Apple finally did the right thing.
cube said:Wrong. The real reason is that Apple wants to snatch the personal computer market by selling machines that can also boot Windows, while being the only ones that are able to run OSX.
IBM can deliver now (well, soon... theoretically), but what about the future? Remember, there are new PowerPC products coming out before the Intel switch, and the PowerMacs will probably be the last to go, so we may still see these in the Towers, and possibly even in the iMacs. If IBM can actually deliever them. But what about what comes next? Intel's future must hold something better than just a Pentium Mobile. I doubt you will see a current P4 in any Apple machine, there must be something better coming.psycho bob said:If IBM truly can deliver the newly announced 970 models then SJ's arguements go out of the window.
TIGERmac said:In its 10-Q filing to the SEC, Apple reported cash (and cash equivalents) of $2.25 billion dollars. While this is certainly a respectable figure, it isn't extraordinary for a company this size.
solvs said:IBM can deliver now (well, soon... theoretically), but what about the future? Remember, there are new PowerPC products coming out before the Intel switch, and the PowerMacs will probably be the last to go, so we may still see these in the Towers, and possibly even in the iMacs. If IBM can actually deliever them. But what about what comes next? Intel's future must hold something better than just a Pentium Mobile. I doubt you will see a current P4 in any Apple machine, there must be something better coming.
As far as the article is concerned, he has updated it slightly to better clarify. Don't worry, the Mac isn't going anywhere, and the tail end of the article, even with the changes, was all speculation. The iPod is only part of the overal picture. Something to get people interested in Macs before they really go all out. We've been waiting for the day Apple drops the bomb and really starts going after people. That day is coming, soon. This is only the beginning. When we start to see some more advertisements, then we will know it's time. Baby steps people, he's learned some of his lessons, and isn't going to make the same mistakes.
Though the ego thing, for better or worse, is still intact.
Lacero said:I highly doubt Intel will be bullied by Apple, like Apple did with Motorola and IBM. Whatever the circumstances for the switch to Intel, Apple finally did the right thing.