PDA

View Full Version : Judge OKs Microsoft settlement


Shrek
Nov 1, 2002, 07:41 PM
http://money.cnn.com/2002/11/01/technology/microsoft_remedy/index.htm (http://money.cnn.com/2002/11/01/technology/microsoft_remedy/index.htm)

Judge OKs Microsoft settlement
A federal judge mostly approves deal between software maker and DOJ; shares rally.
November 1, 2002: 5:41 PM EST

WASHINGTON (AP) - A federal judge on Friday approved most of the provisions of an antitrust settlement between Microsoft Corp. and the Justice Department, largely setting aside concerns by some states that the sanctions were too light on the software titan.

The sanctions are to last for at least five years unless extended by the court, the judge said.

The approved settlement requires Microsoft to disclose some sensitive technology to its rivals months earlier than the company and the Justice Department had proposed.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote, "The court is satisfied that the parties have reached a settlement which comports with the public interest."

Microsoft said it was reviewing the decision.

"The issues in this case are significant, not only for Microsoft but for the industry and consumers," spokesman Vivek Varma said. "We are committed to resolving these issues in a constructive way so that we can focus on long-term growth and innovation for consumers."

Investors appeared pleased. Shares of Microsoft (MSFT: Research, Estimates) rose $2.30, or 4.3 percent, to $55.30 in after-hours trading following the judge's decision. The stock fell in the regular session.

The judge said the proposed settlement by Microsoft and the Justice Department "adopts a clear and consistent philosophy such that the provisions form a tightly woven fabric."

The decision eliminates the establishment of a technical committee to assess Microsoft's compliance with the agreement. In its place, a corporate compliance committee -- consisting of Microsoft board members -- will make sure Microsoft lives up to the deal, the judge said.

Appeals are likely in a complicated case that has already lasted four years.

"It might not be resolved for another two years," University of Baltimore law professor Robert Lande said. "No one should count their winnings yet."
For more expert opinion click here

Microsoft was found to have violated antitrust laws, illegally maintaining its monopoly over computer software operating systems by strong-arming competitors. But an appeals court threw out a previous order that would break the company in two, leaving Kollar-Kotelly to decide how Microsoft should be punished.

The settlement would prevent Microsoft from participating in exclusive deals that could hurt competitors; require uniform contract terms for computer manufacturers; allow manufacturers and customers to remove icons for some Microsoft features; and require that the company release some technical data so software developers can write programs for Windows that work as well as Microsoft products do.

Justice prosecutors and Microsoft say the deal will immediately benefit consumers. Microsoft has already started complying with the deal by distributing technical data and releasing an update to Windows XP that permits the removal of Microsoft icons.

Some Microsoft competitors, such as Sun Microsystems (SUNW: Research, Estimates), have told the Justice Department that Microsoft's compliance measures aren't adequate. Lawyers for the government and the settling states are investigating those complaints.

The nine states still suing Microsoft, led by Iowa, California and Connecticut, spent two months trying to convince Kollar-Kotelly that those penalties aren't enough to give Microsoft's rivals a fair chance to compete with the software company, whose Windows operating system and productivity software run on over 90 percent of home and business computers.

Those states want Microsoft to divulge more technical information, give computer manufacturers more freedom in how they package Windows in their systems, and allow users to completely remove some Microsoft features from Windows rather than just hide access to them.

Gates said during three days of testimony in the antitrust case that the added penalties would unfairly confiscate Microsoft's intellectual property, cause mass layoffs and force the company's research and development efforts "into a 10-year period of hibernation."

The judge announced her decision just days before national elections. In three of the nine states that agreed to settle the case along with the Justice Department -- Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin -- those attorneys general are running for governor this year, and two more active in the case are running for governor next year, in Kentucky and Louisiana.

In Connecticut, where Richard Blumenthal is one of the most aggressive attorneys general advocating harsher penalties against Microsoft, his re-election opponent accused him Thursday of being "obsessive" in his pursuit of the software maker. Martha Dean, a Republican, praised Microsoft as a successful business and said penalties against it could hurt the state's pension fund and citizens' retirement investments.

Under federal antitrust rules, Kollar-Kotelly does not have authority to change the terms of the settlement. She can approve the deal or reject it, although she can offer suggestions to lawyers to change the proposal in ways that would win her ultimate approval.

Lande predicted that the five-month delay between the hearings and the ruling could be good news for the suing states.

"If all she was going to do was rubber-stamp the settlement between the Department of Justice and Microsoft and say that the states get nothing, she could have done that in two or three months," Lande said. "I think it means the states are going to get something."

Since the federal and state cases are so intertwined and complicated, no one knows just what that something will be. Lande said Kollar-Kotelly's hardest job was to make sure that the settlement order and any added penalties don't send Microsoft mixed signals -- particularly since Microsoft already has indicated that it plans to appeal to the Supreme Court if necessary.

"She wants to be really sure that there's no inconsistencies," Lande said. "Microsoft is going to appeal anyway, but one of the things they would say is that she's being inconsistent."

Before Friday's after-hours gains, Microsoft was down nearly 20 percent year-to-date, but less than the Nasdaq, which has plunged nearly 32 percent. And Microsoft's shares have outperformed the market since it hit its low point on October 9, surging 22 percent compared with a 19 percent gain for the Nasdaq.

:D :D :D YES!!! :D :D :D

springscansing
Nov 1, 2002, 10:20 PM
Kill Martha Dean!

cubist
Nov 1, 2002, 10:29 PM
After millions of dollars spent on proving that Microsoft unquestionably broke the law, all they get is a slap on the wrist. Not even a slap on the wrist. And they'll probably appeal that.

The judge took FIVE MONTHS just to approve the settlement? Either she's completely incompetent, or this is a political payoff.

I guess we consumers will have to get revenge on our own.

Rower_CPU
Nov 2, 2002, 12:29 AM
Don't give up yet...

The 9 states, one of those being California, can still appeal/pursue action on thier own.

It's nice that this mockery of a trial is over...too bad it's not the last time, and definitely not strict enough.

irmongoose
Nov 2, 2002, 01:33 AM
So what? It's just gonna make Windoze a more user-friendly OS right? ************ that's not punishment!! It's just making Windoze better!

:mad: :mad:

I am really counting on the 9 states to finish this thing off. I want this cleared up once and for all, with Microsoft actaully GETTING PUNISHED.

Friggin nutcases... :mad:




irmongoose

Kethoticus
Nov 2, 2002, 04:24 AM
I may be speaking without sufficient evidence, but Proverbs says:

"A bribe is a charm to the one who gives it; wherever he turns, he succeeds."

(17:8)

MrMacMan
Nov 2, 2002, 05:56 PM
Shrek why are you saying yes?
This is one of the WORST possible outcomes, all they get now is the abailty to call them a monopoly under the law.

vniow
Nov 2, 2002, 06:23 PM
This is only the end of one era in computing and the beginning of another.
Linux is attacking the business market and making some movment into the desktop matket, although at a slow, but increasing pace.
Apple has launched a full-on assault with the switch ads, so much that MS actually sees them as a threat, prompting to make one of their own as a rebuttal.

This isn't over. The states can still appeal but no one can predict the outcome at the moment.
What this ruling proves is there are more people disgruntled with MS than ever before and they are beginning to see that there are options.
Things will be tough in the short run, but we can only hope that everything will pan out in the end.

Stelliform
Nov 2, 2002, 09:37 PM
Money Talks. Unfortunately M$ has more than anybody. It is kinda frustrating that the Law is for sale.

Oh well. M$ is getting so greedy that my clients are asking for alternatives now more than ever. (Like what was M$ thinking with software assurance? I have one client that paid for it, and the rest just aren't going to bother with upgrades.)

Anyway, I hope M$ digs its own grave, because the Gov sure isn't going to enforce its laws.

Fukui
Nov 3, 2002, 11:04 AM
Remember, just because O.J Simpson got off free doesn't mean people were convinced he didn't do it, and it certanly didn't make him any more popular...in fact just the opposite.