View Full Version : zeppelin?

Feb 22, 2006, 09:27 PM
i know the beatles arent in itunes, and a lot of people make a big deal over that, but whats with the lack of zeppelin? ive never heard anyone mention this, and IMO they are the 3rd greatest rock and roll band ever (1. being the grateful dead, 2 being the beatles)

so whats the deal with no zep?

Feb 22, 2006, 09:36 PM
This (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=114767) thread throws out a few thoughts on the issue...

Feb 22, 2006, 09:37 PM
so whats the deal with no zep?
They are among a few holdouts for album-only sales.

Feb 22, 2006, 09:44 PM
I've noticed the lack of zeppelin too. If they have such a problem selling singles why don't the bother with selling albums? I've seen plenty of songs only available on album sales, so what's the problem here?

Feb 23, 2006, 02:54 AM
Grateful Dead over the Beatles ... now that's interesting.

Feb 23, 2006, 09:38 AM
I love the ability to download just a song instead of buying a whole album, and rarely do I find artists who make entire albums that I actually like. Fortunately Led Zeppelin is one of these, and if you like any given album I would recommend you just go purchase it (the quality, when you rip it, can be adjusted to be better than if you downloaded the whole album off of iTunes anyway...keep this in mind). If you only want one or two songs I don't know what to tell you.

Feb 23, 2006, 10:20 AM
Computers and iTunes weren't around during their genre, so who cares. Just buy their album on vinyl and bring it in to iTunes, through a long tedious process...

Nevermind, they need to be on iTunes.

If Bonzo were alive, all of Led's music would be there and I would be on a waiting list to see them in concert.

Feb 23, 2006, 10:35 AM
I would be on a waiting list to see them in concert.

And happily spending $200 a ticket. At least I would.. Bonzo ruled. Thankfully we still have Neil Peart and Tim Alexander.