View Full Version : Kodak DCS Pro 14n
cube
Oct 28, 2007, 02:40 PM
I'm still sticking to film because I am waiting for a reasonably priced full frame nikon.
Would you go for such a kludgy camera? Noise seems to be a problem and I don't know what the resolution is at ISO 800.
$800
cube
Oct 28, 2007, 02:55 PM
6 or 3.4 MP at ISO 800. Not bad. But I have no idea how it looks.
cube
Oct 28, 2007, 02:58 PM
No DxO, as expected :(
cube
Oct 28, 2007, 03:52 PM
Can't meter with manual lenses because it is based on F80. Bad. :(
cube
Oct 29, 2007, 07:00 PM
No Aperture support. :(
SILKYPIX works, but it ignores the WB info.
Bibble Pro works.
ACR and Lightroom work.
compuwar
Oct 30, 2007, 02:17 AM
I'm still sticking to film because I am waiting for a reasonably priced full frame nikon.
Would you go for such a kludgy camera? Noise seems to be a problem and I don't know what the resolution is at ISO 800.
$800
I think you'll be waiting a while then. It's a fair studio camera, but I don't think I'd pay $800 for one.
cube
Oct 30, 2007, 02:00 PM
Well, I got it. I was pleasantly surprised, I thought it would be more bulky.
I think it was a good price. It's going for $870-$1500 on ebay.
We'll see how it performs with good light outside, RAW, and postprocessing.
Now to really justify getting this instead of the Sigma 10-20 DC, I would have to buy the Sigma 12-24 (FF).
DamoRed
Nov 3, 2007, 09:06 PM
Absolutely not!
Run a mile, even if it was half the price. Why put money into what is a defunct camera with little or no support? For $800 that is the larger part of a current fully supported camera with far less issues than the 14N.
Damo
cube
Nov 4, 2007, 06:49 AM
Because a current full-frame will cost $5000 for quite a while.
speedyturtle
Nov 13, 2007, 01:38 PM
I have a Kodak DCS SLR Pro 14n for 3 years and a Kodak DCS Pro 14n for 2 years and now they both have the same problem. The LCD screens are black and won't display anything and the pictures aren't going to the memory card.
I have a feeling they're going to be expensive to repair. I've loved using them because of the high resolution but now I don't have a camera to use unless I go back to film. It's very disappointing.
Forced Perfect
Nov 17, 2007, 09:15 AM
Because a current full-frame will cost $5000 for quite a while.
Only $2,199 (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-5D-Digital-Camera/dp/B0007Y791C/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1195308793&sr=8-1). :)
cube
Nov 17, 2007, 09:32 AM
That is Canon.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.