i have a question about pricing points and features between macs and pc's as i'm searching for a notebook.
macs are great and maybe some day they will rule the world. of course, by then there would be revolts against the apple monopoly in favor of Lin-a-Win-a-Tosh the new counter culture operating system. but anyway, every high-end mac is fast, powerful and beautiful, and most computer enthusiasts would love to have one regardless of their operating system affinities.
that being said, they are expensive. for most people, just too damn expensive. the majority of the people i know who own macs are either upper-middle or upper-class, or managed to score a mac on their company tab. whenever i consider the demographics of college kids, for example, the people with high-end macs in their dorm rooms tend to be the same kids who brought a car with them to college, and have multitudes of other neato, techspensive things . it makes me somewhat resentful, of course, because most of those kids, with their powerbooks and 20inch, RAM'ed out imacs and G5s with studio displays, Adobe software suites, etc, have incredibly powerful set-ups, and use them mostly for games, movies, and trying to play rock-star with Garage Band.
the response to my comments above is commonly: "well, those systems you mentioned are Apple's 'pro-line', if you are looking for consumer friendly pricing, then you should be looking at Apple's 'consumer line' of products."
when i look at Apple's consumer line of products, i see a bunch of nice machines- i myself am looking for a notebook, so my attention goes to the ibooks. indeed, they are cheaper than the powerbooks, and have nice features, but, and here's the ping of frustration: "PING!": when you compare these consumer macs to similarly priced pc's, the pc's *seemingly* way out perform them. for example, i work with graphics and layout and prefer to use Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign. on a mac in my price range (a reasonable price range) these excellent software titles can run into trouble, especially when running them simultaneously. however, on a pc in my price range, i don't have these problems. my roommate has a Dell Inspiron, altogether $1600, and working with these same software titles is smooth, fast, and stable. his drive is larger, has more ram, faster cpu, beautiful large screen, fast graphics card- and on top of all that, he enjoys the other benefits of having a windows machine... cheaper ram, cheaper accessories... cheaper all around everything and great performance.
so, it comes down to this, why spend hard earned money for apple's medium-performance consumer machine, when for the same price you can have a high-performance professional machine that runs the the same software, only on a different operating system?
i mentioned the rich kids in school with high-end macs. a friend mentioned that many, many students also use the consumer line, in fact most mac-using students are ibook owners. why would this be? well, talk to those students about why they bought the mac, and you'll find out that appearance is a major factor ("it's so cute!") -apples on campus are almost a fashion item-, and these same kids fear that pc's are too complicated- which is nothing more than a prejudice against older versions of windows. recent windows releases are dummy proof, like the mac OS. ibook popularity may be due to marketing success more than anything else. apples have become cool while pc's have become "common" drab machines of common, drab people, even though both machines do the same things in approximately the same way.
i would love a mac, OSX rocks, the software is great, especially the bundled software, and it's a beautiful machine. it's just seems unjustifiable to buy one when i can get much better performance out of a windows machine for the same, or often less money. can someone please straighten me out on this? it's frustrating at this age when money is tight and every penny counts, but, being a responsible consumer shouldn't depend on income bracket. i'm looking for a well reasoned response, because, well, i *do* want a mac, i'm just trying to figure out why it would be intelligent, at this point, for me to buy one.
apple saw a huge profit margin this year, and they still have such a tiny piece of the market share- it makes sense that this would be the case if they really were, as many people have wondered, overcharging consumers for their machines. it makes me feel like i should just let the rich kids and their parents fund apple, which is what is happening, and be a common person with a commonly priced, commonly designed, high-performance notebook. besides, i could always paint it white
macs are great and maybe some day they will rule the world. of course, by then there would be revolts against the apple monopoly in favor of Lin-a-Win-a-Tosh the new counter culture operating system. but anyway, every high-end mac is fast, powerful and beautiful, and most computer enthusiasts would love to have one regardless of their operating system affinities.
that being said, they are expensive. for most people, just too damn expensive. the majority of the people i know who own macs are either upper-middle or upper-class, or managed to score a mac on their company tab. whenever i consider the demographics of college kids, for example, the people with high-end macs in their dorm rooms tend to be the same kids who brought a car with them to college, and have multitudes of other neato, techspensive things . it makes me somewhat resentful, of course, because most of those kids, with their powerbooks and 20inch, RAM'ed out imacs and G5s with studio displays, Adobe software suites, etc, have incredibly powerful set-ups, and use them mostly for games, movies, and trying to play rock-star with Garage Band.
the response to my comments above is commonly: "well, those systems you mentioned are Apple's 'pro-line', if you are looking for consumer friendly pricing, then you should be looking at Apple's 'consumer line' of products."
when i look at Apple's consumer line of products, i see a bunch of nice machines- i myself am looking for a notebook, so my attention goes to the ibooks. indeed, they are cheaper than the powerbooks, and have nice features, but, and here's the ping of frustration: "PING!": when you compare these consumer macs to similarly priced pc's, the pc's *seemingly* way out perform them. for example, i work with graphics and layout and prefer to use Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign. on a mac in my price range (a reasonable price range) these excellent software titles can run into trouble, especially when running them simultaneously. however, on a pc in my price range, i don't have these problems. my roommate has a Dell Inspiron, altogether $1600, and working with these same software titles is smooth, fast, and stable. his drive is larger, has more ram, faster cpu, beautiful large screen, fast graphics card- and on top of all that, he enjoys the other benefits of having a windows machine... cheaper ram, cheaper accessories... cheaper all around everything and great performance.
so, it comes down to this, why spend hard earned money for apple's medium-performance consumer machine, when for the same price you can have a high-performance professional machine that runs the the same software, only on a different operating system?
i mentioned the rich kids in school with high-end macs. a friend mentioned that many, many students also use the consumer line, in fact most mac-using students are ibook owners. why would this be? well, talk to those students about why they bought the mac, and you'll find out that appearance is a major factor ("it's so cute!") -apples on campus are almost a fashion item-, and these same kids fear that pc's are too complicated- which is nothing more than a prejudice against older versions of windows. recent windows releases are dummy proof, like the mac OS. ibook popularity may be due to marketing success more than anything else. apples have become cool while pc's have become "common" drab machines of common, drab people, even though both machines do the same things in approximately the same way.
i would love a mac, OSX rocks, the software is great, especially the bundled software, and it's a beautiful machine. it's just seems unjustifiable to buy one when i can get much better performance out of a windows machine for the same, or often less money. can someone please straighten me out on this? it's frustrating at this age when money is tight and every penny counts, but, being a responsible consumer shouldn't depend on income bracket. i'm looking for a well reasoned response, because, well, i *do* want a mac, i'm just trying to figure out why it would be intelligent, at this point, for me to buy one.
apple saw a huge profit margin this year, and they still have such a tiny piece of the market share- it makes sense that this would be the case if they really were, as many people have wondered, overcharging consumers for their machines. it makes me feel like i should just let the rich kids and their parents fund apple, which is what is happening, and be a common person with a commonly priced, commonly designed, high-performance notebook. besides, i could always paint it white