http://ladd.dyndns.org/xbench/merge.xhtml?doc1=60941&doc2=62928
an overclocked g4 vs a dual g5
madness
an overclocked g4 vs a dual g5
madness
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
g4vsg5= draw?
- Thread starter Mord
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
QCassidy352
macrumors G5
doesn't seem possible. The G4 is *faster* clock for clock? Even considering the G5 has twice the RAM, faster RAM, better video card, etc? No way.
javabear90
macrumors 6502a
Eek!!! 😱 I seriously doubt this is true. Are you sure that the processor wasn't on reduced mode or sumthin?
I wonder if the program they are using to get those stats is even written for 64 bits, or else the results arnt going to be right.
Jigglelicious
macrumors 6502
This confirms what most people have been saying since before the release of the G5 - while the G5 is a floating point monster, for normal (read: integer) apps, the G4 is faster clock for clock than the G5. This is why waiting for a G5 powerbook is silly. Unless Apple releases a 2GHz+ G5 Powerbook, the current G4 powerbooks would be faster or just as fast as a slow 1.6GHz G5. The only advantage the G5 would have is in floating point heavy apps, such as 3d games and scientific analysis.
Chaszmyr said:
I couldn't agree more. I ran it on my brand new, out of the box PB17 (fresh reboot, no background apps, with all the energy/processor settings correct) and it posted grossly inconsistent scores and continues to do so to this day (and my machine is flawless). I don't understand why people use this as a 'the bible' of mac speed testing. If you're not changing stuff, your machine should give consistent readings within a small range. That says to me there's something bunk about Xbench.