View Full Version : Which is better ATI9600 or FX 5200 Ultra ?
Bob Dobbs
Nov 4, 2004, 11:13 AM
Subject says it all? I just got a factory refurb G5 dual 1.8 - they said on the phone it would have a GeForce FX 5200 Ultra... but system profiler says its got a ATY,RV350 (I think that is exactly) with 64MB.
So should I complain, or is this a mini upgrade?
macrumors12345
Nov 4, 2004, 11:31 AM
rad 9600 is far superior to gfx 5200 ultra. you got lucky.
ChrisFromCanada
Nov 4, 2004, 11:36 AM
Yes the 9600 does indeed bench a little bit better than the FX 5200 U. Are you sure it is a 9600 not a 9600 Pro?
cube
Nov 4, 2004, 11:49 AM
5200 is "ShaderModel 3.0", 9600 is only 2.0, so you might miss out on some games (and maybe eventually in some version of Core Image).
jared_kipe
Nov 4, 2004, 12:04 PM
If it is 64Mb I think thats a normal 9600 non pro. But yes, you got a good deal then, happy you. And just in case you don't ... want such a common ati card, I'll trade you for my dual G5's stock FX 5200 Ultra.;)
Sun Baked
Nov 4, 2004, 12:12 PM
Subject says it all? I just got a factory refurb G5 dual 1.8 - they said on the phone it would have a GeForce FX 5200 Ultra... but system profiler says its got a ATY,RV350 (I think that is exactly) with 64MB.
So should I complain, or is this a mini upgrade?That was the $50 upgrade -- which everyone thought was worth it at the time.
Now they are using the ATI9600 with 128MB on the newer machines.
QCassidy352
Nov 4, 2004, 12:32 PM
you got the 64 MB Radeon 9600 Pro which shipped with the original G5s. The new option is a 128 MB Radeon 9600 XT. But even the older 9600 is much better than the 5200 ultra.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.