Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Former Anobit CEO Discusses Acquisition by Apple, Contrasts Cultures of Apple and Intel
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
They were VERY close to bankruptcy however. Around 90 days away from bankruptcy in fact.
Was playing around with my original iPhone. The difference is night and day. It is not the same phone, unless you are are a kid that demands that every single update have a complete redesign of the UI.
Seriously, loading the facebook app takes at least 20 seconds on the original. iPhone 4S does it instantly.
Sounds good on paper. However, knowing a couple of hardware engineers at Apple I would never even consider working for that sweatshop. 12-14 hour days + weekends without better compensation are a modern form of slavery. Good products, but at the price of its employees.
clever one I must admit!!
seems though that my toilet humor (or simply lack of...) has took a turn for the worse, while pulling along the rest of humanity off-topic.
You might do well to read a book. Some of what you say was true. However, Apple never went bankrupt nor did Apple ever approach bankruptcy. The point, however, where betrayed your unfamiliarity with facts is the $150 million settlement with Microsoft. This sum was 3.75% of Apple's $4 billion in the bank, a drop in the bucket.
I take exception to the slam on Intel. I worked for Intel for 3 years as a marketing manager before I returned to get a Ph.D, and to say that they don't expect excellence out of employees is B.S.
I love the great things that Apple does, but it's not like there is a bunch of crap coming out of Intel. This guy is just taking a shot at a former partner. Intel has always had the reputation of hiring the best and brightest. Maybe Apple is wringing more out of their employees, but Intel is no slouch at innovation and consistent, quality improvement.
I love the great things that Apple does, but it's not like there is a bunch of crap coming out of Intel. This guy is just taking a shot at a former partner. Intel has always had the reputation of hiring the best and brightest. Maybe Apple is wringing more out of their employees, but Intel is no slouch at innovation and consistent, quality improvement.
It is not like they went into the job blind. I am sure that most people know what is expected of them plus they paid quite well to start with.
Are you a Samsung marketing employee? I was reading about a less publicized Samsung marketing tactic the other day. It involves hiring regular forum Trolls to wage a war of attrition against Apple to tarnish their brand.
This is something that should never be said when dealing with a company that has done some major innovations in the markets that it's in.
Same with this. The products Apple helped reinvent were done rather well, but Apple still found room for improvement.
I would put most of the improvements from the ver A model to the current gen up there with the march of technology. We do have faster dual core processors, fantastic SoCs, and a bevy of other improvements. The UI and the overall form of the device has stayed the same.
Now, I agree, there shouldn't be change for change sake, but most devices from the competitors that break away from the norm are changing for the sake of the user experience.
If it weren't for the Microsoft bailout they would have.
I would love to see a link and evidence. (serious).
I wonder what A+ is responsible for iTunes 11. And the swiss railway clock disaster. And you can't fix maps with a dozen A+ people, but you can with 1000 B-.
That's the correct approach for players. But there is tons of work that needs doing, and I think the players are overstretched.
That's nonsense.
Difference is one leads to burn out and once does not.
It could also be said one use the stick for everything and the other use a carrot
The funding from Microsoft was nothing more than a publicity stunt. $150 million when Apple had a couple billion in cash, does not make a "save." At the time Steve took over, Apple's operating costs and product lines were out of control. They were hemorrhaging money and were very close to bankruptcy; the $150 million from Microsoft would've only lasted a week or two.
The Microsoft "deal" consisted of several things and probably were somewhat responsible for helping to save Apple - at least in public perception...
Microsoft would "invest" $150 million in Apple.
They would promise to continue develop Office for Mac.
Apple would drop all patent litigation.
They would both agree to cross-licensing (of current technology) for the next ten years.
What really saved Apple was Steve Jobs trimming off all the fat. Allowing the money they did have to last longer giving them time to refocus, develop new products and get them on the market.
In most ways Microsoft's investment was symbolic and orchestrated by Steve and Bill to help both Apple's image of relevance and Microsoft's image of playing well with others (facing down anti-trust issues at the time). It was also coupled with cross licensing and Office development guarantees. Apple had substantially more money available then the 150m they got from MS ignoring the potential of taking financing. Apple was in bad shape but it had cash on hand, it hand the potential to get more cash (loans), and it could (and very much did) take steps to radically cut costs.
Yeah, after reading a couple articles, the loan was only $150M when they had over a B in the bank at the time. Who know why these things happen. Essentially covered some marketing costs.
Yikes, didn't mean to start that landslide.
Actually Apple is known in the industry for having pretty average pay. It's actually one of the reasons they don't get the "best" people overall. Lower pay, and a culture that is pretty controlling.
Google is known for getting the best engineers. Excellent pay, excellent work environment, and a much more creative and "open" culture.
You can look into this stuff yourself, if you don't believe me.
Are you saying Apple is the KFC of consumer electronics?
Toilet paper?
I don't think it was a slam on Intel - he wasn't saying Intel doesn't hire great people who do great work, just that if you spent a day at Intel doing merely good work you wouldn't be worried about keeping your job. Sounds like working at Apple must be horrible, to be honest!
----------
I'm an Apple fanboy, but I know where I'd rather work! (Not that either of them would hire me, of course!)
I can imagine this being the case.
Still, regardless of their comparative standards, Intel still gets results. They seem to have had a symbiotic relationship with Apple. The latter wanted lower-heat CPUs for their new slim model laptops... bang.