<offtopic>for those needing to convert legacy wordperfect docs, there is a commandline utility available via homebrew called writerperfect that can be wrapped in an automator droplet. we have lots of legacy WP docs, and the reason some loved WP "reveal codes" is the reason I dislike it!</offtopic>
Wow, although Scrivener is not technically a layout processor, you can actually get it to style a document, especially as you can use MMD -> LaTeX to output to professionally typeset documents (Scrivener has a very flexible output engine). After having used Scrivener, I find it hard to imagine how anyone can "write" (that initial outpouring of words) in a word processor, they are simply not designed for writing, but styling!!! All my scientific writing is done in Scrivener (amazing ability to manage source material like raw data and figures, manage PDFs, handle notes / comments / metadata, track revisions structurally per section), and only at the last stage is the near complete manuscript spat out to word. The only thing that Word is still essential for is collaborative writing via track changes. For layout with figures Word has always been terrible, document reflows easily destroy fragile layouts, and Pages or InDesign is much better in that regard.
I also think Mellel is excellent at what it does (multi-lingual academic oriented writing), but it cannot compete with Scrivener for "writing" and cannot compete with Word for compatibility for final output / collaboration. I have a licence but never use it.
Wow, although Scrivener is not technically a layout processor, you can actually get it to style a document, especially as you can use MMD -> LaTeX to output to professionally typeset documents (Scrivener has a very flexible output engine). After having used Scrivener, I find it hard to imagine how anyone can "write" (that initial outpouring of words) in a word processor, they are simply not designed for writing, but styling!!! All my scientific writing is done in Scrivener (amazing ability to manage source material like raw data and figures, manage PDFs, handle notes / comments / metadata, track revisions structurally per section), and only at the last stage is the near complete manuscript spat out to word. The only thing that Word is still essential for is collaborative writing via track changes. For layout with figures Word has always been terrible, document reflows easily destroy fragile layouts, and Pages or InDesign is much better in that regard.
I also think Mellel is excellent at what it does (multi-lingual academic oriented writing), but it cannot compete with Scrivener for "writing" and cannot compete with Word for compatibility for final output / collaboration. I have a licence but never use it.