Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

RevTEG

macrumors 65816
Oct 28, 2012
1,347
1,192
San Jose, Ca
Viber is free alternative. Also Viber has voice calls.

I totally agree. I stopped using Whatsapp over a year ago. Viber my go to app now when I travel internationally. Pop in a local sim, pay for local data and call and text my family from anywhere in the world. Viber is awesome.
 

Vip

macrumors regular
May 8, 2008
180
0
The issue is not $1, but the precedent it sets.

If universally accepted, what next, $1 for maps, $1 for facebook, $1 for twitter

see where we are going...
 

roadbloc

macrumors G3
Aug 24, 2009
8,784
215
UK
Given there are a million free alternatives to this, I'd say they are lucky to be able to sell it for 69p. And in a world where people's contracts come with 5 billion free texts anyway, services like it seem irrelevant unless it is for video chat, someone is out of credit/texts, or for cross-compatibility with PCs.

This can only hurt them.
 

Daniel B

macrumors member
Feb 23, 2010
37
49
Invalid subscription model

Hi,

That kind of subscription model is not allowed according to the to the App Store Review Guidelines:

11.9 Apps containing "rental" content or services that expire after a limited time will be rejected

Daniel
 

Menel

Suspended
Aug 4, 2011
6,351
1,356
Hi,

That kind of subscription model is not allowed according to the to the App Store Review Guidelines:

11.9 Apps containing "rental" content or services that expire after a limited time will be rejected

Daniel

Talkatone works that way...
 

hexonxonx

macrumors 601
Jul 4, 2007
4,610
1
Denver Colorado
I don't know anyone who actually uses this. Everyone I know uses their phones stock texting app.

I did download it on my Nexus 4 simply because it's free and free to use for a year though I don't know anyone to use it with.

I would DL it for my iPhones but as I said above, no one to use it with so why spend the $.99?
 

splinetol

macrumors newbie
May 3, 2013
1
0
It doesnt add up

if i have an iphone, i rather just use fb msging to msg now...wat is watsapp thinking????:confused:
 

neil1980

macrumors 6502
Nov 1, 2008
422
19
I can see this becoming a standard business model at some point.


Free app to build up your user base then after a few years charge a dollar per person per year. People will pay it as lets face it a dollar a year is nothing and hey presto you have a multi million dollar business.

Personally I don't use whatsapp a lot (a couple of contacts use it but thats it) and it doesn't save me any money as I have unlimited SMS and send very few MMS... but I think I'd still prefer $1 a year than to have adverts all over the app. That said I'd be happier still if the contacts that did use it just got an iPhone and used iMessage instead.
 

kolax

macrumors G3
Mar 20, 2007
9,181
115
if i have an iphone, i rather just use fb msging to msg now...wat is watsapp thinking????:confused:

Costs money to put the application into the App Store, it isn't free. Not to mention on going costs of people's time to maintain and update the app.

One off payments don't really make sense for applications like these anymore.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.