Bootcamp is simply a BIOS emulator for EFI installed in the firmware (so not backed up), away of partitioning the drive and a set of drivers for Windows.
However timemachine will back up VM's used with Parallels or Fusion.
I thought it was a bad idea to let it do that as the VM disk file is pretty huge (a few Gb at least) and any time anything changes in that file TimeMachine has to copy the whole thing as it's one big file (not only taking quite a while to copy, but filling up your backup disk very quickly)?
However back to the OP's question, no timemachine can't backup your bootcamp partition because it only runs while OSX is running.
It's true that Time Machine does not back up Windows partitions, but this isn't the reason why (if it were, why couldn't it just be backed up under Mac OS X?).
Time Machine completely ignores NTFS and FAT32 partitions.
You're right, it is a bad idea but it is possible.
That reminds me to exclude those folders from my timemachine back up Thanks!
Hi ,I'm new here..
May I know how to do the configure to exclude the folders from Time Machine backup ?
Thanks a lot
I have BootCamp installed and also use it as my Parallels VM disk. Will TimeMachine back it up as Parallels or ignore it like BootCamp? Thanks very much for the help.
However timemachine will back up VM's used with Parallels or Fusion.
This might be a dead thread, but this sentence is FALSE for certain versions of OS X 10.5 and Fusion. And it may be false MOST of the time. Manually verify that your Virtual Machines are being backed up before relying on it.
They are usually automatically EXCLUDED because they are extremely large, and Time Machine has to re-backup the entire file if even one bit changes.
No, it will not back up your Parallels VM because it uses the Boot Camp Partition
This might be a dead thread, but this sentence is FALSE for certain versions of OS X 10.5 and Fusion. And it may be false MOST of the time. Manually verify that your Virtual Machines are being backed up before relying on it.
They are usually automatically EXCLUDED because they are extremely large, and Time Machine has to re-backup the entire file if even one bit changes.
Actually, no it doesn't, unless you installed Boot Camp and then told Parallels to use that partition. Parallels is perfectly happy setting up it's own virtual machine and storing it's files in a disk image. That will be backed up.
jW
No, OS X and Fusion do not automatically exclude the VM's from backup. Also, both the latest versions of Parallels and of Fusion are designed to work with Time Machine properly, and thus do not require the entire file to be backed up every time.
jW
Fusion 1.1.1 and below excluded the VMs from being backed up.
By what magic do you think Time Machine can work 'properly' with multi-GB files, such that the entire thing doesn't have to be backed up with every change? Is Steve Jobs' Pancreatic Pixie Dust involved?
No need to be a jerk. The VM's are not multi-GB files in reality, they are wrappers around multiple gigabytes of files. Thus, if they properly identify them as such, Time Machine can back up the changes within those VM's without backing up the entire thing again.
jW
By what magic do you think Time Machine can work 'properly' with multi-GB files, such that the entire thing doesn't have to be backed up with every change? Is Steve Jobs' Pancreatic Pixie Dust involved?
No need to be a jerk. The VM's are not multi-GB files in reality, they are wrappers around multiple gigabytes of files. Thus, if they properly identify them as such, Time Machine can back up the changes within those VM's without backing up the entire thing again.
jW
sushi said:Personally, I would want an original, if you will, backup copy of each VM that I have.
That way when the VM that I am using is hosed, I can just delete it and make a new copy from my original backup.
Therefore I would not want TM to incrementally back up my VMs. But that's just me.
Yes, because rsync is willing to examine file contents and evaluate them on a granular basis to find similarities and differences. PocketSoft's .RTPatch product was(and still is) one of the big players in this field for binary patching. Apple should buy them and shrink their updates by 95%.belvdr said:It's not related to TM, but rsync can do this. Check out the '--no-whole-file' option.