Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 20, 2012, 01:33 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Most of Intel's Ivy Bridge CPUs Not Actually Delayed Until June






Last week, a Digitimes report claimed that Intel was going to delay mass availability of its new Ivy Bridge processors until after June. Ivy Bridge represents the next generation processors from Intel and are expected to power any new Macs in the coming few months. The original target date for Ivy Bridge shipments was in April.

VR-Zone now reports that the report wasn't entirely correct and that Intel will only be delaying the release specifically of mobile Dual-Core Ivy Bridge processors.
Quote:
Remember that article from the other day that made some people panic as Intel might've delayed Ivy Bridge to June? Well, there's no need to be worried if you're planning on getting a new desktop system, as none of the desktop parts that were originally meant to launch have been delayed and on the mobile side, only the dual core models have been pushed back.
According to the site, the reason for the delay of those specific processors is due to an overstock of the previous generation chips.

What that means is that it may not have an effect on Apple's release plans for updated MacBook Pros and iMacs. Apple currently offers Quad-Core processors in their iMac, so that product line should see no added delays. The iMac was last updated in May, 2011 and is getting due for a refresh. Meanwhile, in the MacBook Pro line, the 13" model is the only MacBook Pro that currently uses a Dual-Core processor.

As it turns out, we previously reported that Intel's new Quad-Core Ivy Bridge processor will be heat efficient enough to fit in Apple's 13" MacBook chassis for the first time. The limiting factor for a Quad-Core 13" MacBook Pro had previously been the heat output of the processor. If Apple chooses to go this route, they could eliminate Dual-Core processors entirely from their MacBook Pro line, side stepping any delays.

However, this line of reasoning assumes that Apple will not be making any dramatic changes to the MacBook Pro enclosure. Persistent rumors have suggested that Apple may be considering more MacBook Air-like designs for at least some of the new MacBook Pro models. Such a drastic change would change Apple's choice of processors considerably.

It's also worth noting that Apple isn't a typical Intel customer and has, in the past, been able to secure chips earlier than the rest of the industry.

Article Link: Most of Intel's Ivy Bridge CPUs Not Actually Delayed Until June
MacRumors is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 01:36 AM   #2
Liquinn
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Phewwwwww. So they're being released on April 8th as planned? :P
__________________
2011 Mini | 13" (cMBP) + 15" (rMBP 2013) | Powermac G5 | 27" TBD | iPhone 3GS (16GB) | iPad 1 and iPad 4 | iPod touch 4G (64GB) | Apple Wireless Keyboard + Magic Mouse x2 | Magic Trackpad |
Liquinn is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 01:37 AM   #3
Mr. Gates
macrumors 68020
 
Mr. Gates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: --Redmond --------- ----------------Washington---
This

A backlight keyboard

And that ASUS UX31 is Mine !
__________________
This is a RUMOR site For speculation and discussion.Not a Fan-Club. Just because we are interested in Apple rumors it doesn't mean we should be frothing at the mouth with Apple rabid comments.
Mr. Gates is offline   -15 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 01:39 AM   #4
Zwhaler
macrumors 603
 
Zwhaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Pretty cool, now all we need is Sandy Bridge Xeon E -.-
__________________
2x2.93 24GB 25TB 2x1TB 840EVO 2x UAD OCTO, Apollo, 4-710d
Check Out My YouTube Channel~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Zwhaler is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 01:39 AM   #5
Qwaf
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
The iMac was last updated in May, 2010
Huh?
Qwaf is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 01:41 AM   #6
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwaf View Post
Huh?
fixed.

arn
arn is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 01:48 AM   #7
mjuarez
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
It's also worth noting that Apple isn't a typical Intel customer and has, in the past, been able to secure chips earlier than the rest of the industry.
That last one is probably the most important line in the whole article. Who cares what everybody else is getting? I'm pretty sure that, at this point, whatever Apple requires/decides, that's what Intel is doing. They're the only customer that is growing, and the only one that potentially could leave Intel any day now, if they decided to run OS X on their own ARM chips. Intel backwards compatibility might have been an issue 5 years ago, but today, that is becoming less and less important.
mjuarez is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 01:52 AM   #8
Mr. Gates
macrumors 68020
 
Mr. Gates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: --Redmond --------- ----------------Washington---
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjuarez View Post
That last one is probably the most important line in the whole article. Who cares what everybody else is getting? I'm pretty sure that, at this point, whatever Apple requires/decides, that's what Intel is doing. They're the only customer that is growing, and the only one that potentially could leave Intel any day now, if they decided to run OS X on their own ARM chips. Intel backwards compatibility might have been an issue 5 years ago, but today, that is becoming less and less important.
OSX on ARM

Maybe in about 5 more years.
__________________
This is a RUMOR site For speculation and discussion.Not a Fan-Club. Just because we are interested in Apple rumors it doesn't mean we should be frothing at the mouth with Apple rabid comments.
Mr. Gates is offline   -4 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:04 AM   #9
Star Brood
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sacramento, CA
Professional processors out just in time for OS X Twitter.
Star Brood is offline   22 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:04 AM   #10
GBPac12
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: In the heart of every Apple believer.
Hmmmm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Gates View Post
OSX on ARM

Maybe in about 5 more years.
That would be interesting to say the least.
GBPac12 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:13 AM   #11
justperry
macrumors 603
 
justperry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 7 Km South of an active upside down (boat) volcano.
That's good news, another reason not to trust Digitimes.
justperry is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:14 AM   #12
macduke
macrumors 68030
 
macduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Wanted to go 13 last time around, but the quad-core option kept me at 15. Id love to get a 13 quad-core with retina display and 256GB SSD. Ill order it with the lowest amount of ram possible and then upgrade to 16GB from NewEgg. I hope Apple doesnt make the new line super-thin and then kill the speed. Most pros want speed over a little more portability. If anything, remove the SuperDrive and Ethernet ports. Maybe even the SD card reader. Most pros would be using CF cards anyway. I know I do, and my USB adapter cost about $10. Or they could go USB 3.0 and nix FW800. But that would be a last resort. Then release a Thunderbolt to FW adapter for those who still need it. Shave those off before speed! But don't forget adapters for legacy users.
__________________
MacBook Pro R-Type / Quad 2.6GHz Core i7 / 28801800 / 16GB / 512GB SSD
Canon 7D w/grip / 24-105L / 100-400L / Sony RX100
64GB iPad Mini Retina LTE / 64GB iPhone 5 / 8GB Original iPhone / Xbox One
macduke is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:15 AM   #13
abhimat.gautam
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Berkeley, CA
Send a message via AIM to abhimat.gautam Send a message via Yahoo to abhimat.gautam
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
As it turns out, we previously reported that Intel's new Quad-Core Ivy Bridge processor will be heat efficient enough to fit in Apple's 13" MacBook chassis for the first time. The limiting factor for a Quad-Core 13" MacBook Pro had previously been the heat output of the processor. If Apple chooses to go this route, they could eliminate Dual-Core processors entirely from their MacBook Pro line, side stepping any delays.
Id guess that 13" MacBook Pro might itself be eliminated. With the new 13" Air, the presence of a 13" MacBook Pro seems kind of odd.
__________________
Abhimat Gautam
abhimat.gautam is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:24 AM   #14
Icaras
macrumors 601
 
Icaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California, United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by abhimat.gautam View Post
I’d guess that 13" MacBook Pro might itself be eliminated. With the new 13" Air, the presence of a 13" MacBook Pro seems kind of odd.
I agree. I think the 13" MBP is out, just like the white Macbook. The new Pro line will consist only of the 15" and 17" models and hopefully in their new MBA-like designs, they will still have large enough of a chassis to house quad core Ivy Bridge chips to meet schedule.

Also, if this is the case, having dual cores only on the Air models (11" and 13"), and Quad cores only on the Macbook Pros (15" and 17"), this should make for a nice and noticeable class distinction between the two product lines without any power overlap.
__________________
iMac (27-inch, Late 2012) iPad Air iPhone 5 Apple TV (3rd Generation) Airport Time Capsule OS X Yosemite iOS 7 Logic Pro X
Icaras is offline   -2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:25 AM   #15
Jobsian
macrumors 6502a
 
Jobsian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
This is fantastic news. Despite non-inclusion of "mobile" CPUs, I hope the non-delayed CPUs include the 2 potentials for any updated MacBook Air, namely:

1) Core i5 3427U - 1.8GHz, turbo to 2.6GHz - 2.8GHz at 17W TDP
2) Core i7 3667U - 2.0GHz, turbo to 3.0GHZ - 3.2GHz at 17W TDP


...or that Apple have first bite at them a la the 1st Gen MacBook Air, fingers crossed!
Jobsian is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:29 AM   #16
illian
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Porsche-City, Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by macduke View Post
Wanted to go 13 last time around, but the quad-core option kept me at 15. Id love to get a 13 quad-core with retina display and 256GB SSD. Ill order it with the lowest amount of ram possible and then upgrade to 16GB from NewEgg. I hope Apple doesnt make the new line super-thin and then kill the speed. Most pros want speed over a little more portability. If anything, remove the SuperDrive and Ethernet ports. Maybe even the SD card reader. Most pros would be using CF cards anyway. I know I do, and my USB adapter cost about $10. Or they could go USB 3.0 and nix FW800. But that would be a last resort. Then release a Thunderbolt to FW adapter for those who still need it. Shave those off before speed! But don't forget adapters for legacy users.
quad-core in a mba 13"?
please not yet another adapter to buy and carry around...

i think retina will be first introduced in the new mba 15", less power no external gpu but retina, ssd and a higher price as the macbook 15 pro.
apple is getting 100 extra for the "high res" display in the mbp 15...they will lose that money, when they keep the price of the mbps (with retina display being the only option).
illian is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:31 AM   #17
David G.
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Spokane, WA
Digitimes was, is, and will continue to be a farce.
David G. is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:43 AM   #18
Supa_Fly
macrumors 68030
 
Supa_Fly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Send a message via MSN to Supa_Fly
Quote:
Originally Posted by abhimat.gautam View Post
Id guess that 13" MacBook Pro might itself be eliminated. With the new 13" Air, the presence of a 13" MacBook Pro seems kind of odd.
Indeed. I really think the 13" MBP has almost outlived its purpose:
same USB ports, same thunderbolt (with ability to use 1 more external screen than the MBA), a SuperDrive ... and more heat than the MBA Ultimate.
Farewell - I may just end up getting one just for the more powerful Core i7!!

15" MBA:
$2100 starting up to $2600 for the BTO version
256GB SSD to 480GB SSD Blade
4-8MB L3 Cache
Intel HD 4000 (OpenCL support finally) & NVidia/ATi hybrid graphics when needed.
2x 3.0 USB ports
Thunderbolt
10-14hr Battery life ... I think this overall would be useful to EVERY pro user!
XC SD Card slot but I'm hoping that ExpressCard slot makes a comeback: CompactFlash, external video card, and FW800 all is easy via a VERY light & small expansion card that fits in your back pocket - very negligible vs that heavy sizeable miniature SSD Thunderbolt portable drive.
Combo Optical/non-optical Sound In/Out port (like MBA & 13" MBP)
Kensington LOCK hole.
1680x1200 Hi-Res matte display across the 15" board.

the 17" will remain untouched or a specific slim build that will still enjoy the SuperDrive, for those that just need that iMac like power, no desk in their crawlspace and still have power on the go.
__________________
2008 Al_MB 2.4Ghz C2D 4GB/256GB HDD/256MB Nvidia 9400M| Panther Dog Tags | Z10 | 2010 Mac Switcher
Supa_Fly is offline   -2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:45 AM   #19
314631
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: iDeaded myself
I'm looking forward to this product refresh. I really hope we get an ultra-high-resolution display in the laptops this time.
314631 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:48 AM   #20
Stridder44
macrumors 68040
 
Stridder44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Wait a minute, would this mean that digitimes, a notoriously inaccurate news source, was wrong?
__________________
iPhone 5
MacBook Pro 2.53GHz/320GB HDD/4GB RAM
iMac G4 800MHz/80GB HDD/512MB RAM
Stridder44 is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:57 AM   #21
Supa_Fly
macrumors 68030
 
Supa_Fly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Send a message via MSN to Supa_Fly
Quote:
Originally Posted by macduke View Post
Wanted to go 13 last time around, but the quad-core option kept me at 15. Id love to get a 13 quad-core with retina display and 256GB SSD. Ill order it with the lowest amount of ram possible and then upgrade to 16GB from NewEgg. I hope Apple doesnt make the new line super-thin and then kill the speed. Most pros want speed over a little more portability. If anything, remove the SuperDrive and Ethernet ports. Maybe even the SD card reader. Most pros would be using CF cards anyway. I know I do, and my USB adapter cost about $10. Or they could go USB 3.0 and nix FW800. But that would be a last resort. Then release a Thunderbolt to FW adapter for those who still need it. Shave those off before speed! But don't forget adapters for legacy users.
Which is faster for data transfer In/Out (both) of a hi-end digital camera vs Laptop: Compact Flash or SecureDigital Card?

Although we could use the data in this link as a guide (below), note that its based on an SDXC interface running on a USB 2.0 bus that does not support the bandwidth of newer SDXC cards that are much more than capable in size (by Pretec) or in speeds.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=36290256

I'm still very curious though.
__________________
2008 Al_MB 2.4Ghz C2D 4GB/256GB HDD/256MB Nvidia 9400M| Panther Dog Tags | Z10 | 2010 Mac Switcher
Supa_Fly is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 02:58 AM   #22
StuLax18
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Huge sigh of relief here!
__________________
rMBP 2.3/16/256
MacBook 2.2 C2D/4GB/320GB
iPhone 5 32GB black, iPhone 4 16GB
StuLax18 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 03:02 AM   #23
Dreamer2go
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
I'm hoping that there is no merger of MBA and MBP, for the sake of the name.... since "Pro" probably attracts "Pro" consumers such as: video editor/photo editor, while the Air is more consumer friendly....... (think the hardware inside between those two)

That said, if it does merge, I will still buy it haha!

None the less, I am waiting for the new upgrade........ my MBP Santa Rosa 2007 is dying......
It can't even use the full features of Lion/Mountain Lion...

This upgrade seems very interesting and tempting.......
__________________
2012 Retina Macbook Pro: Intel Corei7 2.6Ghz | 16GB RAM | 512GB HD | 1GB Nvidia 650M |
iPhone 5s, iPad Air, Google Nexus 5
Dreamer2go is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 03:07 AM   #24
kiantech
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamer2go View Post
I'm hoping that there is no merger of MBA and MBP, for the sake of the name.... since "Pro" probably attracts "Pro" consumers such as: video editor/photo editor, while the Air is more consumer friendly....... (think the hardware inside between those two)

That said, if it does merge, I will still buy it haha!

None the less, I am waiting for the new upgrade........ my MBP Santa Rosa 2007 is dying......
It can't even use the full features of Lion/Mountain Lion...

This upgrade seems very interesting and tempting.......
We are running the same 2007 MBP, same specs too. I'm waiting to throw done once these babies get updated.
kiantech is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2012, 03:09 AM   #25
mrxak
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Drifting through space in a broken escape pod
Digitimes wrong? Perish the thought! Glad to such rumors refuted swiftly.
__________________
Phones Will Kill You
mrxak is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will Macs with Haswell CPUs get cut off later than those with Ivy Bridge CPUs? maclunian OS X 0 Apr 24, 2014 06:48 PM
Intel caught using cheap thermal paste in Ivy Bridge? srkmish Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 1 Aug 20, 2013 01:11 PM
Intel Looking to Cut Power Consumption on Future Ivy Bridge Chips MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 125 Dec 18, 2012 10:18 PM
Ivy Bridge v/s Sandy Bridge & why Apple might skip Ivy for iMac ? mjoshi123 iMac 6 Sep 15, 2012 11:27 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC