In general, SGSIII came up to be what most people expected but there is one surprise that no one predicted. SGSIII managed to outperform iPhone 4S in graphic benchmarks. Until now iPhone's GPU had a big advantage compared to all other phones. Here are the charts from
anantech.com:
And for those who say that "benchmarks do not matter" and "iPhone UI is very smooth" here is a quote from anandtech: "As Brian put it when he first got time with the device:
it's butter."
And with 4 A9 cores running at 1.4GHz vs the iPhone 4's 1 A8 core running at 800MHz and with no out-of-order execution, it only took Samsung & Google 8x the CPU cycles to do with Android what Apple has been doing for years with iOS!
My Galaxy Nexus was constantly overheating and rebooting. I'd pull it out of my pocket and that ugly ICS start-up screen (the one with those twisty things) would be on the screen and the spot on the case where the SOC was would be burning hot. No thanks.
Everyone knows that eventually someone is going to jam a big enough, hot enough, battery-hungry-enough CPU in an Android phone to match the smooth UI of iOS devices of 2 years ago. Maybe this is it. Even my GNex, which was very good, still wasn't nearly as smooth or as apparently fast my 4S is.
That's part of the reason I chuckle when I read these benchmarks. Every one of these android phones feels so noticeably slower than any iPhone I've ever used, and I still haven't owned a smartphone that had anywhere near the battery life that my iPhone 4 had (not even my 4S, unfortunately). My GNex was terrible for battery life, and I had to order away to Korea for an extended life battery to make it halfway acceptable. And 'buttery smooth'? Exactly what they said about the GNex. "So does it still have the touch-screen slop that Android is known for?" Yes, it did. "Does it still halt and shudder when following intents to a new application?" Yes, it does.
Maybe with 8x the CPU cycles to work with, Samsung will finally get it right.