Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

NMF

macrumors 6502a
Oct 27, 2011
885
21
I'm impressed at how smoothly CS:GO runs in OSX. Compared to TF2 it's pretty incredible.
 

Beezzy

macrumors 6502
Apr 23, 2011
268
11
Why this is homepage material?

The mind boggles.

Why is it that big of a deal? Just because it isn't your idea of front page doesn't mean it isn't important to others. I wouldn't have known it was on Mac if it wasn't for this post since I dont have a steam account.
 

Revelation78

macrumors 68000
Dec 18, 2008
1,508
11
North Carolina
Does Counter-Strike: Source not count? Because I'm pretty sure that has been out for the Mac for a while now.

If you read the title you will see that they mentioned a simultaneous release, meaning on launch day. CS:Source was released on the PC long before Steam came to the Mac platform, thus CS:Source does not count in this instance.
 

Kiwidaniel

macrumors member
Sep 3, 2010
39
5
New York City
For those wondering about running the game on a Macbook air. I have the summer 2012 model of the macbook air.


Specs are in my sig, it runs perfectly. ;)
 

Treq

macrumors 6502a
Apr 23, 2009
963
1,496
Santa Monica, CA
Dude, for some people, Counter Strike defines the internet: that's how big this game is.

No, porn defines the Internet. Quote from Scrubs: "if they took all the porn off the Internet, there would be only one web site left, and it would be; bringbacktheporn.com...". :p
 

damir00

macrumors 6502a
Oct 30, 2011
744
7
Look, I'm just saying dropping $2000 on a facebook machine to play CS when you can get a better-looking PC at 10x the performance at $1000 is a gigantic waste of time and money.

Most things people do are a gigantic waste of time and money.

Including posting on MR.

And especially including playing Battlefield. ;)
 

Yebubbleman

macrumors 603
May 20, 2010
5,785
2,377
Los Angeles, CA
If you read the title you will see that they mentioned a simultaneous release, meaning on launch day. CS:Source was released on the PC long before Steam came to the Mac platform, thus CS:Source does not count in this instance.

I wasn't quoting the title, I was quoting the sentence, which was incorrect.
 

battlefieldfan1

macrumors member
Aug 16, 2012
37
0
Most things people do are a gigantic waste of time and money.

Including posting on MR.

And especially including playing Battlefield. ;)

Does posting on this site require you to fork over $2000?
Apple products are cheaply made and easily breakable. Most of the money to shell over to Apple is for the brand; it's not for the (Lack of) quality.

Who on earth would buy a mac just to play CS? I don't think anyone here would. It's great we can play it with everyone else though ;)

Oh, I dunno... Macs are overpriced and weak, like all other Apple products. I don't think you can play any other good game that's been released recently. And no, Runescape isn't awesome, so don't even try to pull that one on me.
 

Treq

macrumors 6502a
Apr 23, 2009
963
1,496
Santa Monica, CA
Does posting on this site require you to fork over $2000?
Apple products are cheaply made and easily breakable. Most of the money to shell over to Apple is for the brand; it's not for the (Lack of) quality.



Oh, I dunno... Macs are overpriced and weak, like all other Apple products. I don't think you can play any other good game that's been released recently. And no, Runescape isn't awesome, so don't even try to pull that one on me.

Umm... Toll...
 

JordanNZ

macrumors 6502a
Apr 29, 2004
768
270
Auckland, New Zealand
Does posting on this site require you to fork over $2000?
Apple products are cheaply made and easily breakable. Most of the money to shell over to Apple is for the brand; it's not for the (Lack of) quality.



Oh, I dunno... Macs are overpriced and weak, like all other Apple products. I don't think you can play any other good game that's been released recently. And no, Runescape isn't awesome, so don't even try to pull that one on me.

I personally don't agree with the first part of your post.

But the second part. I have no idea? Define a 'good recent game'? I'm not much of a gamer. Completely casual.
 

luqtotheman

macrumors regular
Jun 14, 2012
198
3
It will run with gusto. The Intel graphics are over 2-3x as fast as the system requirements mentioned in the article. Additionally, since Source performance is mostly dependent on CPU over GPU, the i7 will absolutely shred this game.

thanks bro!!!!

I think I'll pick it up!
 

munkery

macrumors 68020
Dec 18, 2006
2,217
1
Just a guess, but maybe because the specs on Apples (particularly the graphics) are way below the other x64 systems one can buy.

Seems strange that PCs of equal spec to those lower spec Macs are excluded.

Arbitrarily forcing users of older Windows PC hardware still capable of running the software to upgrade despite still being capable of running the software.

That seems like something only Apple would be accused of doing.
 

Treq

macrumors 6502a
Apr 23, 2009
963
1,496
Santa Monica, CA
Not a troll. My 2011 17-inch macbook pro can barely run lowest settings TF2, a game which was released 5-years-ago.

That's wierd... I just ran it on my 2009 Mac mini last weekend. And on my 2011 15in mbp as well. Ran smooth as silk on the MBP... Though I think mountain lion has improved on the video drivers, as on lion and snow leopard games weren't as smooth.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.