Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:44 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Jury Finds Largely in Favor of Apple in Apple vs. Samsung Trial, Awards More than $1 Billion in Damages




After three days of deliberations, the jury reached a unanimous verdict in the Apple vs. Samsung trial. The jury found largely for Apple, ruling that Samsung had willfully infringed on both Apple patents and trade dress for the iPhone -- though notably the jury found in favor of Samsung on questions regarding its tablets. The jury found that Samsung owes Apple $1.05 billion in damages for willfully infringing on Apple's intellectual property.

Apple's stock price rose to an all-time high, more than $675 per share, in after-hours trading following the verdict.

The three-week trial has resulted in interesting testimony and evidence from both sides, including looks at early iPhone and iPad prototypes, Apple and Samsung mobile device sales numbers in the U.S., and an internal Samsung memo that examined what the company needed to change in its Galaxy line of smartphones to compete with the iPhone.

The 9-person jury was asked to fill out a 20-page jury form with more than 700 questions across 33 groups. They were required to come to a unanimous decision on each question and court-watchers didn't expect a verdict until at least next week.




The following is our liveblog as the verdict was written:

The jury was asked to fill out a form covering 33 separate questions regarding patents, trade dress, and antitrust.

On the first claim, regarding the '381 "bounce back" patent, the jury finds Samsung guilty on all counts. Samsung infringed on Apple's patent on a wide variety of products.

On Apple's "pinch and zoom" '915 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on all but three products.

For the "double-tap to zoom" '163 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on a wide number of products, but not all.

The jury found that Samsung took actions that it knew or should have known were infringing across the '381, '915, and '163 patents on most, though not on all, counts.

For the '677 patent, covering Apple's trade dress registration of the look of the front of the iPhone, the jury found that Samsung did infringe on most devices, but again, not all.

For the D'087 patent, covering Apple's trade dress registration of the look of the back of the iPhone, the jury found that Samsung did infringe on some devices, but not all.

For the '305 patent, covering the trade dress registration of the iPhone's home screen, the jury found that Samsung infringed across most devices.

For the D'889 patent, covering the trade dress registration of the iPad's appearance, the jury found that Samsung's tablets do not infringe -- one of the first victories for Samsung.

On the question of whether Samsung Korea knew or should have known it was inducing US subsidiaries to infringe on the D'677, D'087, D'305 and/or D'889 patents, the jury found in favor of Apple across a wide number of phones and patents, though not on the '889 patent regarding the iPad. These two questions are significant for Apple to receive damages.

On the question of whether Samsung's infringement was willful, the jury again found for Apple on a number of patents and devices.

Finally, the jury ruled that all of Apple's patents are valid.

Regarding trade dress, Apple has proven that its unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress was protectable, and the jury found that a number of Samsung phone models violated Apple's trade dress, though not all of them.

Overall, the jury is finding for Apple on most counts.

Regarding damages, the jury finds that Apple should be awarded $1,051,855,000 in damages for willfully violating Apple's patents and trade dress.

Next up are Samsung's claims against Apple.

The jury has found for Apple regarding its alleged infringement of Samsung's utility patents on every claim, however Apple did not prove they were invalid. The jury did not award Samsung any damages.

Finally, Apple did not prove that Samsung violated antitrust obligations regarding its FRAND patents.

Apple did prove that Samsung is barred from enforcing its '516 and '941 patents.

Update: CNet provides a nice breakdown of patents and the devices found to infringe.

Article Link: Jury Finds Largely in Favor of Apple in Apple vs. Samsung Trial, Awards More than $1 Billion in Damages
MacRumors is offline   17 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:44 PM   #2
Hildron101010
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
 
Suspense

The suspense is killing me!
Hildron101010 is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:45 PM   #3
pk7
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Colorado
Come on Apple!
__________________
With regards from pk7
Early 2011 MacBook Pro 15" 2.0 GHz, 16 GB RAM | Space Grey AT&T iPhone 5s 32 GB | White Verizon iPad (4th generation) 32 GB
Old: iPhone 4S, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 3G, iPod nano 3

Last edited by pk7; Aug 24, 2012 at 06:45 PM.
pk7 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:45 PM   #4
applefanDrew
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Guilty!
applefanDrew is offline   28 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:45 PM   #5
MrMorden
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Guatemala
I'm curious...

We will know soon, I guess.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro, 2.2 GHz intel Core i7, 8 GB RAM, 750 GB HD
iPad 3 Wi-Fi + 4G 64 GB
iPhone 5S 32 GB
MrMorden is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:46 PM   #6
mozmac
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Utah
Verdict: iOS is better than Android.
__________________
I own lots of Apple stuff.
mozmac is offline   60 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:46 PM   #7
ViPhone
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
WSJ is still waiting for an update too.
__________________
iPhone 4, Apple TV2, iPad 1, Macbook Pro 15", Macbook 13"
Let's go HEAT'.
ViPhone is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:47 PM   #8
nick_elt
macrumors 68000
 
nick_elt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Breaking News! The USADA have found both Samsung and Apple guilty! They have also found HP, Microsoft and RIM guilty aswell despite no evidence or charges laid against them.
nick_elt is offline   39 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:48 PM   #9
troop231
macrumors 601
 
troop231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Steve would've allowed this.


/depending on the outcome
troop231 is offline   17 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:48 PM   #10
Steve J0bs
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Sunshine State
Here we go
Steve J0bs is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:48 PM   #11
Reach9
macrumors 68020
 
Reach9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In America
I knew Apple would win all along

Here is a thought... couldn't Apple patent these features and then give it's competitors such as Samsung and Google rights to use it as long as Apple got a royalty of each device sold? Wouldn't that make Apple even more profitable and still "the innovator for the whole industry"?

Last edited by Reach9; Aug 24, 2012 at 06:03 PM. Reason: update from The Verge's live stream-nvm made a new post
Reach9 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:48 PM   #12
ImperialForces
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sure! Do you have a pen and paper? I'm in your moms house. I'll be waiting.
Excellent. The fact that the jury reached a verdict this quickly means that the decision was quite obvious. - hopefully.
__________________
Embrace the power of the dark side...
ImperialForces is offline   18 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:48 PM   #13
chrmjenkins
macrumors 603
 
chrmjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA
This seems quick. I bet it's a hung jury. Doesn't mesh with announcement of verdict. Probably a lot of non-infringement decisions on most of the counts.

Last edited by chrmjenkins; Aug 24, 2012 at 05:29 PM.
chrmjenkins is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:48 PM   #14
falcora
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Samsung is ordered to accept a buyout by Apple to the tune of 10 billion dollars. Now Apple can further develop the retina display and launch its line of Apple TV panels.
__________________
Retina MacBook Pro 2.3 Ghz Haswell 512 SSD, 64 GB iPad Air WiFi+Cellular, 64 GB iPhone 5s
falcora is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:48 PM   #15
ViPhone
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick_elt View Post
Breaking News! The USADA have found both Samsung and Apple guilty! They have also found HP, Microsoft and RIM guilty aswell despite no evidence or charges laid against them.
Been waiting to use that one all day?
__________________
iPhone 4, Apple TV2, iPad 1, Macbook Pro 15", Macbook 13"
Let's go HEAT'.
ViPhone is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:49 PM   #16
mklaman
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
the verdict will be read simultaneously on both apple and samsung mobile devices.
mklaman is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:49 PM   #17
jav6454
macrumors G5
 
jav6454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
One thing must be said

__________________
Al MacBook 2.4GHz Late '08 | 5 S⃣ | Macross Click Me

Last edited by jav6454; Aug 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM.
jav6454 is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:51 PM   #18
jon9091
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
I bet they went to the side of Samsung because they couldn't wade through the BS verdict form.
jon9091 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:53 PM   #19
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hobe Sound, FL (20 miles north of Palm Beach)
Prepare yourselves

We're about to get 500+ posts raving about the wonderful patent system we have, "serves Samsung right," "now sue the rest of them Apple", "did Google die", etc.

Or, we're about to get 500+ posts finding huge fault with the "outdated, antiquated" patent system we have, "Apple should appeal," "Apple should immediately cut all business relations with all Samsung units," etc.
HobeSoundDarryl is offline   45 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:54 PM   #20
mbh
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImperialForces View Post
Excellent. The fact that the jury reached a verdict this quickly means that the decision was quite obvious. - hopefully.
Or it means they just didn't want to have to come back next week and deal with this stuff again.
mbh is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:55 PM   #21
Cougarcat
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbh View Post
Or it means they just didn't want to have to come back next week and deal with this stuff again.
Yep, can't mess with labor day vacation plans.
Cougarcat is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:56 PM   #22
Flying Dutchmen
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
This is more exciting than the up&coming iPhone Event
__________________
|| MBA 13" 2012 Model 128GB+8GB || iPhone 5 || iPad 3 64GB LTE || iPod Nano + LunaTik, iPod Shuffle, iPod Touch || Airport Express & AppleTV||
Flying Dutchmen is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:56 PM   #23
iAppl3Fan
macrumors 6502a
 
iAppl3Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Come on !
__________________
 13" MacBook Air (Mid 2013) + Dual 27" Thunderbolt Display
 15" MacBook Pro with Retina Display (Mid 2012) + 24" LED Cinema Display
 TV |  Time Capsule |  iPod |  iPhone |  iPad Air/mini
iAppl3Fan is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:57 PM   #24
nick_elt
macrumors 68000
 
nick_elt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Dutchmen View Post
This is more exciting than the up&coming iPhone Event
Yeh cos we know that outcome
nick_elt is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2012, 04:57 PM   #25
daneoni
macrumors G4
 
daneoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Ha ha. This is gonna be good.

__________________
15" rMBP Core i7 | 27" ACD | AEBS | 5G iPod | iPhone 5S | 3G Apple TV | rMini
daneoni is offline   24 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jury Finds Both Apple and Samsung Guilty of Patent Infringement, Samsung to Pay $119.6 Million, Apple to Pay $158,400 MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 609 May 23, 2014 05:53 PM
Jury Rules Samsung Must Pay Apple $290 Million in Damages Retrial MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 166 Nov 25, 2013 12:52 PM
Apple Marketing Chief Phil Schiller Appears On the Witness Stand in Apple/Samsung Damages Trial MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 129 Nov 21, 2013 09:12 AM
Judge Voids Nearly Half of Apple's $1 Billion Judgment Against Samsung, Calls for New Trial to Settle Revised Damages MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 214 Mar 8, 2013 11:36 AM
Proposed Jury Form for Apple v Samsung Trial kdarling Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 4 Aug 15, 2012 12:49 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC