Your point being?
Every single phone manufacturer does this.
''a lighted USB-to-Lightning cable''??
Forgive this but is that a word? 'lighted'? Is it a term in Apple speak?
Wow. Look at the size of that USB connector.
That's because of the lighting in the cable. I a 30 pin version from my iPhone 4 and it's the same. When you open that up, the controller for the cable lighting is underneath.
I hope everyone realizes that using unauthorized accessories voids AppleCare. Use at your own risk.
Official **** will come out soon enough.
Apple's lightning cable is very small and contains the same electronics. No, the size of the cable is due to the blue lighting.
Lighted is a commonly used adjective in American English.
Ah, condescendance. People are happy that options are popping up. As it was, Apple failed to launch cables/adapters on day 1 for buyers of the iPhone 5, leaving us stranded with 1 cable. If something happened, no more phone charging...
And what is laughable about the picture ? Sure light-up cables are goofy and I wouldn't use it, but the real news here is that 3rd parties are managing to get their hands on the chips and cracked chips are coming which should create volume and start the race to the bottom. We might be able to have variable length cables now on the cheap from Monoprice, in more than just 1 color (which happens to be white).
Man **** apple! Charging me 37$ for a lightning adapter. Seriously. I mean seriously. An expected 100$m to be made from just a ****ing adapter? Just wow apple. Just wow. How about spending more on r&d instead of patents. Just makes me sick. This coming from a company that prides itself in innovation. Yeah right. Not for long.
While there might be other ways to figure out required pin configuration what you said makes sense. If that is correct though the authentication chip should only be required for connecting to legacy hardware (charge only or USB). All new hardware developed specifically for Lightning should have this feature in the device itself rather than in the cable.
Peter Bradstock, who started all those rumors about the "authentication" chip and then "dynamic pin assignment", which have since made it all the way around the interwebs and even CNN has "reported" on, also sells custom headphone cable kits for $17,000.00. I'm not sure I would trust any of what he has to say about the engineering behind Apple's Lightning interface.
I kind of agree with you that this chip being for pin reassignment doesn't add up. First of all, from just looking at the ribbon cables in the iFixit teardown, you can see that there are two sets of traces going to the female Lightning connector in the iPhone 5 that look like differential signaling pairs. I just double checked my Lightning cable against Mr. Bradstock's pinout, and came up with similar results to his, although his pin numbering seems a bit wonky. If we number the pins on the female jack from left to right, like this:
Shield 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Shield
And call "top" side of the male Lightning connector "Side A" (the one I believe the chips to be on, although I didn't actually cut mine open to find out.) Then we arrive at a pinout that looks like this:
Code:Lightning Lightning Plug Side A Plug Side B USB Type A Shield --------- Shield ---- Shield (tied to GND) 1 ------------- 1 ------------ 4 GND 2 ------------- 7 ------------ 3 D+ 3 ------------- 6 ------------ 2 D- 4 ------------- 8 5 ------------- 5 (1 VBUS)? 6 ------------- 3 7 ------------- 2 8 ------------- 4
As you can see, there is no direct path for the USB VBUS, but there sure is for D+, D- and GND, so the cable does not reassign its own pins. The SoC in the iPhone 5 would appear to switch the signaling pair being used depending on the cable orientation. It would also appear to be outputting a completely normal USB 2.0 signal; no muxing/demuxing appears to be done by the chips in the cable.
I would therefore presume that the chips have more to do with voltage regulation and/or digital negotiation of bus power. I suppose it is possible that the larger chip also communicates with the SoC via an AUX channel or C-wire to request a USB 2.0 signal rather than a video signal, or acts as a sort of trusted platform module to lock out unauthorized aftermarket accessories, but I have trouble believing that the latter is the primary purpose.
Apple's lightning cable is very small and contains the same electronics. No, the size of the cable is due to the blue lighting.
I think he means as opposed to the more common "lit" instead of lighted.
This nation needs a monument to the victims of Apple Rip Off.
I don't think anyone has ever claimed that the *cable* (male connector) end of things is where the dynamic pin assignment was happening.
Guess I could, ye! But the dock would still be white, wouldn't it? 😉You can just use your own cable
"Make the impossible possible" - Steve Jobs 😉If is not just a connector. the converter chip lives in there too. So why not say "Wow what a small converter box"
"Make the impossible possible" - Steve Jobs 😉
Man **** apple! Charging me 37$ for a lightning adapter. Seriously. I mean seriously. An expected 100$m to be made from just a ****ing adapter? Just wow apple. Just wow. How about spending more on r&d instead of patents. Just makes me sick. This coming from a company that prides itself in innovation. Yeah right. Not for long.
No.
What you say is correct. But what I mean is something like this:
Image
There should be a standard. But there is not. Loose your cable and you have to buy a 3rd party knock off or pay top dollar from the original supplier for a replacement.