Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:14 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple's New A6X iPad Chip Adopts PowerVR SGX 554MP4 Graphics




AnandTech reports on an examination of the A6X chip found in the fourth-generation iPad. The work, performed by Kishonti Informatics, reveals that Apple has adopted Imagination Technologies' quad-core PowerVR SGX 554MP4 graphics in the new chip.
Quote:
The A6X retains the 128-bit wide memory interface of the A5X (and it keeps the memory controller interface adjacent to the GPU cores and not the CPU cores as is the case in the A5/A6). It also integrates two of Apple's new Swift cores running at up to 1.4GHz (a slight increase from the 1.3GHz cores in the iPhone 5's A6). The big news today is what happens on the GPU side. A quick look at the GLBenchmark results for the new iPad 4 tells us all we need to know. The A6X moves to a newer GPU core: the PowerVR SGX 554.
Unsurprisingly, the SGX 554MP4 represents a significant improvement over the quad-core SGX 543MP4 used in the A5X chip of the third-generation iPad and the triple-core SGX 543MP3 used in the A6 chip of the iPhone 5.

A full suite of graphics benchmarks reveals improvements of 15-100% compared to the third-generation iPad, with frame rates in the Egypt HD benchmark jumping from 25 frames per second (fps) on the third-generation iPad to nearly 52 fps on the fourth-generation iPad.
Quote:
Ultimately it looks like the A6X is the SoC that the iPad needed to really deliver good gaming performance at its native resolution. I would not be surprised to see more game developers default to 2048 x 1536 on the new iPad rather than picking a lower resolution and enabling anti-aliasing. The bar has been set for this generation and we've seen what ARM's latest GPU can do, now the question is whether or not NVIDIA will finally be able to challenge Imagination Technologies when it releases Wayne/Tegra 4 next year.
The A6X is one of several enhancements to the fourth-generation iPad, including a new FaceTime HD camera and Apple's new Lightning connector, although the device appears nearly identical to its predecessor from the outside.

Article Link: Apple's New A6X iPad Chip Adopts PowerVR SGX 554MP4 Graphics
MacRumors is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:15 PM   #2
Aluminum213
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
iPad 3 owners tears coming in 3...2...
Aluminum213 is offline   29 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:18 PM   #3
iThinkIt
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Florida, USA
1..
iThinkIt is offline   20 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:21 PM   #4
jav6454
macrumors G5
 
jav6454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
I wonder what the constraints are concerning power. Also, if, having 2x 543 cores gives 19.2 GFLOPS of compute GPU power, why didn't Apple opted for a single core 554 that has the same specs as two 543s in their A6 chip? There are no differences in core count, bandwidth, compute, or anything else. Eliminate a core, deliver greater performance no?
__________________
Al MacBook 2.4GHz Late '08 | 5 S⃣ | Macross Click Me
jav6454 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:24 PM   #5
NutsNGum
macrumors 68030
 
NutsNGum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Wow, Angry Birds is going to be blinding on this model!
NutsNGum is offline   21 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:25 PM   #6
shoes222
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Considering this is one of the fastest Apple products to be discontinued...they should offer a $100 trade-in upgrade program for the 4th gen iPad or SOMETHING. It would create goodwill among the hardcore base, and then they could take customers' iPad 3's which are in perfectly good condition and slap them on the refurb store. It would such easy money lining Apple's pockets, I don't know why they don't do this.
shoes222 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:25 PM   #7
silverf1re
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Hope games like Infinity Blade Dungeons got pushed back because they recognize the graphics potential of the ipad 4 (What ever you call it)
silverf1re is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:25 PM   #8
KylePowers
macrumors 68000
 
KylePowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Hopefully we'll see a similar performance upgrade in the 5th generation
KylePowers is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:26 PM   #9
profets
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aluminum213 View Post
iPad 3 owners tears coming in 3...2...
I've owned an iPad 3rd gen since launch and think this is awesome news.

I like what they've done to update the iPad, and it doesn't mean mine will suddenly stop working.
profets is offline   39 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:26 PM   #10
whooleytoo
macrumors 603
 
whooleytoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cork, Ireland.
Send a message via AIM to whooleytoo
Incredible improvements in performance... From a gaming perspective, it'll be interesting to see how these compare with current-gen consoles, considering they're on ~10 year upgrade cycles and the iPad's last iteration lasted about 6 months.
__________________
Mac <- Macintosh <- McIntosh apples <- John McIntosh <- McIntosh surname <- "Mac an toshach" <- "Son of the Chief"
whooleytoo is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:26 PM   #11
gnasher729
macrumors G5
 
gnasher729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
And someone posted here that he bought an iPad 3, because of the rumour that the iPad 4 graphics would be slower...
gnasher729 is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:30 PM   #12
chrmjenkins
macrumors 603
 
chrmjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by KylePowers View Post
Hopefully we'll see a similar performance upgrade in the 5th generation
Could be greater. Rogue will be ready this time next year. 4 core variants hit ps3 and Xbox 360 numbers.
chrmjenkins is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:36 PM   #13
Aluminum213
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
And someone posted here that he bought an iPad 3, because of the rumour that the iPad 4 graphics would be slower...
I remember that exactly, they said the iPad 4 would be slower because the A6 chip would only have a triple GPU
Aluminum213 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:36 PM   #14
commander.data
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by jav6454 View Post
I wonder what the constraints are concerning power. Also, if, having 2x 543 cores gives 19.2 GFLOPS of compute GPU power, why didn't Apple opted for a single core 554 that has the same specs as two 543s in their A6 chip? There are no differences in core count, bandwidth, compute, or anything else. Eliminate a core, deliver greater performance no?
Anand's chart is kind of misleading because he is focusing on ALU performance which incidentally is the main thing that changes between the SGX554MP and SGX543MP. When you go from a SGX543MP2 to a SGX543MP4 everything doubles including the ALU, TMU and ROP count. Going from the SGX543MP to SGX554MP only the ALU count doubles. As such, the 2x performance increase from A5X to A6X is very nuanced. Due to doubled ALU count and a small clock speed increase, the theoretical ALU increase for shaders is actually greater than 2x. However, the ROP count has not increased and so fill rate has only increased modestly due to clock speed only, which means that on a raw pixel pushing measure, the iPad 4 still hasn't fully accounted for the 4x increase in pixel count over the iPad 2. And so compared to the iPad 3, developers can't just double everything but will have to be more selective over how and what graphical effects they increase.

For the iPhone 5, since the resolution didn't increase significantly over the previous iPhones, Apple probably could have used a SGX554MP2 to double ALU performance over the iPhone 4S and use a small clock speed bump for a modest increase in fill rate to account for the increased resolution. However, risk may have been an issue. The iPhone 5 had to ship this fall and with an already new CPU architecture, going with a tried and true SGX543MP design was the safer option. The iPad 4 was already a bit of a surprise and didn't necessarily have to ship this year since there several iDevices that continue to use the 30-pin connector anyways, so Apple had some flexibility to take additional risk with the SGX554MP in the A6X.
commander.data is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:41 PM   #15
jack92029
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exynos 5250

It would be very interesting to see a side by side comparison of how the A6X compares to the new Samsung Exynos 5250
__________________
Late 2012 Mac Mini 2.3 Ghz i7, 1 TB, 8 Gb Ram Geek Benchmark 10955
jack92029 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:44 PM   #16
jimN
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Send a message via MSN to jimN
More to the point, look where the Nexus 10 sits on all these charts. I appreciate that it's pushing a lot of pixels but the experience it delivers is consistently worse than the new iPad, the iPhone and, more often than not, the 3rd gen iPad too. Plus its battery was woeful on the Engadget review.

People might be knocking Apple but their products are still at the bleeding edge performance wise.
jimN is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:53 PM   #17
wackymacky
macrumors 65816
 
wackymacky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: sent to 17.019528,-25.06721 for the next 6 weeks for my sins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aluminum213 View Post
iPad 3 owners tears coming in 3...2...
What about iPhone 5 owners?

I might hold on to my 4s a little longer.
wackymacky is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:53 PM   #18
Eduardo1971
macrumors 65816
 
Eduardo1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lost Angeles, Ca. usa
At this point this is my choice: wait six/seven months and await the next generation iPad and if nothing was released wait another six/five months.
Eduardo1971 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:55 PM   #19
commander.data
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack92029 View Post
It would be very interesting to see a side by side comparison of how the A6X compares to the new Samsung Exynos 5250
Anand's comparison already includes the Nexus 10 with Exynos 5250 and Mali-T604. The A6X and SGX554MP4 are ahead decisively.
commander.data is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:55 PM   #20
GorgonPhone
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by whooleytoo View Post
Incredible improvements in performance... From a gaming perspective, it'll be interesting to see how these compare with current-gen consoles, considering they're on ~10 year upgrade cycles and the iPad's last iteration lasted about 6 months.
they wont compare until apple offers an official proper controller cause the touch screen control are useless in most good games..
__________________
 2009 21" iMac  2011 MacBook Pro 13" i5 +  2006 21" HD Cinema Display
 iPhone4S 16Gig  iPhone5 16Gig  iPad3 16Gig
GorgonPhone is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:56 PM   #21
WilliamG
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by wackymacky View Post
What about iPhone 5 owners?

I might hold on to my 4s a little longer.
Why would iPhone 5 users be crying? The 5 is noticeably, noticeably faster than the 4S. The iPad 3 wasn't at all noticeably faster than the iPad 2 (heck, I didn't think it was at all faster). It comes as no surprise that Apple would refresh it.

The iPhone 5's GPU doesn't need to be anywhere near the speed of iPad 4's, since it's not pushing anywhere near that number of pixels.
__________________
iMac, MacBook Air, Mac mini, iPad, iPhone, 55-11
www.bighugenerd.com
WilliamG is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:58 PM   #22
Judas1
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
The ipad 4 sounds more awesome everyday. But if you buy the ipad 4, you'd only feel as bad when the slimmed down ipad 5 arrives. Nothing but heartaches in the tech game.
Judas1 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:58 PM   #23
AlanFord
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aluminum213 View Post
iPad 3 owners tears coming in 3...2...
No tears

ipad3 is a great product.
AlanFord is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:59 PM   #24
QCassidy352
macrumors G3
 
QCassidy352's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco
Quote:
Originally Posted by wackymacky View Post
What about iPhone 5 owners?I might hold on to my 4s a little longer.
Huh? iPhone 5 has far fewer pixels to push. It doesn't need nearly the graphics performance that the iPad does.
QCassidy352 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 02:05 PM   #25
shaown
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Soooo -
iPad 5 will probably bring a new pretty design, with similar (maybe slightly better internals). So people will cry - I want pretty design. But then iPad 6 willl come with new internals (A7x?) etc etc, and people will cry - but my iPad 5 was outdated when it came out!!!.

I am a happy iPad 3 owner - will consider the 5 when it comes out. Why - because 99% of apps will work fine on the iPad 3 for the next year or so, after all the Mini is just now out on a A5 base, and iPad 3 is about the same speed as the mini (considering A5x + retina). So I am not expecting any issues for the next 15 months or so. And I am on a 24 month refresh cycle.

Thanks,
-Shaown
shaown is offline   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imagination Technologies Announces PowerVR Series6XT Successor to Apple's A7 Chip Graphics MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 23 Jan 13, 2014 10:21 AM
Teardown of Fourth-Generation iPad Reveals LG Display, A6X Chip, Lightning Connector MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 90 Feb 13, 2013 08:53 PM
Apple Announces Fourth-Generation iPad with Lightning Connector, New A6X Chip MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 580 Dec 19, 2012 05:23 PM
iPad Mini: If iPad Mini had Retina Display and A6X chip, which would be better gaming device? irDigital0l iPad 21 Dec 17, 2012 02:26 AM
A6X Chip in the New iPad Eadfrith iPad 9 Oct 26, 2012 03:41 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC