Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 10, 2012, 03:57 PM   #26
xinu
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Finland
Quote:
Originally Posted by GermanyChris View Post
I was referring to now about the power7 chips..

Does IBM currently have the production capability to keep Apple in chips along with it's other commitments?
I believe IBM has all the production capability in the world if they choose to have. Almost 500.000 employees and 200 billion market cap with no bubbles in their stock. Been around since 1888 and they sure aren't leaving the business Not even Lehman Brothers catastrophe did not drop their stock value at all. Strong, strong company.

But I think Apple will stick with X86 because it makes Apple computers Windows combatible too.
xinu is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2012, 04:26 PM   #27
SkyBell
macrumors 603
 
SkyBell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by xinu View Post
I believe IBM has all the production capability in the world if they choose to have. Almost 500.000 employees and 200 billion market cap with no bubbles in their stock. Been around since 1888 and they sure aren't leaving the business Not even Lehman Brothers catastrophe did not drop their stock value at all. Strong, strong company.

But I think Apple will stick with X86 because it makes Apple computers Windows combatible too.
Exactly. Apple could quite easily switch back to PPC anytime they wanted, and I'd bet IBM would be more than happy to have them back, but the advantage of natively running Windows is too big to do it. You'd either have to go back to dealing with emulation, or buy a PC. Apple isn't stupid, they'd much rather you spend your money on a Mac only, and be able to run both OS's instead of maybe cheaping out on their hardware a bit to afford another PC.
__________________
MR's PowerPC Fangirl
eMac 1.42 GHz - 10.4.11
Pink iPod mini 2G 4 GB
R.I.P Apple Computer, 1976-2007
SkyBell is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2012, 05:47 PM   #28
xinu
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Finland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassie View Post
Exactly. Apple could quite easily switch back to PPC anytime they wanted, and I'd bet IBM would be more than happy to have them back, but the advantage of natively running Windows is too big to do it. You'd either have to go back to dealing with emulation, or buy a PC. Apple isn't stupid, they'd much rather you spend your money on a Mac only, and be able to run both OS's instead of maybe cheaping out on their hardware a bit to afford another PC.
In my Perfect Wold (tm)

- Macbooks with 8-core ARM cpu with thunderbolt external GPU power and 24hr battery life and antiglare retina displays

- MacPros with IBM Power8 cpus with 128 threads, most powerful desktop computer in the world (again)

- OS XI x86 (retail hackintosh) for 99 dollars and 99% combatible with post year 2006 PC:s that would eat nicely Windows market shares
xinu is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2012, 03:38 AM   #29
GermanyChris
macrumors 68040
 
GermanyChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Here
Quote:
Originally Posted by xinu View Post
I believe IBM has all the production capability in the world if they choose to have. Almost 500.000 employees and 200 billion market cap with no bubbles in their stock. Been around since 1888 and they sure aren't leaving the business Not even Lehman Brothers catastrophe did not drop their stock value at all. Strong, strong company.

But I think Apple will stick with X86 because it makes Apple computers Windows combatible too.
I understand all this, especially as an IBM shareholder. Last I recall IBM sells all the chips they make. I just don't know if they have the immediate capacity to take Apple as a client. I'm sure given a year or two it wouldn't be an issue.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassie View Post
Exactly. Apple could quite easily switch back to PPC anytime they wanted, and I'd bet IBM would be more than happy to have them back, but the advantage of natively running Windows is too big to do it. You'd either have to go back to dealing with emulation, or buy a PC. Apple isn't stupid, they'd much rather you spend your money on a Mac only, and be able to run both OS's instead of maybe cheaping out on their hardware a bit to afford another PC.
But I believe Windows 8 will run on more than x86.
__________________
The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad--Nietzsche
GermanyChris is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2012, 06:48 PM   #30
SkyBell
macrumors 603
 
SkyBell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by GermanyChris View Post
I understand all this, especially as an IBM shareholder. Last I recall IBM sells all the chips they make. I just don't know if they have the immediate capacity to take Apple as a client. I'm sure given a year or two it wouldn't be an issue.

----------



But I believe Windows 8 will run on more than x86.
I've heard there will be an ARM version, but I've heard nothing about PPC. There's not a whole lot of consumer OS's that do these days.
__________________
MR's PowerPC Fangirl
eMac 1.42 GHz - 10.4.11
Pink iPod mini 2G 4 GB
R.I.P Apple Computer, 1976-2007
SkyBell is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2012, 01:15 AM   #31
GermanyChris
macrumors 68040
 
GermanyChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassie View Post
I've heard there will be an ARM version, but I've heard nothing about PPC. There's not a whole lot of consumer OS's that do these days.
I'd heard ARM also.

Windows 8 is written for two architectures leopard was written for two also. When Windows 9 and 10.10 rolls around it might just need to be ARM and Power.

None of this stuff is really realistic, but I also don't know what benefit PowerPC has over x86 even for the workstation/server market especially for Apple.
__________________
The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad--Nietzsche
GermanyChris is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2012, 04:38 PM   #32
skinniezinho
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portugal
Send a message via MSN to skinniezinho
Quote:
Originally Posted by jchase2057 View Post
actually anything to sell an iOS device is very appleish. Cool either way though.
Guess you are correct, no new safari for 10.5
__________________
Powermac G4 @1.2GHz/2Gb/Gforce 6200/Samsung 500Gb/NEC 930SB /Apple Pro Kb+ Logitech M505
Thinkpad X230/256Gb SSD/16Gb Ram + Dell U2312Hm
F.A.Q for PowerPC Macs
skinniezinho is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2012, 05:45 PM   #33
cjmillsnun
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mabaker View Post
They update the software where the money is. Kind of pathetic but brilliant from a marketing point of view.
And the last ppc Mac was made how long ago?
__________________
rMBP Mid '12 2.6 GHz, 8GB, 512GB, OSX 10.8.3; iPhone 4 S 16GB
27" iMac Late '09 C2D 3.06 GHz, 4GB, 1TB, OSX 10.8.3
MacBook Early '09 2.0 GHz, 2GB, 250GB, OSX 10.8.3
cjmillsnun is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2012, 06:46 PM   #34
Nermal
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
Nermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whakatane, New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassie View Post
Exactly. Apple could quite easily switch back to PPC anytime they wanted, and I'd bet IBM would be more than happy to have them back, but the advantage of natively running Windows is too big to do it.
Or have a PPC chip alongside an Intel, a bit like the old "DOS compatible" Quadras
Nermal is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2012, 06:56 PM   #35
QuarterSwede
macrumors 604
 
QuarterSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjmillsnun View Post
And the last ppc Mac was made how long ago?
Exactly. Apple supported PPC (somewhat still does) for as long as the Intel transition lasted. They get a small bad rap because OS X is being compared to Microsoft still supporting some really old legacy stuff in Windows. However, that's to the detriment to Windows and most users who have moved on.
__________________
Help stop children from viewing internet pornography.
"Next to the Word of God, the noble art of music is the greatest treasure in the world." -- Martin Luther
QuarterSwede is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2012, 07:10 PM   #36
joepunk
macrumors 68020
 
joepunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: a profane existence
Send a message via AIM to joepunk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nova77 View Post
Have you tried CorePlayer yet? I bought it a while ago because it was the only way I could play HD animes on my Powerbook G4 1.67 ghz. It's $20 but I encourage any PPC user to buy it because it does miracles compared to VLC or quicktime. Maybe if enough PPC users buy it, they will still support us on the next update?...
I haven't tried CorePlayer. Though I bet at some point in the pastish I have read about it but never gave it much thought. Until know. Thanks.
__________________
15" Al PB revB G4 1.5ghz/2gbRam/320gbHD/128vram 10.5.8
iMac G3 333mhz/128mbRam/6gbHD

Flickr
joepunk is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 13, 2012, 12:24 AM   #37
pistooli
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hungary
Quote:
Originally Posted by joepunk View Post
I haven't tried CorePlayer. Though I bet at some point in the pastish I have read about it but never gave it much thought. Until know. Thanks.
While the thread went slightly off topic

I also did buy CorePlayer just recetly. I does indeed play 720p content almost without dropped frames on my iBook. Which is nice.
__________________
MacBook Air, 13", Mid 2012, Mountain Lion
Mac Mini, Late 2006, upgraded to 2GHz, 2GB, Lion 10.7.5
iBook G4, 1.42 MHz, 1.5 GB, 160 GB, Leopard
PowerBook 5300cs, 3400c, G3 Pismo, Mac Mini G4 1,33
pistooli is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 13, 2012, 09:39 PM   #38
SkippyThorson
macrumors 65816
 
SkippyThorson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Utica, NY
Send a message via AIM to SkippyThorson
Just to get this thread back on topic, I want to express my thrill for a new PPC update to iTunes. We really are still loved.
__________________
Skippy Thorson @ Blogspot
AT&T iPhone 4S, 4 & 2G, iPad 2, iPad 3G, v5.5 iPod, v3 & v2 Nano, v1 Shuffle, TV2
2.4ghz Al. MacBook, 1.33ghz iBook G4, 1.25ghz & 800mhz iMac G4s, AEBS
SkippyThorson is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2012, 11:58 AM   #39
petisjioweelsha
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by pistooli View Post
our beloved ppc is not completely forgotten by Apple.

the new iTunes 10.6 is available via Software Update
I just did a clean install of Leopard onto a Titanium PowerBook G4 and Software Update has not offered any updates for iTunes. We still have iTunes 7.x.
Makes me winde if SU missed any other important stuff...
petisjioweelsha is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2012, 12:11 PM   #40
eyoungren
macrumors 65816
 
eyoungren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Send a message via AIM to eyoungren Send a message via MSN to eyoungren Send a message via Yahoo to eyoungren Send a message via Skype™ to eyoungren
Never mind…
__________________
17" PBG4: 1GHZ, 2GB RAM, 100GB HD • 17" PBG4 DLSD-HD: 1.67 GHZ, 2GB RAM, 320GB HD | LEOPARD OSX 10.5.8
iPhone 5: BLACK, 64GB, SPRINT, EVERYTHING DATA FAMILY PLAN (Unlimited)

eyoungren is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2012, 01:54 PM   #41
seveej
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Could this

Quote:
Originally Posted by petisjioweelsha View Post
I just did a clean install of Leopard onto a Titanium PowerBook G4 and Software Update has not offered any updates for iTunes. We still have iTunes 7.x.
Makes me winde if SU missed any other important stuff...
be related to this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pistooli View Post
Macintosh Hardware

Mac computer with an Intel, PowerPC G5 or G4 processor and 512MB of RAM
To play Standard Definition video from the iTunes Store, a 1.0GHz PowerPC G4 or faster processor and 512MB of RAM is required
To play 720p HD video, an iTunes LP, or iTunes Extras, a 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo or faster processor and 1GB of RAM is required
To play 1080p HD video, a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo or faster processor and 2GB of RAM is required
Screen resolution of 1024x768 or greater; 1280x800 or greater is required to play an iTunes LP or iTunes Extras
Broadband Internet connection to use the iTunes Store
Apple combo drive or SuperDrive to create audio, MP3, or back-up CDs; some non-Apple CD-RW recorders may also work
Apple SuperDrive to back up your library to DVDs; some non-Apple DVD-RW drives may also work

Macintosh Software

Mac OS X version 10.5.8 or later
Safari 4.0.3 or later
200MB of available disk space
iTunes in the Cloud and iTunes Match availability may vary by country
RGDS,
Pekka
__________________
MP 3,1 Octo
MBP 13" 2,66 C2D, 8GB, 160SSD
MDD, 1Ghz DP, 2GB, 4.25 TB (Leopard Server)
seveej is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2012, 08:25 PM   #42
petisjioweelsha
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Unless I am confused, the Titanium G4 PwerBook meets the requirements.
It is a 1Ghz PPC G4 with 1GB RAM and several gigs of free space. It has 10.5.8 and Safari 5.0.6

It seems like Software Update has missed iTune and perhaps some other stuff.
Any ideas on how to get this fixed.
petisjioweelsha is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 04:13 AM   #43
pistooli
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hungary
you can download iTunes 10.6.3 from Apple directly.

System requirements:
Mac computer with an Intel, PowerPC G5 or G4 processor and 512MB of RAM
__________________
MacBook Air, 13", Mid 2012, Mountain Lion
Mac Mini, Late 2006, upgraded to 2GHz, 2GB, Lion 10.7.5
iBook G4, 1.42 MHz, 1.5 GB, 160 GB, Leopard
PowerBook 5300cs, 3400c, G3 Pismo, Mac Mini G4 1,33
pistooli is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 02:02 PM   #44
petisjioweelsha
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by pistooli View Post
you can download iTunes 10.6.3 from Apple directly.

System requirements:
Mac computer with an Intel, PowerPC G5 or G4 processor and 512MB of RAM
Yeah, I was just surprised that Software Update didn't offer it (as well as a few other updates)...
petisjioweelsha is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finally! Sync your Address CardDav in OSX 10.6 Snow Leopard bm2amb iCloud and Apple services 82 Jul 1, 2012 06:07 AM
Considering going back to 10.6... ppdix Mac OS X 10.7 Lion 21 Aug 16, 2011 11:08 PM
Downgrading to 10.6 without losing data -BigMac- Mac OS X 10.7 Lion 1 May 31, 2011 02:28 AM
10.6.4 to 10.6.6 MAIL problems loungecorps Mac Pro 3 Jan 9, 2011 11:34 AM
Snow Leopard impossible install! sphoenix Mac OS X 5 Nov 18, 2010 06:57 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC