|
|
#1 |
|
Wiring the house for Ethernet/Gigabit?
Hi,
so we are having a considerable extension and some work on the house done over the next few months and at some point soon we have to have the conversation with the Architect about what kind of ports we want to put in around the house. I just wanted some advice on what I should be asking for with regards to the Ethernet ports as its something I understand very little about. Importantly I want to future proof it so even if its speed/tech that wouldnt be used by my devices now, its important that its there for future use as long as theres no negatives to consider. Thats when the question of Gigabit ethernet comes in ? I dont understand anything about it and what I would loose out if I simply said "I want gigabit ethernet ports through the whole house". So if someone could please clarify for me. what would I need in addition to have this all on the same network? many thanks in advance Some background to what devices will be in use Study/Office -> ( need at least 3 Ethernet ports) iMac x 2 ( 2011 & 2012 ) Synerlogy Nas drive x 1 TV room -> (need at least 4, preferably 5 ports) TV Apple TV PS3 Xbox Sky Living room -> (need 2 ports) Heres where my Virgin Broadband router is located, which has 4 ethernet ports.w Sky Box x 1 Spare room -> ( 1 port just in case) no devices currently |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Simply put "flood wire" the place with Cat 6 standard cable and points, all coming back to a chosen point, perhaps a cupboard that also has power and your cable/phone/sat/tv terminations/supply points.
The cable is cheap, if you think 2-3 points are enough now after a year it won't be.
__________________
Long time lurker.... |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I put ethernet ports into our new house. And use them far less than I thought I would. YMMV, of course. What I think I really should have done - and this is my advice to you.... I wish I had put conduits into every room intead. Then you are not tied to ethernet. In the next few years optical Thunderbolt may be released. Or you might decide you need to put coaxial cabling into a room. If you can swing it, put the conduit in. For now you can put ethernet cables into the conduit.
When I do use ethernet, it's wonderful. All cables come to a common point and connect to Gigabit switch. We are using Cat5e (I think have the notation correct?) and it's working at or near gigabit speeds (1000 Mbs vs the regular 100 Mbs) - I'm sure someone will correct my abbreviations. Luck. And Congratulations on the addition.
__________________
My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world. - Jack Layton |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The comment about running conduit makes the most sense. I ran wire under my addition, on top of a slab, and after reading that comment, not regret that I didn't think of conduit.
I have ethernet cable, TOSLink, telephone and speakercable all running underneath the floors and through the walls, but thinking back, a couple of empty conduit pipes would have futureproofed the space. |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Many thanks for your very helpful replies. Just to elaborate on conduits , are these essentially pipes we can feed different wiring through if required in future ?
Also would I essentially be placing the gigabit switch next to my router / or my mac? (if it was compatible) |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I was about to do the same thing and wire up my house with ethernet, but it would have involved extra work (since I wasn't getting something else done like the OP is). However, I decided to give PowerLine networking a go and found that it's actually very capable now; it just uses your regular power cables as a network (currently up to 500Mbps shared between all devices). You even get some neat replacement wall sockets with built in ethernet, rather than having to use adapters; however it is fairly pricey compared to ethernet cabling.
Since you're getting work done anyway then ethernet cabling probably is the better option though as it's cheap, and currently much faster. I'm not sure about the quantity of cables you'd need; personally I would just do one cable per room, maybe two in a study so you've got a choice of sockets (one each in two corners for example). Your network has to pass through a switch at some point, so routing extra cables really only means you'll need a bigger switch (or multiple switches) wherever they meet up (e.g - under stair cupboard or whatever). You can get 4-port gigabit ethernet switches extremely cheaply these days so personally I'd just aim for single ethernet port wall sockets and slap a switch onto any that are being used for multiple machines, this way you don't need a really high capacity switch as a hub, which hopefully means you can get a lower capacity one with QoS which I think will be better overall. Conduits definitely seem like the smart choice regardless of what you put in; they're just "tubes" that you can run cables through fairly easily, try not to get any that are too narrow though as I have one in my house and it's a bloody pain to get cables through ![]() You can buy ones that go on your walls, if you can put them inside the walls or under the floor instead then it's much neater.
__________________
"Early 2008" MacPro, 2 x 3.2ghz Quad-Core Xeons, 10gb DDR2 800mhz ECC RAM, 120gb Solid State Drive (Mac & Windows OS), 4 x 750gb hard-drives (striped, users/files), NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb). |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Quote:
My recommendation: Find a little closet or space to put certain devices which don't require you to constantly look at. Move the router, switch, synology, etc into that space. Some networking devices have small fans which get noisy and placing your infrastructure devices in 1 location allow you to provide better physical and environmental controls. Then you have: Study/Office -> ( need at least 2 Ethernet ports) iMac x 2 ( 2011 & 2012 ) TV room -> (need at least 4, preferably 5 ports) consider a local small switch for this instead. TV Apple TV PS3 Xbox Sky Living room -> (need 1 ports) Sky Box x 1 Spare room -> ( 1 port just in case) no devices currently Closet -> minimum 8 ports out, coax in for the modem Synerlogy Nas drive x 1 Virgin Router Switch Battery Backup for networking
__________________
2012 11" MBA i7/8/256 2011 Mac Mini with 27" Thunderbolt Display Black iPad Mini 32GB Verizon Black iPhone 5 32GB ATT
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
You might save yourself a bit of trouble by only having one port in each desired room, then having standalone small gigabit switches in rooms you need more than one port. I do this and it works great in my office and home theatre.
__________________
2012 15" Macbook Pro 16GB RAM/256GB SSD; iPad 4 - Black; iPhone 5 - Black; Synology DS411+II NAS 12TB |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Thanks guys all replies very helpfull.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I've done this kind of thing twice -- both times with the walls/ceilings/floors open.
Conduits are an excellent suggestion. Make sure the electrician leaves at least one and preferably two "strings" in each conduit (used to pull new cable, if needed). I'd wire with CAT 6 or 6e now, and maybe you won't need to rewire. But if you want to seriously future-proof, pull fiber. I have several rooms with multiple ethernet ports, one on each wall. I don't like to string cables all around from a switch or multi-port wall plate. And if you change the room arrangement, you could have an ugly cable mess. So I'd say that for every room where you might think you need more than one, or where you might move work/entertainment locations around, get a port on every wall. If you were wiring after the fact that might not be cost-effective, but when it's all open, it's easy and should be cheap. Having everything come to a central point is tremendously useful. You can put patch panels there, so that you don't have to have an available ethernet connection for each outlet. For example, in my wiring closet I have 24 cables running out to the rooms, but only one 8 port gigabit switch. I never need more than 8 active at once. When I move a device, I just change one patch cable and it's done. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Quote:
Run gigabit. But run what you need. If you need 6 run 6 not 1 and put a switch in. It will hamper your download speeds. Use 1/2 or 3/8 conduit. 1/2 you can get maybe 6-8 Cat5. 5-6 cat6e. Some people might think this isn't a lot for the conduit but there is a proper way of doing it and the cheap way of doing it. Do it the proper way. You want to make sure your cable is loose in the conduit not tight. If you have a D-mark for your phone that your phone company put in, I'd run everything to there. I wouldn't do it in the living room. An central area that is easy to access and you can put it on the wall and make it look nice. Gigabit switches are becoming cheaper and cheaper as they become more common. I bought a 24 port for my house. Only needed 12. And I got it for around $200. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 |
|
If you run a single outlet to each room, and branch off from there, you are putting a bandwidth cap on room-to-room data transfers.
This might not be a problem today, but in the near future you might saturate the network while streaming video and have no room to grow. Especially if you put in a central server for media or backups, etc. I always run a couple extra lines, but just put in the required number of outlets. But should expansion be needed in the future, the wiring is just behind the cover plate. Plus, Cat5e is being used for HDMI and anything else you can think of now. It never hurts to have more cable in the walls. |
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.








2012 11" MBA i7/8/256
Linear Mode
