I simply asked what netbook has a full sized keyboard.
My original point was meant to be that it had a full fledged (i.e. actual) keyboard with full sized keys, not really a "full sized" one meaning "with numeric keypad" or apparently gauging by this reply you seem to really want a certain measured spacing between the keys (it's so hard to tell when you cannot stop yourself from posting sarcastic, nasty or obnoxious comments at the same time as you attempt to communicate). When it seemed apparent you wanted to mean a full blown home computer sized keyboard, I simply pointed out you can plug one in (since obviously no netbook or even most notebooks have anything approaching desktop sized keyboards on them. At best they have full sized keys. Apple has taken to use different type keys entirely on their newer computers, but ALL are preferable to a "virtual" keyboard like an iPad has, in my opinion.
You responded with a rant about tablet usage.
Do you even know what a "rant" is? Two sentences are not a "RANT" in any part of the known Universe and thus how else can I take your post but to be trolling? Re-read your reply and see it for what it is. It's downright obnoxious and I'm not the only one to say so.
As for tablet usage, this thread is about tablets putting Netbooks out of business and hence my comments in the thread that you chose to reply to.
I admit I have not measured the spacing of the keys on my Netbook to see if they comply with your definition of "full size" but they do appear to be quite similar at a glance to the relative dimensions as my Macbook Pro so I can either conclude that my Macbook Pro 15" notebook doesn't have a full sized keyboard either or that you are simply too picky about using notebook keyboards. No, they aren't spaced exactly like an external keyboard. But neither are they reduced sized keys that I find hard to type on.
As for logic, responding to a question about built-in parts by saying you can plug one in hardly computes to me. But, whatever your brain calls logic is fine for you. Don't call me a troll for a simple question. If you want to put words in my mouth, do it to yourself, not in public.
How would you reply to someone using sarcastic, obnoxious, insulting language? Oh that's right. You are the one perpetuating it. Use whatever words you like. It doesn't change your attitude on here.
And yes, it does matter to me that I can plug a mouse and external keyboard into my Netbook since Apple doesn't afford me such a luxury on my iOS devices (save bluetooth on newer ones; my older 1st gen iPod Touch has no such option).
I will back up your assesement of his posts, having suffered the same thing in a discussion about Unix with him.
I don't recall the particulars too well nor do I wish to look them up, but it seems you were arguing endlessly that OSX wasn't "UNIX" despite its Open Group certification as such and despite the history (that Dennis Ritchie refers to as "genetic") of UNIX before AT&T and BSD split off from the Bell Labs code.
Dennis Ritchie (one of the creators of the original UNIX) has three categories of UNIX and OSX meets TWO of the three ("Genetic UNIX" since it's underpinnings are from BSD which was based on the
original Bell Labs code even if since modified or replaced and also "Certified/Branded" UNIX because it's OpenGroup certified (at least for 10.5 10.6 and 10.8; they apparently didn't bother to certify Lion for reasons unknown); the third category is "functional" and that's every "unix-like" thing out there). Mac OSX is the only BSD-based code to be certified, but that doesn't change the fact is IS now certified to be Single UNIX System 3 compliant. Everything I just said is a 100% verifiable FACT and I can post any number of references if you need/want them, but they're not hard to find. But you kept insisting that OSX is NOT UNIX when it IS. You were flat out WRONG by every possible definition there is for the above reasons. You will NEVER admit you're wrong because you are incapable of it.
And that is your entire problem and the reason you consistently got -30 or less ratings in the days of negative voting because you are constantly behaving in an obnoxious, insulting and generally overbearing manner in nearly every post you make. One cannot have a proper conversation with someone like that as it ends in either long protracted arguments that never cease (since you MUST have the last word even when you're dead wrong) or it ends with you putting me on ignore and declaring to everyone around you that you simply CANNOT talk to such an ignorant person as myself even when you were wrong from day one on the topic.
Seeing as I am supposedly on your ignore (amazing how you keep seeing my posts to respond to them, though), you will supposedly not read this. Oh well. But perhaps it will enlighten all those frustrated with trying to talk any sense to you in any number of threads where I see your endless talking down to people to "educate the ignorant" or "dare to tell them they're wrong" or whatever it is you wish to call your apparent need to talk down to people.