|
|
#126 | |
|
Quote:
![]() Yes, if you make up terrible flaws that are worse than what the OP posted, yeah, those would be bad. But no, I'm not going to complain about a spot on my car that can only be seen with a macro camera lens. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#127 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Technically, it's a $849 phone. He bought a 64gb version. So, $849 Retail. $399 Subsidized. Either way its a $849 device.
Personally, I've never been affected by any of the "defects" that people have complained about every year with any of my Apple products. But I haven't won the lottery either so it can't all be luck.
__________________
Rock, Paper, Scissors, Lizard, Spock |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Everyone has a different theory of what "acceptable" is. To some, minor scratches that take a telescope to spot are a deal breaker. To others, major issues are only a concern. I think it really comes down to one simple question: Is it supposed to be like that? If it isn't, then there's your answer as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't return a phone based on the little scratches the OP showed us, but dust under the camera lens is a deal breaker for me.
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#130 | |
|
Quote:
![]() Like all manufactured items there will be flaws, I kinda see threads like this as petty complaining but to each their own. I'm sure if I look hard enough I can find a flaw or two on my iPhone 5, but honestly it works and does what I need it to so I really don't care to waste my time doing so.
__________________
"Shine Get!" |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#131 |
|
When I bought my new tC, the paint was defective in places, like by the Scion badge. Weird white residue that wouldn't come off. But it was so minor, I didn't care.
Same thing with the OP. Grow up and move on. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
iPad 4 2012 MBA
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#133 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Apple doesn't run flashy ads littered with asterisks noting dead pixels, dust under the front glass, backlight bleed, chassis imperfections, and so forth are included in the list of features. Saying they are within design tolerances or that "no reasonable person would object," or some other sort of claim, is really a euphemism for saying these are features as a matter of the total package of properties a consumer can expect to face. However, I think most people wouldn't consider any of those things to be objectives set as a matter of design target, or what people have in mind when they think of essential properties of the product. Thus, they are most accurately classified as defects. So, left with us is a question of how to approach that fact...
Apple advertises a premium product, and sells that product at a premium price, within the confines of a product ecosystem that is routinely promoted as being developed around exacting standards. Furthermore consumers, including on this forum, frequently cite build quality as a reason to buy Apple products. Based on these factors, it seems reasonable to me for people to expect to receive individual units that reflect the image promoted by Apple and many of its brand enthusiasts. Some people may be less concerned with defects, but I don't see good reason to demand others adhere to those same standards. Or, in other words, spend more time being helpful and kind to each other and less time worrying about (or posting about) how you can't stand how selective some people are. |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Some of your issues are legit, but you do have mental problems. You need to get a life because you will get a heart arrack when a serious issue happens In your life. Perhaps you spent all your money on the phone so you expect perfection which deep down you know you will not attain, thus never technically buying the phone.
Plus what, you get a perfect phone, then next month it falls out of your hand and gets scratched. Then what? |
|
|
|
1
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.









iPad 4
Linear Mode
