|
|
#26 |
|
Back in the day, I used OmniWeb exclusively in MacOS X as it was one of the few browsers optimized for the OS. Eventually, I switched to Camino (anyone?) when OmniGroup slowed development.
Maybe I'll load it up for the memories... |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Quote:
---------- I did the reverse, because Camino fell way behind on today's needed filtering features. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Quote:
Agreed I can't understand why people still use Camino, it's ugly, it's slow, it's not the most secure and it's "barely in development" if it still is. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Quote:
Nope, that didn't work, sadly. Last edited by OLDCODGER; Jan 14, 2013 at 05:07 PM. Reason: report on Sizewell |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Hmmm I tried it on a Snow Leopard iMac at my work place and you're right.
It works perfectly in Mountain Lion and Lion though. Really strange.. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#31 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#32 |
|
On the idea of browser with page previews in the tabs, Opera does this in the way I've found myself to be the most comfortable. Opera retains traditional tabs, but when you roll your mouse over the tab, a preview of the webpage is displayed.
__________________
2012 Mac mini 2.6 GHz i7, 16 GB RAM 256 GB SSD; 23" ASUS LCD; iPod Touch 32 GB (4g) |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Quote:
Also I find the main function of the visual tabs are to easily find the tab you are looking for - having to hover over each tab is annoying (I know you can drag it down in opera to reveal visual tabs - but then you have a giant tray wasted space which looks fugly IMO. I personally think Roccat and OmniWeb are better - but I think Roccat has the edge as it's more customisable - can have normal tabs or visual tabs of any size at the top (like opera) but you can also have it in a drawer (like omniweb) or at the bottom or on the sizes. |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.








Linear Mode
