Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:30 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Blames Low Mac Sales on iMac Supply Constraints




Today's quarterly results call revealed that Apple's Mac sales are down 16% compared to last year. Apple sold just 312,000 Macs per week compared to 371,000 per week during the same time period a year ago.

Peter Oppenheimer noted that Apple has experienced significant constraints on the new iMacs, and was only able to ship them during December. Without these constraints, he says, Mac sales would have been higher.
Quote:
IDC estimates the global personal computer market contracted by 6% during the December quarter. We introduced the new 13-inch MacBook Pro retina display as well as our stunning new iMacs in October. As we projected a quarter ago, we were significantly constrained with respect to the new iMacs and were only able to ship them for the final month of the December quarter. We believe our Mac sales would have been much higher absent those constraints.
Apple was only able to provide 3 to 4 weeks of inventory, below its target of 4 to 5 weeks. Apple's newest iMacs have been plagued with production issues, mainly due to a new lamination process used for the displays.

Cook further addressed this in the Question and Answer section.
Quote:
The best way to answer this is to look at the previous year. The difference is $1.1 billion from last year. iMacs were down by 700k units year over year. As you remember, we announced new iMacs late in October. Announced they would ship in November and December. Did ship by those dates. Limited weeks of ramping on those products during the quarter. Significant constraints on the iMac at the end of the quarter. Sales would have been materially higher without those constraints. Tried to share this on the conference call in October.

If you look at last year, we had 14 weeks in the quarter last year. 13 weeks this year. Channel inventory was down from the beginning of the quarter by more than 100k units. Didn't have the iMacs in channel. These factors bridge more than the difference between this year's sales and last year's.
Cook also mentioned a few other minor factors, including the weak PC market and the impressive sales of the iPad. Apple sold more than 23 million iPads, and Cook said that some cannibalization was almost certainly a factor.


Article Link: Apple Blames Low Mac Sales on iMac Supply Constraints
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:32 PM   #2
simonb76
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Somehow I could see that coming considering most people are tight with their money in the present economy.
simonb76 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:32 PM   #3
2bcool2
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
i got an 27" iMac ! yayyyyyyyyyyy

i dont like the fusion drive ... i wanted a 256gb ssd ...... i hear it spinning up and down wtf
2bcool2 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:35 PM   #4
Brian Y
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
When Apple don't count it as a sale until it's shipped and payment taken - that's going to affect figures badly. I think we all knew this though :P.
Brian Y is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:35 PM   #5
Macmaniac
macrumors 68040
 
Macmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: A tiny spec in the "Garden State", 1 square mile in area, somewhere on the outskirts of town by the railroad tracks
If I were a Financial Analyst I would make millions predicting **** like this. As a normal person I look at the facts and draw the same conclusion. Amazing society we live in.
__________________
The customer is NOT always right
Macmaniac is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:36 PM   #6
Raftysworld
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
I feel like Steve wouldn't have allowed supply constraints like this to happen.
Raftysworld is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:36 PM   #7
StellarSoul
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Australia
I'd also say that the insanely high price for a retina MacBook Pro (with decent hard disk space) is as larger factor in the sales drop. If they introduce Haswell models with a price drop this year plus revamped Airs I'm sure sales will rebound.
StellarSoul is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:37 PM   #8
lifeinhd
macrumors 65816
 
lifeinhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 127.0.0.1
If they had a new Mac Pro, would be even higher
__________________
PowerBook G5, 1.67GHz MacBook Pro, iPhone Nano, iPhone 6, Apple Television Set
lifeinhd is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:38 PM   #9
mrsir2009
macrumors 604
 
mrsir2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
16% down is quite a lot though, and desktop Macs make up only a fraction of the sales of portable Macs...
mrsir2009 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:40 PM   #10
Brian Y
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by StellarSoul View Post
I'd also say that the insanely high price for a retina MacBook Pro (with decent hard disk space) is as larger factor in the sales drop. If they introduce Haswell models with a price drop this year plus revamped Airs I'm sure sales will rebound.
If that was the case - they wouldn't have seen such high demand at launch.

It's their top of the line product, it's going to be expensive - and you could say that about anything. If the 13" MBP was cheaper it'd sell more. But that's not what Apple do.
Brian Y is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:40 PM   #11
blackhand1001
macrumors 68030
 
blackhand1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
I am sorry but apple sells 10 times as many laptops as they do desktops. The imac is not the reason mac sales were down 22%.
__________________
Macbook 2008
HP Dv7t - 2.53 ghz, 9600m GT, WSXGA+, 120gb ssd, 250 gb 7200rpm
Core i7 3770k, 8gb ram, 2x 120gb sdd raid0, 500gb hdd, GTX 460
Moto X Dev Edition (VZW) Nexus 7
blackhand1001 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:41 PM   #12
mrsir2009
macrumors 604
 
mrsir2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by StellarSoul View Post
I'd also say that the insanely high price for a retina MacBook Pro (with decent hard disk space) is as larger factor in the sales drop. If they introduce Haswell models with a price drop this year plus revamped Airs I'm sure sales will rebound.
I reckon the sales would have been higher if the rMBP hadn't been released - As people who are in the market for a new MacBook Pro would opt to wait for the second gen retina, due to a price slash and first-gen bugs being ironed out. Once they bring out a second gen retina with a lower price tag, and possibly make the cMBP's a tad cheaper as well, sales will go way up.
mrsir2009 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:43 PM   #13
cameronjpu
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
The supposed supply chain genius engineered this problem.
cameronjpu is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:44 PM   #14
1Alec1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Democratic Republic of Congo, you racist!
BS.

- The new iMac has non-removeable RAM, a deterrent for some users. And the SD card slot is on the back, WTF.

- It took Apple ridiculously long to update the iMac. Dell can push out an update every 2 seconds. All they have to do is make the internal components NOT over a year old. No need to change the style, just update it.

- Apple clearly doesn't care about desktop computers. If you go to an Apple store, there's that one iMac in the corner while the posters on the wall and the ads all tell you to buy something else.
1Alec1 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:44 PM   #15
RoelJuun
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands
The new iMac is also ridiculously expensive. Last year models were pretty good price/performance for an AIO, the current need over-the-top expensive upgrades from Apple to make them great (Fusion/SSD). An iMac with SSD starts at 1635
RoelJuun is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:44 PM   #16
iBug2
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsir2009 View Post
I reckon the sales would have been higher if the rMBP hadn't been released - As people who are in the market for a new MacBook Pro would opt to wait for the second gen retina, due to a price slash and first-gen bugs being ironed out. Once they bring out a second gen retina with a lower price tag, and possibly make the cMBP's a tad cheaper as well, sales will go way up.
Their Laptop sales were fine. Their iMac sales were low.
__________________
MP Hex D700 32GB-1TB, rMBP 2.7 15" 16GB, ATD, iPhone 4S, iPad Air
iBug2 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:45 PM   #17
Peace
macrumors P6
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Space--The ONLY Frontier
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Alec1 View Post
BS.

- The new iMac has non-removeable RAM, a deterrent for some users.
- It took Apple forever to update the iMac. Dell can push out an update every 2 seconds. All they have to do is make the internal components NOT over a year old.
- Apple clearly doesn't care about desktop computers. If you go to an Apple store, there's that one iMac in the corner while the posters on the wall all tell you to buy something else.
You did hear that MS was putting 2 billion into Dell to go private right ?
Peace is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:48 PM   #18
iBug2
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhand1001 View Post
I am sorry but apple sells 10 times as many laptops as they do desktops. The imac is not the reason mac sales were down 22%.
They already said that the iMac sales were 700K less than last year. Yes that doesn't make the 1.1 million loss (assuming that the mac wouldn't shrink or grow), but still that's a lot. So what you mean is that the iMac isn't the only reason mac sales were down.
__________________
MP Hex D700 32GB-1TB, rMBP 2.7 15" 16GB, ATD, iPhone 4S, iPad Air
iBug2 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:50 PM   #19
nuckinfutz
macrumors 603
 
nuckinfutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoelJuun View Post
The new iMac is also ridiculously expensive. Last year models were pretty good price/performance for an AIO, the current need over-the-top expensive upgrades from Apple to make them great (Fusion/SSD). An iMac with SSD starts at 1635
They are the same price in the US when you account for today's models all come with 8GB of RAM standard.
nuckinfutz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:50 PM   #20
mrsir2009
macrumors 604
 
mrsir2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Y View Post
If that was the case - they wouldn't have seen such high demand at launch.

It's their top of the line product, it's going to be expensive - and you could say that about anything. If the 13" MBP was cheaper it'd sell more. But that's not what Apple do.
The price of the Retina MBP is going to come down significantly, though. I mean, look at the MacBook Air... Since it's been released the price has been slashed by $300, for the 13" model.
mrsir2009 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:51 PM   #21
nuckinfutz
macrumors 603
 
nuckinfutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Alec1 View Post
BS.

- The new iMac has non-removeable RAM, a deterrent for some users. And the SD card slot is on the back, WTF.

- It took Apple ridiculously long to update the iMac. Dell can push out an update every 2 seconds. All they have to do is make the internal components NOT over a year old. No need to change the style, just update it.

- Apple clearly doesn't care about desktop computers. If you go to an Apple store, there's that one iMac in the corner while the posters on the wall and the ads all tell you to buy something else.
No one but geeks are ranting about non-removable RAM or the SD card slot. The biggest complaint or at least concern is the lack of a DVD drive.
nuckinfutz is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:53 PM   #22
neiltc13
macrumors 68040
 
neiltc13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
This doesn't make any sense. The new Mac Pro was released last quarter and it included a great new CPU and GPU upgrade. So many people switched because of the machine's great power and price.
neiltc13 is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:57 PM   #23
1Alec1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Democratic Republic of Congo, you racist!
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuckinfutz View Post
No one but geeks are ranting about non-removable RAM or the SD card slot. The biggest complaint or at least concern is the lack of a DVD drive.
Who uses DVDs? Anyone who uses a camera (except for Sony cameras) uses an SD card and probably wants to put the card in the computer. Anyone who knows what RAM is probably doesn't want to pay the Apple price for it.
1Alec1 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:57 PM   #24
nagromme
macrumors G4
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
I'm glad there's a company like Apply betting big on risky new design and manufacturing technologies... sometimes getting burned (like these low iMac supplies) and sometimes succeeding in a big way (milled aluminum casings across the board).

It's easy to just make whatever has worked before. But without this kind of innovation and risk-taking, we'd lose out on a lot.

(PREDICTION: someone will forget that we're talking about display lamination, and ask how "innovative" I think it is to make a DVD player optional I'll answer now: I think it's not innovative, merely a good move.)
nagromme is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2013, 04:58 PM   #25
cxny
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Low Mac Sales; Really?

This is probably the biggest surprise of the numbers at least to me. What happened to the "Halo Effect"? It can't be explained by just the delay in production on iMac. All the recent news has been about iPhone sales but if Apple can no longer produce compelling computers then Cupertino, we have a problem.
cxny is offline   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Retina iPad Mini Shipping Times Lengthening at Major U.S. Carriers Amid Supply Constraints MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 50 Nov 22, 2013 02:28 PM
Any word on supply constraints? andymac2210 iPhone 1 Sep 15, 2013 01:35 AM
Apple Still Seeing Strong Mac Sales Growth Amid Easing iMac Constraints MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 93 Mar 20, 2013 10:47 PM
Have iphone launches always had supply constraints? IUBall22 iPhone 5 Oct 1, 2012 09:54 PM
How long will supply constraints last? IUBall22 iPhone 4 Sep 27, 2012 09:05 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC