|
|
#26 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#27 | |||
|
Quote:
![]() I'll look into it on Monday when we have more people around to ask questions. Do note that 1PasswordAnywhere is local. In that it never sends data to Dropbox, it merely requests the various .1password files to decrypt them locally in the browser. ---------- Quote:
With 1Password 4 we also offer USB syncing (beta right now) so that you can just plug your device in, run the app and sync your data without it ever touching the network. We try to provide the best options we can given the size of our small team. ---------- Quote:
We are not aware of any holes in the encryption or weak points in the application that could be exploited and we do our best to make breaking into 1Password's data as difficult as possible using industry standard encryption. Last edited by AGKyle; Feb 18, 2013 at 10:07 AM. |
||||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Quote:
By contrast... 1Password is fully encrypted on your own computer... and even if you choose to share your database... nobody else has your key to decrypt your data. They key is private to you. /Jim |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Thanks for all your replies. I bought the iOS version for 1Password and let it run on my iPhone. Not sure if I should get into that cloud syncing thing. If I decided to do that, what would be the better option? iCould or Dropbox?
The 1Password app for Mac comes with quite a hefty price tag. But without using the syncing function (version 4 for Mac with iCloud syncing), maybe that's not of interest anyway at the moment. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#30 |
|
I think you meant iCloud and not iCould
![]() I prefer Dropbox simply because I can use 1Password on my windows box and so with DropBox I have cross platform syncing.
__________________
I know that I know nothing ~ Socrates |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Quote:
In most countries there are laws about how to store certain kinds of data. In case of banks it has to be encrypted. However, since anybody can get to data on the internet one must assume that data stored on the internet is compromised already. Let's not forget that it is very difficult to know when your data has been compromised. Most companies tend to keep security leaks/breaches a secret because they fear for their reputation. It's one of the reasons why some countries are thinking about making it mandatory to report such leaks/breaches. It can also take quite some time before a hack is even noticed. That's why you should always assume that data on the internet is already compromised when you put it there. It is up to you as the owner of the passwords to decide if the 1Password encryption (or any other application and/or encryption) is enough. Not everything requires military grade encryption even the NSA drools on
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Quote:
The short answer is "no". We are not aware of any case in which 1Password has been compromised. There have been a small handful of cases where people suspected that 1Password had been compromised, but these all turned out to be false alarms. We've cases where people have written in suspecting that their 1Password data has been compromised. After asking for details, we learned that the people had only one password compromised which they had used over an insecure WiFi. (One, if I recall, had been in a coffee shop, another had been is a public library. These were to services that did not force SSL connections.) We've also seen a couple of reports in which people were scared because their anti-virsus software reported 1Password data files as infected. Anti-virus scanners are correctly suspicious of encrypted data, but over reacted in terms of 1Password data. There have been cases where malware, DevilRobber, collected (encrypted) 1Password data (along with lots of other data including OS X keychains) and shipped it back to whoever controlled the malware. We wrote about that here: http://blog.agilebits.com/2011/11/17...rd-harvesters/ The answer to that one, is that we've designed 1Password with the knowledge that some people would have their 1Password data files stolen, whether through having their computers stolen, their computers compromised, or compromises on synching services. The data format is designed to keep your secrets safe even if bad guys do get hold of your 1Password data file. Cheers, -j Last edited by dejo; Feb 18, 2013 at 05:00 PM. Reason: Removed simulated signature. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#33 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also, there is privacy legislation. Canadian banks have had to bring all of their domestic banking computing back into Canada because other nations could not guarantee that their police and intelligence services wouldn't want to peek at client's personal information (with or without a warrant.) I suspect other nation's banks have had to deal with similar situations, and don't in fact contract out their cloud services to 3rd parties in other nations. imho, of course....
__________________
My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world. - Jack Layton |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Quote:
That is a great, but tricky question. It really depends on the fine details of the nature of the data corruption. 1Password has a conflict resolution mechanisms in these sync operations (mostly to deal with when changes to an item have been made on multiple systems before changes could be synchronized.) In general, 1Password will try to do the right thing. 1Password will try to merge the data from the different sync sources. Corrupt data (if it is detected as such) should never "win" over valid data in a merge conflict. I don't want to promise specific behavior without knowing the very particular nature of the data corruption. (Actually I don't want to promise any specific behavior about conflict resolution and data corruption as these are things that are continually being improved.) So sorry for the vague answer. We've tried to design 1Password to behave intelligently in the face of data corruption, but the details get tricky. If you've got more questions about this, I'd like to ask you to join our support forums, where you will definitely get a response and see others discussing similar issues. Cheers, -j Last edited by dejo; Feb 18, 2013 at 04:59 PM. Reason: Removed simulated signature. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Quote:
As we move forward with more focus on data authentication, 1PasswordAnywhere remains the odd man out. So we've definitely been looking at stuff like this. We've looked at possible approaches, including posting checksums on our website for what the 1Password.html file should yield, but we haven't actually done that yet. I don't think that a GPG signature would be that useful as the circumstances in which someone had GPG available with an appropriate set of public keys that they could trust would be circumstances in which they could use the 1Password applications themselves. We want to make security easy to use and broadly accessible; having people use GPG doesn't really meet that goal. I'd really like to encourage you to post about this on our forums. I'd like to get a better sense of what sorts of mechanisms (potential) 1Password users would be comfortable using to ensure that the 1PasswordAnywhere files haven't been tampered with. Cheers, -j –- Jeffrey Goldberg Chief Defender Against the Dark Arts @ AgileBits http://agilebits.com |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Just tonight I found the first issue with 1Password. I got a new MBP for work, so I set everything up, and I have been using 1Password on Dropbox so all has been great in terms of syncing. Now I had the task of installing my software I use on the new machine. I didn't want to copy over the preferences, I wanted a clean install. One application that I use is called CuteClips3; nice little clipboard manager app. But it's registration code is an image, not a serial number. Anyway, in the past I had added the image file to my CuteClips3 software item in 1Password. Today when I went to retrieve that image I get the following.
![]() Now, oddly enough, I went to my old machine and had no problems getting the data, thus I know it's good in the archive, but for some reason it wouldn't let me pull it out. First time this has happened to me. BTW, 1Password is one of those pieces of software I cannot live without, it's awesome and made my task tonight so much easier. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Quote:
How did you try to export the image? The easiest way is to just drag the file from 1Password to your Desktop. Though if it's an image you could just double click it and open it in the application that is set to open JPG images. I'm guessing you have to drag the image into the application to get it to register. So, I'd go the drag to Desktop, then drag to application option. This _should_ work, but if it isn't we'll need to get some more information and I'll have you PM and I'll send an email from our support site so I can monitor the discussion and help right away. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Quote:
I think I have realized what has happened. Since it was a new install, I pointed 1Password at the dropbox folder. BUT I didn't stop to think that maybe dropbox wasn't fully synced yet. I was able to get to the core of the files and thus why 1Password mostly worked, but when I tried to pull out something larger, it wouldn't work (dragging to desktop, export, anything resulted in the same error). I just retried, the machine was on all night for other things, and now it works fine. I'm guessing the dropbox sync was in progress before and now it's not. So chalk this one up as User Error, I was impatient. Last edited by CylonGlitch; Feb 20, 2013 at 09:47 AM. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Quote:
![]() Just so everyone else reading along can know some details. 1Password's data file is technically a "bundle" in OS X. It appears to be a file, but in reality it's a folder with a bunch of files in it. You can tell if something is a bundle by right clicking it and seeing "Show Package Contents" in Finder. This indicates a bundle. All applications are bundles in OS X. What this means is that as CylonGlitch pointed out if the sync with Dropbox isn't complete there may be files inside the bundle that aren't available yet Once the download completes with Dropbox it'll work as expected. In this case the error probably could've been more informative. We probably won't get this changed in version 3, but I've added it to my list of things to try to test in version 4 and see if we can improve the error messages more there. |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.












Linear Mode
