Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:29 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
UK Judge Who Chastised Apple Over Samsung 'Apology' Now Consulting as Patent Expert for Samsung




A UK judge who was involved in a case in which Apple was ordered to publish a notice on its website saying that Samsung's Galaxy Tab did not copy the registered design for the iPad has been hired by Samsung as a patent expert in a separate legal battle with Ericsson, reports software patent blog FOSS Patents.

Sir Robin Jacob served on a panel of appeals court judges reviewing the case after Apple complied with the initial court order but in a rather playful manner, quoting judge Colin Birss's earlier comment that the Galaxy Tab was "not as cool" as the iPad. Sir Robin was unamused, and ordered Apple to change the notice, accusing the company of acting with a "lack of integrity".

FOSS Patents' Florian Mueller discovered that Sir Robin is now acting as a patent expert for Samsung from a mention in a letter from Samsung's legal counsel concerning the ITC investigation of a patent infringement complaint filed by Ericsson against Samsung. The blog points out that there is nothing illegal in the maneuver and expresses no doubt that the judge has acted properly at all times, but notes that the impression given is not necessarily a favorable one.
Quote:
I ... have no doubt that at the time of the ruling Sir Robin Jacob was not being paid, or improperly promised to be paid, by Samsung, and he won't have had any contact with Samsung or Samsung's counsel that would have been against the rules and barred him from adjudicating the Samsung v. Apple case.

Furthermore, Sir Robin Jacob is truly an expert in patent law and there is no question that Samsung will benefit from his knowledge. That said, this just doesn't feel right. It gives the impression that a judge who deals Samsung's number one rival a huge PR blow, in a way that I found very extreme and unjustified, will be generously rewarded.
Mueller himself has found himself embroiled in a somewhat similar situation, having served as consultant to Oracle (as well as Microsoft) while also writing about the patent battle between Oracle and Google.

Article Link: UK Judge Who Chastised Apple Over Samsung 'Apology' Now Consulting as Patent Expert for Samsung
MacRumors is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:31 AM   #2
Mad Mac Maniac
macrumors 68040
 
Mad Mac Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A little bit of here and a little bit of there.
Smells fishy....

I always thought that ruling was rather childish...
__________________
Now I have a Signature!
Mad Mac Maniac is offline   46 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:32 AM   #3
Nicky G
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Baltimore & NYC
Hah, I wish I could say "unbelievable" but let's get real -- megacorps run the world.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" Retina 2.6GHz i7 Ivy Bridge 16GB 512GB
iPhone 5s 64GB Gold AT&T
iPad Air 128GB Space Gray AT&T
iPod nano 7th Generation Black
Nicky G is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:33 AM   #4
haruhiko
macrumors 68030
 
haruhiko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Let's buy a judge.
__________________
Mac: rMBP'12, iMac'08/24", Mini'09, MBP'10/15", MBA'11/13". iPhone: 5s/64S 5/64B, 4S/64W, 4/32B, 3GS/16. iPT: 3G,1G. iPad: Air,Mini2,4,3/LTE/64 2/3G/32, 1/WiFi/16. ATV'12,'11, AEBS'09, TC'13/2TB
haruhiko is offline   20 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:34 AM   #5
nsimpson94
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Inverness, Scotland
Stale iOS. Droids. Snappier. Etc.
nsimpson94 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:34 AM   #6
Picka
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
It's a conspiracy...

*Gets tinfoil hat*
Picka is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:34 AM   #7
mcarling
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Outrageous corruption! The judge should be disbarred.
mcarling is offline   53 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:35 AM   #8
turtlez
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Yeh, I wouldn't put it past Samsung to pay off people. After all without copying what would they be?
turtlez is offline   31 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:37 AM   #9
haruhiko
macrumors 68030
 
haruhiko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by turtlez View Post
Yeh, I wouldn't put it past Samsung to pay off people. After all without copying what would they be?
That's innovation! Apple didn't do that before!
__________________
Mac: rMBP'12, iMac'08/24", Mini'09, MBP'10/15", MBA'11/13". iPhone: 5s/64S 5/64B, 4S/64W, 4/32B, 3GS/16. iPT: 3G,1G. iPad: Air,Mini2,4,3/LTE/64 2/3G/32, 1/WiFi/16. ATV'12,'11, AEBS'09, TC'13/2TB
haruhiko is offline   33 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:38 AM   #10
eawmp1
macrumors 601
 
eawmp1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: FL
Better a former judge be a consultant than a former consultant be a judge.
eawmp1 is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:39 AM   #11
fatboyslick
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Other than implying foul play and sparking fanboy angst, why is this even published
fatboyslick is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:40 AM   #12
UnfetteredMind
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatboyslick View Post
Other than implying foul play and sparking fanboy angst, why is this even published
Page clicks of course!
UnfetteredMind is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:41 AM   #13
blackbirdz
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
So it's true that you can buy everything with money.
blackbirdz is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:41 AM   #14
needfx
macrumors 68020
 
needfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: macrumors apparently
active judge AND a consultant.

what a #$%^&*()
needfx is online now   13 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:41 AM   #15
craftytony
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sycamore, IL
Lol, WOW....I was wondering why this guy made Apple post an apology. Ridiculous....
craftytony is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:42 AM   #16
JGRE
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dutch Mountains
Money, money, money
__________________
iPhone 5s, 2008 iMac 20", 2011 MBP 13", ATV3, iPad Mini.
JGRE is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:44 AM   #17
haruhiko
macrumors 68030
 
haruhiko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatboyslick View Post
Other than implying foul play and sparking fanboy angst, why is this even published
Yes. Because we love to learn that even if the judge is hired by Samsung to be their consultant, he can act professionally and be as impartial as before in his profession as a judge. This is a role model for all of us. Even if I'm paid by one side I can still be impartial. Great.
__________________
Mac: rMBP'12, iMac'08/24", Mini'09, MBP'10/15", MBA'11/13". iPhone: 5s/64S 5/64B, 4S/64W, 4/32B, 3GS/16. iPT: 3G,1G. iPad: Air,Mini2,4,3/LTE/64 2/3G/32, 1/WiFi/16. ATV'12,'11, AEBS'09, TC'13/2TB
haruhiko is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:44 AM   #18
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Love all the tin foil hats people are wearing. This stuff happens all the time. And by this stuff - I don't mean what's being implied on this thread. I mean hiring EXPERTS as consultants.
samcraig is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:45 AM   #19
Tiger8
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2011
judges need love too!

judges need love too!
Tiger8 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:45 AM   #20
GermanyChris
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Here
This is great!

We the people thought we were in charge, now we really know where we stand.
GermanyChris is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:46 AM   #21
gnasher729
macrumors G5
 
gnasher729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatboyslick View Post
Other than implying foul play and sparking fanboy angst, why is this even published
"Implying foul play" is plenty of reason, isn't it?

Apple is probably free to put this onto their website. "On order of Judge soandso, who is now paid as a consultant for Samsung, we'd like to tell you that Samsung phones are the greatest phones. Believe it or not. "
gnasher729 is offline   22 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:46 AM   #22
iphone495
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
As a British, I would say "This is SCANDALOUS!"

Last edited by iphone495; Feb 28, 2013 at 03:29 PM.
iphone495 is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:46 AM   #23
uknowimright
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
great comedic responses so far guys, keep it up, work is kind of slow today and need the entertainment
uknowimright is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:47 AM   #24
GoldenJoe
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Seems pretty obvious to me.
GoldenJoe is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 08:47 AM   #25
SlugBlanket
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Mac Maniac View Post
Smells fishy....

I always thought that ruling was rather childish...
And Apple's "Playful compliance" wasn't ?

Apple took the piss and they got spanked. The Judge moved on and is being paid for his expertise. The writer of the blog is an idiot. They mention all the disclaimers about the Judge doing nothing improper at the time of the ruling and then chastise him for being able to earn money for his expertise.

Apple would be un-likely to hire him since he was one member of the panel that censured them for their shenanigans, however, if they had subsequently hired him for another matter, perhaps the blog writer would feel better about the world.

Whilst amusing that's as far as this story goes.

edit: In addition, the blog writer says that Apple "complied with the initial court order but in a rather playful manner". Well, they did not comply with the court order which is why they were censured in the first place. Also, no court in any jurisdiction likes their orders to be interpreted "in a rather playful manner". That lack of respect is bound to end only one way and frankly Apple were fortunate they were not dealt with more harsly or deemed to be in contempt.

Last edited by SlugBlanket; Feb 28, 2013 at 06:56 PM. Reason: misplaced my tin foil hat
SlugBlanket is online now   10 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jury Finds Both Apple and Samsung Guilty of Patent Infringement, Samsung to Pay $119.6 Million, Apple to Pay $158,400 MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 609 May 23, 2014 05:53 PM
Samsung Expert Says It Only Owes Apple $40 Million in Patent Case, Not $2 Billion MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 37 Apr 22, 2014 01:43 PM
Judge Declines to Sanction Samsung for Role in Apple-Nokia Patent License Leaks MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 17 Mar 5, 2014 06:16 AM
Judge Invalidates Two Samsung Patent Claims Ahead of Second Patent Lawsuit with Apple MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 60 Jan 23, 2014 01:31 PM
Appeals Court Rules Judge Must Reconsider Banning Samsung Devices for Apple Patent Violations MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 85 Nov 24, 2013 08:42 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC