I actually got a bag of peanuts recently, and on the bag, it read; "This product may contain peanuts". All I could think was, if it doesn't, I want my $2 back.
Someone earlier posted the statistics of food allergy deaths v asthma deaths, I wish more people would educate themselves like that. I have a friend, her son has a mild peanut allergy (he has to eat about a bag of peanuts to develop a hives-like rash). She will come to my house and make sure I have no peanut products in my house before she will bring him over.
The level of paranoid persecution-complex that peanut allergy people explode with, blows my mind. I love my friend to death, but she needs to take it down a couple dozen notches. And, I'm not saying food allergies can't be dangerous, believe it or not, there are people who die every year due to dehydration or dysentery cause by lactose intolerance. It just seems like the peanut people are the most vicious and vocal.
In the US some labels will say "may contain tree nuts" or "may contain peanuts" or both, depending on what the product is - like maybe a packet of sunflower seeds. That may make a little more sense than finding a package of peanuts that just says "may contain nuts."
As far as paranoia over the potential for an allergic reaction goes, I'd say walk in someone's shoes before caling it that. A mild reaction one time can set you up for severe anapylaxis the next time. Hence that other poster's remark about how they make you wait for half an hour after you get an allergy shot to make sure that just your treatment itself won't kill you! My own experience when I developed a reaction to amoxycillin was a gradual thing, a few times of wondering what was going on, followed by a severe reaction. . It's pretty common to have that happen with wasp or bee sting allergies as well. One or two, no big deal, next time better be near an ambulance Same thing when I reacted to one particcular brand of laundry detergent. That time I ended up having to take steroids for a couple days to chill it out.
So, "vicious and vocal" might be your perception of someone else's determination to protect her peanut-allergic kid from an escalating allergic experience that could kill him. I guess I wouldn't mind being called vicious or vocal if the alternative was a chance my kid's hosts were otherwise going to take the kid's allergy with a grain of salt.
Bottom line on allergies: statistics REALLY don't matter when it's your own body vetting how much exposure you personally can take before your cat dander allergy or your ingestion of beans or chicken closes up your throat. The same holds true for a parent's concerns over a child's allergies. And why not. All it takes is one overexposure and a failure to get the kid treatment in time and you're burying your child.
If you are not a parent then maybe you cannot empathize with the anxiety over peanuts and a peanut-allergic kid. Kids' friends don't always get the potential for a life-threatening experience, so best practice is to try to make your child's hosts aware, make sure the allergic kid is aware, have the epipen available to the school or a chaperoning parent at a sleepover, etc. So many chances for one of those safeguards not to kick in. Parenthood is pretty nerve-wracking anyway sometimes but allergic reaction possibilities certainly up the ante.
One peanut-allergic and poultry-allergic friend of mine no longer eats at restaurants, because an inquiry about what may or may not be in particular dishes has so often just fetched a guess (while that guess was being sworn to) by the waiter. Of course he carries an epipen but he just got tired of having to use it whie proving the answer to his question had been BS. So he joins us for dinners or lunches but drinks water w/ lemon and sometimes brings an apple or orange. I said once I felt bad for him. He said not to feel bad, that he was happy just still being able to join us. When I think about the dismissive attitude a lot of non-allergic people have towards allergies, I figure I'm damn lucky he's still with us at all.