That one was so tasteful, and was never even aired on TV. You can tell they just made it for fun to show off at the keynote.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Testing Keyboard Case for Potential Release Alongside iPad 5
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
That one was so tasteful, and was never even aired on TV. You can tell they just made it for fun to show off at the keynote.
Possibly correct. In the past couple years, Apple and Microsoft had quietly sat down and cross-licensed a crapload of things.
THIS is the primary reason why Apple has not gone PATENT-NUCLEAR against Microsoft. Because MS was smart enough to have licensed some things from Apple in the first place, therefore shielding Microsoft from further patent suits by Apple. This is the Apple-Microsoft Frenemy relationship at its best. They despise each other, and yet sometimes they need each other to get a leg up against common rivals. The MolotovRibbentrop Pact of the tech era.
Apple's future product set
To me it seems that Apple is about halfway to completely merging their OS with iOS. Meaning one platform across their mobile and desktop devices.
I can foresee a future where Mac and iPads merge into one device. Your iPad will be docked and become your 'Mac' on your desk and be undocked to become your iPad. All with one touchscreen iOS-like interface.
To me it seems that Apple is about halfway to completely merging their OS with iOS. Meaning one platform across their mobile and desktop devices.
I can foresee a future where Mac and iPads merge into one device. Your iPad will be docked and become your 'Mac' on your desk and be undocked to become your iPad. All with one touchscreen iOS-like interface.
Sadly, it probably will be only for the 5, if it gets released. They want you to get the tablet AND the keyboard case.
Last time I checked, the Surface products were not the first with detachable keyboards -- so they're not copying Microsoft so much. Microsoft just has the most marketing dollars behind their push, and is the most recent "new" thing with it.
If I recall correctly, right after the iPad came out, there were some third-party keyboard cases that started cropping up, long before the Surface was even a thing. I know there were a few models of those before the Surface came out, mostly made by Belkin, Logitech, et al.
If I'm mistaken on timing on that, then we should remember ASUS beat them both to the punch, since the Transformer Android line had the snap-in keyboards at their first release.
Apple usually takes an idea, improves it, and iterates on it until it's a great experience. That's not necessarily a bad thing, it's very hard (and rare) to come up with something perfect out of thin air, but iterating and improving something that already exists is much more feasible, and shouldn't be frowned upon.
If I recall correctly, right after the iPad came out, there were some third-party keyboard cases that started cropping up, long before the Surface was even a thing. I know there were a few models of those before the Surface came out, mostly made by Belkin, Logitech, et al.
If I'm mistaken on timing on that, then we should remember ASUS beat them both to the punch, since the Transformer Android line had the snap-in keyboards at their first release.
Apple usually takes an idea, improves it, and iterates on it until it's a great experience. That's not necessarily a bad thing, it's very hard (and rare) to come up with something perfect out of thin air, but iterating and improving something that already exists is much more feasible, and shouldn't be frowned upon.
I was surprised/irrated by the amount of people saying "omg it has a keyboard" when the Surface was introduced. Seems like their brains were on vacation or something when third parties like Zagg released keyboard covers for the iPad far before that.
So no, Mircosoft did NOT invent the keyboard cover, therefore Apple is NOT "clearly (lol) copying the Surface", but just working on a product type that has been introduced far before the Surface.
I'd take it a step further with "the my <favorite tech company> is better than yours" rhetoric is tiresome... I read it here from Mac/iOS nerds and I hear it at the office from Linux/Android nerds...
At the end of the day, it just a ****ing phone/tablet/computer and these companies don't need to be defended by a bunch of whiny nerds...
I cringe when I read forums (any forums!)... But yet I still read them... so it is my fault if I'm annoyed....
Exactly. You know, just like Samsung's smartwatch is a copy of Apple's never-released and maybe never developed iWatch, like Samsung's SmartTV is a copy of the non-existent iTV...
If this is real, there's a good possibility it won't since the 5 will have a different form factor.
Not everything has to be backwards compatible. If you want it, you buy the new one.
This would be good. The covers and the kickstand are the two things that Microsoft really got right with the Surface. It's a great concept, especially being extended now to include an extra battery capable of powering the tablet.
I don't expect Apple will go that route - I would expect bluetooth connection rather than a physical one, but speaking from extensive experience (I own a Surface Pro), there is still a lot of room to perfect the execution of these keyboards.
I don't expect Apple will go that route - I would expect bluetooth connection rather than a physical one, but speaking from extensive experience (I own a Surface Pro), there is still a lot of room to perfect the execution of these keyboards.
Apple has patents going back to 2011 on this. Maybe something will finally get released.
This first one is from early 2011 and covers a lot of different features;
http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...e-display-solar-panels-built-in-keyboard.html
![6a0120a5580826970c017616f5160a970c-pi]()
![6a0120a5580826970c017743db54c7970d-pi]()
And here are some others:
http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...w-more-features-for-the-ipad-smart-cover.html
![6a0120a5580826970c017ee9cd8963970d-pi]()
http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...t-cover-with-built-in-inductive-charging.html
![6a0120a5580826970c017ee94c942e970d-pi]()
If Apple can release an iPad cover with built in keyboard and Stylus storage with an Apple designed precision stylus it will be worth £100.
After that a proper iPhone wallet case will be great.
That's not my impression. I read a lot of people here saying MS got some things right with the Surface; a keyboard cover being one of those things.
Apple has a great track record of making well-integrated products where the majority of features work very well together. They seem to do this better than anyone else. Do you disagree?
It's not worth attempting these clarifications. Haters will Hate. Large numbers in MR. Mostly from Mid 2012 to current.
Apple has always played the follower. In fact, Apple was at its best when it simply let others innovate and then it improved and perfect others' innovations.
Actually you are wrong, and Microsoft had to license this from Apple.
Not your finest hour...
Not if you look at the patent that Apple submitted in 2011 - over a year before anything similar was announced from Microsoft:
http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...e-display-solar-panels-built-in-keyboard.html
It's just how this works in most cases. If Apple does something, it's done right. Microsoft takes the opposite approach (Windows 8 UI, Xbox One technical aspecs, Office on Mac, and the list can go on and on).
Microsoft and Apple are competitors, no doubt, but the fact that they are both (along with Microsoft partner Nokia) two of the most aggressive at IP-related lawsuits against Android OEMs but have entered into a cross-licensing agreement with each other make me think that they both realize that Android is a bigger threat to each of them than each other is. If Surface gains significant market share, it will be at the expense of Android.
As for the Surface keyboard, it is one thing that Microsoft got right. They licensed Apple's Smart Cover and improved upon it. Apple may well have licensed the Surface keyboard with the intent of improving upon it, or they may have had the underlying patents already.