I'm just waiting for Stanley Kubrick's estate to come after Apple and others for copying the monolith shape and color.So what if my S6 Edge bottom strikes a similar resemblance with the iPhone 6?
I'm just waiting for Stanley Kubrick's estate to come after Apple and others for copying the monolith shape and color.So what if my S6 Edge bottom strikes a similar resemblance with the iPhone 6?
I'm sure when +20inch wheel came out, people made the same type of comments.
Just because it seems simple doesn't mean it's not creative right?
You were looking at the media and bloggers. They don't need anything more than an iPad. Developers need something with a lot more muscle than a MBP.
http://www.sagernotebook.com/Gaming-Notebook-NP9752-S.html
All over the world, developers know the value of OSX - just pop into a good shop anywhere and you'll see rows of Macs. There's a reason Silicon Valley made the joke/observation when the crew was at Tech Crunch: "A banged up 15-inch MacBook Pro with ****** stickers on it? Everyone here has a beat up 15-inch MacBook Pro ..."
I was in SF [again] a few weeks ago, and we used a nice work site to pound away at a prototype all day, pretty big joint - about 85% Macs. Many of these folks weren't sitting around surfing the net, they were writing badass apps, coding in Obj-C, Node, Rails (a couple of slick startups we chatted up) - and in our case, writing C++ and doing VR design and development.
Speaking of Microsoft, a good friend of mine, author, MS VIP, is at MS Ignite doing a couple of technical talks, and uses a Mac (along with plenty of other notable people in the industry). It's the mix of a *NIX based machine with terrific hardware, a warranty and OEM support network, an availability of commercial software all mixed into a super flexible platform (VMs, cross platform dev, etc.)
Keep thinking you aren't. It's amusing.Unfortunately (for all Samsung fans), I'm not wrong. Unless you work for Samsung (and are upper management) you have no idea how good or bad they are doing. When the S5 was released they claimed that it was selling like hotcakes...and now we know what a dud that model was. All we really know is that they have struggled - to put it mildly - for more than a year.
I know they are, doesn't change the fact as much as you would like it tooSo you admit that you are doing the same, huh?
If you take your blinders off you will realise that Samsung sales have been decreasing dramatically for months. Feel free to try spin that in a positive way by writing a couple of words and adding rolleyes at the end.
Here, you can copy and paste one these to make things easier for you:
Apple Watch is a copy of Samsung's smartwatches, or simply another smartwatch? There's a fairly big distinction between the two.I think that this is rather Samsungs response to Apple copying THEIR smartwatch!
Samsung had Smartwatches YEARS before Apple did.
Nobody complained when Apple copied THEM.
Apple Watch is a copy of Samsung's smartwatches, or simply another smartwatch? There's a fairly big distinction between the two.
The main keyword and point in all of it is "copy". When something is essentially a copy of something it's one thing, when something is simply another instance of something it's another thing (and not a copy). Again, a rather big distinction there.That doesn´t matter that there have been OTHER smartwatches before the Apple watch.
Samsung was simply the "biggest" competitor(with biggest market share).
Same with iPhone - there were OTHER smartphones before APPLE EVEN MADE iPHONE, Image
But again, iPhone was just biggest name, and so that is what Samsung "copied" OVER THE YEARS. (even though in the picture it is shown, that Samsung actually came out with a smartphone before apple did...)
_________
Second point: Don´t you think that a company that MADE PHONES FOR YEARS wouldn´t MAKE TOUCHSCREEN PHONES, even if iPhone hadn´t appeared?
They simply observed the TREND, as did hundreds of other companies, including Google,Motorola,HTC and so on...
The main keyword and point in all of it is "copy". When something is essentially a copy of something it's one thing, when something is simply another instance of something it's another thing (and not a copy). Again, a rather big distinction there.
And?
And?
And? Clearly you can not even comprehend what it is trying to say.
With that being said, don´t bother responding - I won´t reply.