That hasn't stopped many a fixed boxing match. I don't care either way. I'm just saying that's a weak argument.
I agree with you. The poster you are referring to, even though they have similar experience to me (in some respects), is just talking on emotion. He may even be Japanese like me so I suspect the martial arts are not sport, but a way of life, even a religion. (ie - Shinto).
When there's a huge economic incentive to lose, then weird things can happen. I should have said that only
some fights are staged or predetermined "if" there's a lot of money involved.
I apologize for my reality TV b.s. thread title and I will change it for respect of real MMA practitioners and fans. ...also...Macdawg, I will PM you as to this and also apologize in advance.
One of the most revered sports from my Japanese heritage is Sumo wrestling. On its face, with its long tradition and tie win with Shintoism, one would think that there's no way that Sumo could ever be fixed at some matches,
right?
Anyway, some mathematicians in Japan have put out some intriguing evidence and some journalists published articles that this most revered of fighting sports can, on occasion, like a boxing match or UFC, be fixed. Did Ali lose to be able to regain third reign at top? Did some let Kimbo win to raise his and the sport's visibility. Honestly, before Kimbo, I never ever heard anybody outside of MMA mention a name of any competitor. But Kimbo is fairly well known in a lot of places today, but still somewhat less than the Hulkster.
I could go into another argument bringing Sumo into the thread, but that's not what I will do since, if anybody loves any sort of match (especially Sumo which is huge and actually holds a national identity much like baseball does in the USA), please see the movie,
"Freakonmics"*.
While my family holds Japanese traditions in high esteem, and I hold Okinawan Karate at a high level of prestige, there is no way I would have thought there could be anything fixed about Sumo. While it looks like two fat guys just pushing each other around in a circle, it's very brutal and loaded with injuries. These guys train very hard and are experts at what they do. So f--- UFC or boxing or WWF when we talk about what some say is 2,000 year old sport (and in current form hundreds of years old), and this is Sumo we are talking about and its older and as far as any cultural anthropologist is concerned, much more than a sport. Anybody who knows anything about the spiritual side of martial arts will understand though there's no requirement that one incorporate spirituality into Asian martial arts to benefit from it. (That in itself could be another thread, too
)
So when I saw freakonomics tonight,
the movie, my initial reaction when Japan's Sumo was attacked so blatantly, I was offended. But more than being Japanese, I am educated, especially in mathematics and statistics so I sat through and heard the arguments as to why Sumo can be faked, or have staged outcomes, at times and how that ties in with human nature (ie. greed).
However, after seeing the Japanese investigative reporters/researchers and a couple of Americans who backed their claim of some corruption in what some see as the purist of sports on its face, the evidence of "some" cheating in Sumo is very profound and very hard to refute mathematically.
Unlike UFC or American boxing, pissing on the image of the sports won't get you killed, but in Japan, it can if one challenges Sumo, and that's just how much some people in high places (actually all places there) can revere the sport.
But sometimes the best way to hide impropriety is to have an heir of absolute purity and tradition. At the end of the day, financial incentives can get to the top Sumo guys, too. Hey, they're human and when it comes to Japanese culture, believe me, they have their Don Kings, too.
Anyway, it's too long to go into the math here (I did grad work in quantitative analysis and macroeconomics), but please rent the movie. It may not change your worldview, or anybody's on cheating in matches, or other topics brought up such as abortion, raising children, or shaky real estate deals, but a sound use of mathematics is not a bad thing when it's devoid of emotion and allowed to paint a picture without left or right wing pundits pushing an agenda.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freakonomics
*flamesuit disclaimer: I am a liberal and I know the recent ultra-right wing worship for the authors of Freakonomics, but let's let political debate on authors Dubner and Leavitt as neo-con idols sprout in another forum and not this thread.