Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 1, 2012, 06:38 AM   #1
jbg232
macrumors 65816
 
jbg232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real World Users: Which has faster importing/previewing: LR4 or Aperture 3?

I've been using Aperture 3 for a long time and now have about 50K images. Just upgraded to a 5D Mark III and that combined with my 4 year old computer are really causing me a LOT of headaches with waiting for importing/indexing/etc. I'm going to be get a new computer in a few months and want to know from REAL users whether LR4 is actually faster than Aperture 3 for initial image importing/indexing/rating/etc.

When I started with Aperture 2, I compared LR to it and Aperture was noticeably faster. I don't have the computer resources right now to load my entire library onto LR4 to get a real world preview of it and want to know from serious photographers, WHO HAVE REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE, which is faster for batch importing/initial rating/previewing.

Aside from this I have no other problems with Aperture 3 so please don't recommend LR4 over aperture for other features.
__________________
iMac | MacBook | iPad | iPhone | Apple TV
5D Mark III | 24-105L | 100-400L | 50 f/1.4 | 50 f/2.8 Macro
jbg232 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2012, 08:23 AM   #2
maflynn
Moderator
 
maflynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston
TBH, I really don't see a major difference between the two. I think in my case LR is a bit slower because I convert my RAW files to DNG which is an added step.

When doing strictly RAW imports w/o any DNG conversion I really didn't see any difference between the two.
__________________
~Mike Flynn
maflynn is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2012, 10:41 AM   #3
snberk103
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: An Island in the Salish Sea
I can't answer the question directly... but....

Once you get your new computer you should find that the time to import photos with either package is pretty short, regardless. I spend way more time on the other tasks and the import time wasn't even a consideration. For me, the deciding factor was the noise reduction in Lr3 (now upgraded to Lr4). I couldn't even tell you how long it takes to import... it just is what it is....

YMMV, of course... but I just throw that out there.
__________________
My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world. - Jack Layton
snberk103 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Importing Pictures into Aperture from Multiple iPhones bermane iPhone Tips, Help and Troubleshooting 3 Oct 21, 2013 01:12 AM
Aperture 3 vs LR4 Performance on 2008 MacBook gryffinwings Digital Photography 3 Apr 8, 2013 12:57 AM
For faster Aperture >Faster CPU or SDD? blanket86 MacBook Pro 1 Nov 25, 2012 11:20 AM
ACR faster than Aperture G.T. Digital Photography 5 Oct 12, 2012 08:21 AM
Does Aperture 3.3 feel faster to anyone else? zorinlynx Mac Applications and Mac App Store 7 Jun 17, 2012 09:53 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC