Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 4, 2012, 08:15 PM   #1
Sonicjay
macrumors 6502a
 
Sonicjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
My 6G Nano running setup (watch band, bluetooth, Nike)

I've been wanting to get a 6G Nano for a while now (despite having an iPhone 4S), particularly since seeing the different watch bands out there. I thought it would be really cool for the gym to replace my old blue shuffle that got run through the wash. I was also tired of headphone cables bouncing around and catching on stuff. I did some research before buying, and came up with a combo that is working awesome for me, so I thought I'd share.

* Nano 6G (obviously)
* iWatchz Q/Q2 series band (black silicone)
* Kokkia i10s bluetooth transmitter in black
* Motorola SD10HD bluetooth headphones

This combo works fantastic, and I totally love it! I use RunKeeper on my iPhone to track my runs (I have a buddy who also uses it), and use the Nano for music; I just started trying the Nike+ on the Nano, and found that it wasn't too far off for not having GPS or anything. I calibrated it tonight after my run based on the info from RunKeeper and will try it again tomorrow to see if it's right on.

Hardware notes:

* iWatchz band, $25 - Super light, very comfortable, and rock solid. There's no way the Nano is coming off of there on accident. There's a tab on the belt clip that locks into a slot on the band housing, which snaps in with a solid click.

* Kokkia bluetooth adapter, $49 - this thing is tiny; smaller than it even looked in the pics, and you can't even tell it's there.

* Motorola SD10HD bluetooth headphones, $89.99 - I had purchased Sony Ericsson HBH-IS800 Bluetooth earbuds first, but they wouldn't fit my ears, and wouldn't stay in, so I returned them and bought these. The SD10 headset is a million times better; it has a fairly tight grip that "clamps" around your head and over the top of the ears. It isn't going anywhere without being pulled off. There are controls on the sides of them, but I don't use them really.

Now, I could just pair the headset with my iPhone, but I really like having the Nano on my wrist to be able to double-click the sleep/wake button and skip songs, even with warm gloves on in the dark. For those wondering if you need anything else to use Nike+ with the Nano, you don't. Just the Nano. I'll see tomorrow if the calibration made it dead on, but it was pretty close already.

I got the Kokkia bluetooth adapter from Amazon.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1-nano-tab-clip.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	34.6 KB
ID:	318586   Click image for larger version

Name:	2-nano-on-band.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	84.3 KB
ID:	318587   Click image for larger version

Name:	3-bt-and-headset.JPG
Views:	80
Size:	85.4 KB
ID:	318588  

Click image for larger version

Name:	4-nano-w-bt.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	107.2 KB
ID:	318589   Click image for larger version

Name:	5-nano-calibration.jpg
Views:	360
Size:	98.3 KB
ID:	318590  
Sonicjay is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2012, 08:28 PM   #2
Lurchdubious
macrumors 65816
 
Lurchdubious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Gem State
Send a message via AIM to Lurchdubious
Nice setup!
__________________
iPhone 5S 32GB
16GB iPad Air
13" MB Air 1.7GHz i5
13" 2.4 Ghz Unibody MB, ATV2: Assorted iPods
Lurchdubious is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2012, 07:03 AM   #3
Sonicjay
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Sonicjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurchdubious View Post
Nice setup!
Thanks
Sonicjay is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2012, 10:42 PM   #4
Sonicjay
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Sonicjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Well, I went running again tonight after doing the calibration last night, and it was definitely closer, though it was still a little off due to my pace being slightly quicker tonight (GPS measured on my iPhone). So, it's obviously not as good as having a true GPS tracker, it does a decent job, and if you use a treadmill on consistent settings, it would probably do fairly well (whereas a GPS tracker would be useless, since you're not moving).
Sonicjay is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2012, 01:08 AM   #5
AndrewR23
macrumors 68020
 
AndrewR23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Whats the difference between the iWatchz Q and Q2. The Q is at Apple for 25$ but the Q2 is 40$

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonicjay View Post
Well, I went running again tonight after doing the calibration last night, and it was definitely closer, though it was still a little off due to my pace being slightly quicker tonight (GPS measured on my iPhone). So, it's obviously not as good as having a true GPS tracker, it does a decent job, and if you use a treadmill on consistent settings, it would probably do fairly well (whereas a GPS tracker would be useless, since you're not moving).
AndrewR23 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2012, 05:55 AM   #6
Sonicjay
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Sonicjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewR23 View Post
Whats the difference between the iWatchz Q and Q2. The Q is at Apple for 25$ but the Q2 is 40$
From their site:

"Featuring the same soft-touch silicone bands as the Q collection, the Q2 adds a level of style and durability by replacing the Q's polycarbonate clips with beautiful matte silver anodized aluminum clips."
Sonicjay is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2012, 05:49 PM   #7
AndrewR23
macrumors 68020
 
AndrewR23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
which one do you have?

Last edited by AndrewR23; Jan 6, 2012 at 06:03 PM.
AndrewR23 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 7, 2012, 08:28 AM   #8
Sonicjay
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Sonicjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewR23 View Post
which one do you have?
The regular Q.
Sonicjay is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 06:36 PM   #9
plkl
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Thanks for the info. How was the accuracy on your recent runs?
plkl is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 06:43 PM   #10
Sonicjay
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Sonicjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by plkl View Post
Thanks for the info. How was the accuracy on your recent runs?
It definitely improved, but two days later, I went running with a buddy at a faster pace so it was off again. If your pace stays the same, it's fairly accurate, considering it has no GPS, and is more or less a pedometer.
Sonicjay is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Review: LunaTik Chicago Black iPod Nano Watch Band & AnTik Watch Face agallowa iPod 3 Aug 9, 2012 01:01 PM
Bluetooth Nano Watch -- Kickstarter Schmoyer iPod 16 Jul 10, 2012 01:42 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC