Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 9, 2012, 03:48 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iPhone 4S Closes Sales Gap on Android as Apple Sweeps Top Three Smartphone Models




TechCrunch writes of the latest report from NPD, covering U.S. smartphone sales in October and November of last year. The data, which begins right about when the iPhone 4S was released, shows a dramatic increase in market share for the iPhone. The jump, from 26% in Q3 2011 to 43% in October and November, is due in-part to pent-up demand for the next iPhone following the pushback of the "iPhone 5" from the traditional June release cycle. As a result, iPhone share is unlikely to remain quite so high going forward, but the gain is nonetheless impressive.




Perhaps even more striking is that the top three phone models are all iPhones. Unsurprisingly, the iPhone 4S is the most popular, followed by the now-$99 iPhone 4. The iPhone 3GS, free on AT&T with a two-year contract in its third year of availability, comes in third, ahead of the Samsung Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II -- both Android phones introduced in 2011.




Samsung, like Apple, makes three of the top ten most popular models; HTC holds two spots, whilst Motorola and LG each round out the remaining models with one model each.

Article Link: iPhone 4S Closes Sales Gap on Android as Apple Sweeps Top Three Smartphone Models
MacRumors is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 03:50 PM   #2
Feed Me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Location Location
Pretty cool to see the 3GS still kicking arse.
Feed Me is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 03:58 PM   #3
nick_elt
macrumors 68000
 
nick_elt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

It says alot when a 3 year old iphone sells more than "the best" android.
Boom!
__________________
White Macbook, 2012 Macbook air 13", titanium grey galaxy note 2, ipad 3rd gen, apple tv 3
nick_elt is offline   27 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:00 PM   #4
Mochi Hana
macrumors 6502a
 
Mochi Hana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Hm, I've never heard of the LG Revere. o_o;
__________________
13" Macbook Air iPod classic 120 GB iPhone 5S 32 GB Moto X
Mochi Hana is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:02 PM   #5
gpat
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Italy
FYI, the world does not start nor end with America.
__________________
13" MBA 2013, Nexus 7 2013, LG G2 (oh noes i automatically become an apple hater)
(Sorry for bad english, not my mother tongue!)
gpat is offline   -8 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:07 PM   #6
vitzr
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: California
This is great news for those of us who are shareholders.
vitzr is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:15 PM   #7
nick_elt
macrumors 68000
 
nick_elt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpat
FYI, the world does not start nor end with America.
Im not american but by the way rumours is spelt. Im sure this is an american website
__________________
White Macbook, 2012 Macbook air 13", titanium grey galaxy note 2, ipad 3rd gen, apple tv 3
nick_elt is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:17 PM   #8
FakeWozniak
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Looks like Apple ate Androids lunch this last quarter.

This goes to show that the market share levitates around Apples annual release cycle. Apple being the 800lb gorilla, will famine a little before the release and feast just after it... And so will Android, but in reverse.
FakeWozniak is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:26 PM   #9
eNcrypTioN
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Apple ftw!!
eNcrypTioN is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:34 PM   #10
*LTD*
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post

Perhaps even more striking is that the top three phone models are all iPhones.
No it isn't. This is how it's been for a while now. Apple is usually in top spot, and the 3GS has been outselling most newer Android devices.

Apple's Quality vs. the competition's Quantity.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by vitzr View Post
This is great news for those of us who are shareholders.
It's great news for everyone. It means that iPhone users are part of a robust ecosystem that is healthy and will last. It's good news for our investment - as users - in the platform.

Last edited by *LTD*; Jan 9, 2012 at 05:17 PM.
*LTD* is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:47 PM   #11
kdarling
macrumors Demi-God
 
kdarling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Device engineer 30+ yrs, touchscreens 23+.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick_elt View Post
It says alot when a 3 year old iphone sells more than "the best" android. Boom!
Yes, among other things it says that 99 cents is a very attractive price for an iPhone (especially versus $100 to $230 for all the others in the top nine slots).
kdarling is offline   -3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 04:55 PM   #12
Rocketman
macrumors 603
 
Rocketman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Claremont, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squashy View Post
Pretty cool to see the 3GS still kicking arse.
I find it amazing that they, a) still make it and, b) sell a whole bunch of them.

It goes to show people really do care ore about basic functionality than specs. Because for $200 more on contract one could get a 4S with all its spec and feature bumps, yet some do not!

Rocketman

Minor nit. At this point I am thinking the marginal cost of the next iPhone 4 is not very much more if at all than an iPhone 3GS. This is a marketing not a manufacturing function!
__________________
Think Different-ly!
All R House jobs bills die in D Senate. Buy a model rocket here: http://v-serv.com/usr/instaship-visual.htm Thanks.
Rocketman is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 05:05 PM   #13
ArtOfWarfare
macrumors 603
 
ArtOfWarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to ArtOfWarfare
I wonder how things would have turned out for Samsung if they'd gone with Apple's approach and released one phone instead of two.

By releasing two phones at the same time Samsung did two things to harm themselves.
1 - They splintered their sales. People looking for non-iPhones now have twice as many models to choose from. The two models will fight with each other for market share.
2 - They display a lack of confidence in their own products. Essentially they're saying "Hey, we know neither one of these are perfect, so we'll let you choose which one you think is better." Apple, on the other hand, displays extreme confidence in their product by saying, "Here it is. This is the best phone on the planet. We tested dozens of other designs, and this one is the perfect one."

There are the pros to releasing multiple models, but those are more obvious.
__________________
Battery Status - On the Mac App Store
The only app that'll estimate when your wireless devices will need their batteries changed.
Including the ones paired with other Macs on your network.
ArtOfWarfare is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 05:20 PM   #14
jzuena
macrumors 6502a
 
jzuena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Burlington, MA, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdarling View Post
Yes, among other things it says that 99 cents is a very attractive price for an iPhone (especially versus $100 to $230 for all the others in the top nine slots).
Except that 99 dollars is an even more attractive price for an iPhone... and $199-$299 is even more attractive than that. Apple seems to be the only manufacturer that can outsell a 99 cent iPhone with more expensive models.
__________________
Pilot, greyhound walker, retired bartender extraordinaire.
jzuena is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 05:29 PM   #15
h0mi
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
This should demonstrate that Apple's "weakness" over the past year or 2 as Android captured bigger market share was availability on carriers.
h0mi is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 05:50 PM   #16
kdarling
macrumors Demi-God
 
kdarling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Device engineer 30+ yrs, touchscreens 23+.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtOfWarfare View Post
By releasing two phones at the same time Samsung did two things to harm themselves.
1 - They splintered their sales. People looking for non-iPhones now have twice as many models to choose from. The two models will fight with each other for market share.
It's all still revenue to the same company. The main difference is that individual devices won't score as high on popularity charts like the one in this thread.

Quote:
2 - They display a lack of confidence in their own products. Essentially they're saying "Hey, we know neither one of these are perfect, so we'll let you choose which one you think is better."
And Apple currently sells three models. It's not about lack of confidence; it's about hitting multiple market tiers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jzuena View Post
Apple seems to be the only manufacturer that can outsell a 99 cent iPhone with more expensive models.
All the $100 to $230 Android phones on that list outsold the 99 cent ones... which didn't even make the list. Apparently "free" Android phones don't account for the most popular sales.
kdarling is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 06:01 PM   #17
yeah
macrumors 6502a
 
yeah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Wow. This is GREAT for consumers! Especially since now 54% of people in the U.S. are now considering to buy an iPhone!
__________________
Steve Jobs (1955-2011).
yeah is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 07:38 PM   #18
ArtOfWarfare
macrumors 603
 
ArtOfWarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to ArtOfWarfare
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdarling View Post
And Apple currently sells three models. It's not about lack of confidence; it's about hitting multiple market tiers.
Yes, but when did Apple begin selling each model? They released each model in a different year, whereas Samsung released several models in 2011 alone. Apple was capable of claiming that they're released the best phone ever each time, whereas Samsung couldn't. For Samsung to say one of their phones was the best ever would imply that the other ones that they were releasing in the same year weren't as good as Samsung was capable of making them, that Samsung had cut corners.
__________________
Battery Status - On the Mac App Store
The only app that'll estimate when your wireless devices will need their batteries changed.
Including the ones paired with other Macs on your network.
ArtOfWarfare is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 07:51 PM   #19
george-brooks
macrumors 6502a
 
george-brooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New York, NY
Wow, this is very impressive data! It seems Apple finally finally got it right, offering a fantastic phone for free, an even better phone for a low price, and an incredible phone at an affordable price. The numbers will probably level off a bit over the course of the product cycle, but imagine what these numbers will look like when the rest of the hold-outs switch when the iPhone 5 comes out!

Also love to see how deep a plunge Android took! Because you KNOW that thats where most of the new iOS users are coming from!

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by jzuena View Post
Except that 99 dollars is an even more attractive price for an iPhone... and $199-$299 is even more attractive than that. Apple seems to be the only manufacturer that can outsell a 99 cent iPhone with more expensive models.
YES!!! I love that Apple can say "Here, we'll give you this one for free!! or... or... you can pay us $200 and we'll give you this one that looks a lot prettier and runs a little faster" and most of time, you'll fork over the $200. Thumbs up for improving upon your own designs!
__________________
Mac Pro 6,1: 6 Core 3.5 GHz|32GB|D700|1TB
MacBook Pro 8,2: 2.5 GHz i7|16GB|750GB+240GB SSD
iPhone 5s, iPad 4, iPad Mini Retina, 12" Powerbook G4

Last edited by george-brooks; Jan 9, 2012 at 07:47 PM. Reason: added
george-brooks is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 08:34 PM   #20
AustinIllini
macrumors Demi-God
 
AustinIllini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtOfWarfare View Post
Yes, but when did Apple begin selling each model? They released each model in a different year, whereas Samsung released several models in 2011 alone. Apple was capable of claiming that they're released the best phone ever each time, whereas Samsung couldn't. For Samsung to say one of their phones was the best ever would imply that the other ones that they were releasing in the same year weren't as good as Samsung was capable of making them, that Samsung had cut corners.
A friend and I were discussing Motorola's similar strategy. I don't understand why the company continues to cannibalize its new products with newer ones a month later. Why not ride out one phone for a while.
__________________
Victory ILLINOIS Varsity!
Early 2011 13" MBP iPad Mini Retina 32 GB Google Nexus 5
AustinIllini is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 08:36 PM   #21
*LTD*
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinIllini View Post
A friend and I were discussing Motorola's similar strategy. I don't understand why the company continues to cannibalize its new products with newer ones a month later. Why not ride out one phone for a while.
No confidence. They don't believe in their own products.
*LTD* is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 09:08 PM   #22
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by *LTD* View Post
No confidence. They don't believe in their own products.
That's your opinion. It's not fact. Let's be clear. Different business models is the reality. But keep dreaming your dream LOL
samcraig is offline   -9 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 09:08 PM   #23
BC2009
macrumors 68000
 
BC2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpat View Post
FYI, the world does not start nor end with America.
However, the USA is the one of the few countries where the iPhone 4S was first available. By the same note the Galaxy Nexus has only been available on subsidized contract in the USA since December if I am not mistaken. iPhone has been the leading selling smartphone worldwide for years though (even with the old model out-selling competitors). The OS market share numbers are interesting, but another look at this in 3 months after the dust settles will help in determining trends. I for one do not subscribe to the Droid Army belief that Android is on its way to 90% market share with Apple fading into irrelevance. The user satisfaction numbers on Android phones represent a huge opportunity for Apple.
BC2009 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 09:23 PM   #24
danahn17
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtOfWarfare View Post
Yes, but when did Apple begin selling each model? They released each model in a different year, whereas Samsung released several models in 2011 alone. Apple was capable of claiming that they're released the best phone ever each time, whereas Samsung couldn't. For Samsung to say one of their phones was the best ever would imply that the other ones that they were releasing in the same year weren't as good as Samsung was capable of making them, that Samsung had cut corners.
Sorry but I don't buy that argument. Look how many models of Ferraris there are. Does that suggest a lack of confidence in their cars?

Or closer home...how many models of iMacs, MBPs, and iPods are there? Does that suggest Apple lacks confidence in their other products?

Apple and the various Android makers have just different business models and each method has their own pros and cons. Just leave it at that... there's nothing more to it.
danahn17 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2012, 09:25 PM   #25
Gasu E.
macrumors 68020
 
Gasu E.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpat View Post
FYI, the world does not start nor end with America.
Actually, the world (of technology gizmos) does indeed start with America.
__________________
Please stop boring me.
Gasu E. is offline   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Again Trails Market in Smartphone Growth, but Closes on Nokia in Overall Mobile Phones MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 188 May 3, 2014 07:53 PM
Apple Reportedly Retakes U.S. Smartphone Sales Lead from Android on iPhone 5 Strength MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 268 Dec 24, 2012 03:46 AM
iPhone Accounts for 77% of Smartphone Sales, 62% of All Postpaid Phone Sales at AT&T in 3Q 2012 MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 69 Oct 25, 2012 02:57 PM
iPhone Represents 73% of Smartphone Sales, 55% of All Postpaid Phone Sales at AT&T in 2Q 2012 MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 66 Jul 25, 2012 02:16 PM
Reason to get iPhone over Android: Apple awarded the mother of all smartphone patents Big.Mac.Daddy iPhone 111 Jul 21, 2012 01:20 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC