Serious question. We've all seen mockups of devices with screens that go from edge to edge with no bezel whatsoever. Can this be done in the real world?
You'd accidentally press the screen all the time. Need a bezel even if it's small.
Not necessarily - a smaller bezel (which would also qualify as an edge-to-edge display), would be sufficient.You'd accidentally press the screen all the time. Need a bezel even if it's small.
Not necessarily - a smaller bezel (which would also qualify as an edge-to-edge display), would be sufficient.
It will simply cost more to create an edge-to-edge display and produce it without any flaws.
Not necessarily - a smaller bezel (which would also qualify as an edge-to-edge display), would be sufficient.
It will simply cost more to create an edge-to-edge display and produce it without any flaws.
I don't know about you, but when I hold my phone the skin in my thumb area slightly spills onto the side bezel. With an edge to edge display, this would register a touch.
My hands aren't fat before you ask
I am sure there can be ways around this. Perhaps not registering touch initiated from the edges of the display, as one example I can think of.
Probably. Anything would need extensive testing before being released though and the pros and cons would have to be weighed up. Some apps use gestures initiated from the edge of the screen, for example. The notification bar is one such example. I know that's from the top, but it's one such example.
You'd accidentally press the screen all the time. Need a bezel even if it's small.
Jobs: "You're holding it wrong"
How would it not get in the way visually?But this excuse was already used when they had antenna issues. Maybe they will give us an "anti-touch" bumper to compensate?
It is in some way subjective. Displays without bezels simply do not exist yet (because, for example, you need space for the LEDs, or for the structure, or delineation)."Qualify"?? Either a screen reaches the edge of a phone or it doesn't. This is not a subjective question.
And why would it cost more? A bit more R&D perhaps. They are doing R&D all the time, anyway.
I understand what you mean, but the bezel could be thinner and still no touch would be registered.I don't know about you, but when I hold my phone the skin in my thumb area slightly spills onto the side bezel. With an edge to edge display, this would register a touch.
My hands aren't fat before you ask
Ok, that's all possible of course, but how do you know if nobody has made one?It is in some way subjective. Displays without bezels simply do not exist yet (because, for example, you need space for the LEDs, or for the structure, or delineation).
And yes, it would cost more. A display without almost no bezel (as I said, there must be some sort of a bezel) costs more to produce (it's more difficult and it causes more production defects). The component cost also will be higher.
"Qualify"?? Either a screen reaches the edge of a phone or it doesn't. This is not a subjective question.
And why would it cost more? A bit more R&D perhaps. They are doing R&D all the time, anyway.