Just upgrade my 2009 dual 2.26 to dual 2.93 GHz

[Amethyst]

I've just upgrade my old 8-core 2.26 GHz Mac Pro to use a new pair of x5570.
Thats means now i've own a mac that once time its cost 5,899 USD!!!!!

Form my experience i want to share 5 things.

1.) I've using 2.1 mm of washer (0.7mm x 3), and it work great!! you just tighten the screw and it set, no fan problem ho heat problem. (Idle 44c under Ambient 39c very hot in Thailand)
2.) I doesn't adjust, modify fan connector just use it as it come.
3.) I've add 2mm thermal pad to my heatsink, Add from pink thermal pad.
4.) It's very very easy. Doesn't need to hesitate.
5.) About the processor.
- I choose x5570 over 6-core variant because it much cheaper.I've paid just $380 for two of these. (vs $400 for just one of 6-core 2.4GHz that much lower frequency)
- I choose x5570 over w5590. Because it TDP is 95watt, follow Apple specification, I know w5590 can use without problem in 2009 pro. but my home is very very hot so i think i need lower TDP than +0.3 GHz max frequency.
- Another thing is about my dream, in 2009 I've dream to own the most expensive mac money can buy (8x2.93 Nehalem). That time i can't do. Today it very affordable to do.Why not?

[spoonie1972]

congrats! geekbench before and after on your particular system?

[Amethyst]

Originally Posted by spoonie1972

congrats! geekbench before and after on your particular system?

Before (2xE5520) = 13429
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1225318

After (2xX5570) = 18069
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1515217

My Collection FYI
Custom 2009 Mac Pro (6-core 3.2 GHz) = 14864
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/934285

2009 Mac Pro (Quad 2.66GHz) = 9555
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/699714

Custom 2006 Mac Pro (8x1.83GHz(BSEL2.33GHz)) = 9154
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/614672

2996 Mac Pro (2xDual 2.66GHz) = 5535
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/569046

[spoonie1972]

wow, seems like a very inexpensive way to bump up the performance (i also have a 2.26x8 right now).

[GXPvince]

Custom 2009 Mac Pro (6-core 3.2 GHz) = 14864
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/934285

How much was the processor for that machine? What model before did you have?

[Amethyst]

Originally Posted by GXPvince

Custom 2009 Mac Pro (6-core 3.2 GHz) = 14864
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/934285

How much was the processor for that machine? What model before did you have?

i've pay $300 for i7-970. bargain price.

I have two of 2009 pro. The first is single processor. original its 2.66 quad. but later upgrade with 6core 3.2 GHz.

The second is dual processor model in this threads.

[GXPvince]

If I could ask, what do you do with those machines?

[Amethyst]

dual processor - build an Apps for iOS, Software development, design retina-class website, web development, Do my Phd research. etc.
single processor - A server for my family business. (3-stars Hotel in Thailand) mainly use about hotel billing. collaboration service. In this picture it under my desk but now it moved to server room.

[shelant]

Where did you get 2 processors for $380?
It's a great a price. So, if the ambient temps in my house are not to high, would you suggest me to go the w5590 route. I do a lot of Adobe Lightroom and video encoding (handbrake), so the extra 0.3 would really help me.
Although, I understand the power consumption problem. Do you think, if I wanted to instal a powerful video card (ATI 5870 for example) in addition to upgrading to 2x3.20 (w5590), would I have problems with not enough power? Just FYI, I also have 6 HDDs inside my Mac Pro 2009 dual 2.26.
Thank you for your help.

[minifridge1138]

Originally Posted by shelant

Where did you get 2 processors for $380?

That's what I want to know.

[Amethyst]

ebay guys. $175 per processor, $30 shipping to Thailand.

----------

Originally Posted by shelant

Where did you get 2 processors for $380?
It's a great a price. So, if the ambient temps in my house are not to high, would you suggest me to go the w5590 route. I do a lot of Adobe Lightroom and video encoding (handbrake), so the extra 0.3 would really help me.
Although, I understand the power consumption problem. Do you think, if I wanted to instal a powerful video card (ATI 5870 for example) in addition to upgrading to 2x3.20 (w5590), would I have problems with not enough power? Just FYI, I also have 6 HDDs inside my Mac Pro 2009 dual 2.26.
Thank you for your help.

I still recommend X5570 over W5590. cause do something under spec is better.
but if extra 0.3 really help you you can go that route. PSU of our mac pro can do just fine.

[666sheep]

Originally Posted by shelant

snip

(w5590)

snip

You need X5590 not W5590. "W" are for single CPU setup only.

[Amethyst]

Originally Posted by 666sheep

You need X5590 not W5590. "W" are for single CPU setup only.

W5590 is right.

Single setup is xeon 3000 series.
Dual setup is xeon 5000 series.

W prefix is tell processor have 130w TDP.
X prefix is tell processor have 95w TDP.

There're 2 of W prefix processor in 5000 series.
W5580 at 3.2 GHz turbo boost 3.43 GHz
W5590 at 3.3 GHz turbo boost 3.6 GHz

[666sheep]

Originally Posted by Amethyst

W5590 is right.

Single setup is xeon 3000 series.
Dual setup is xeon 5000 series.

W prefix is tell processor have 130w TDP.
X prefix is tell processor have 95w TDP.

There're 2 of W prefix processor in 5000 series.
W5580 at 3.2 GHz turbo boost 3.43 GHz
W5590 at 3.3 GHz turbo boost 3.6 GHz

Oh, my bad

Need another coffee

[Amethyst]

Originally Posted by 666sheep

Oh, my bad

Need another coffee

[xcodeSyn]

Originally Posted by Amethyst

W prefix is tell processor have 130w TDP.
X prefix is tell processor have 95w TDP.

Also E prefix for 80W TDP, and L prefix for <80W TDP. However for the 56XX series, all 130W TDP processors such as 5677,5680 and above still have X prefix instead of W, therefore the confusion. Intel apparently abandoned these prefixes in their Sandy/Ivy Bridge-EP lineup.

[Spacedust]

Mine is dual X5570 directly from Apple, but hey how did you get 1333 MHz RAM to work at max speed ?

I've got 1333 MHz RAM and it runs only at 1066 MHz !

My machine is flashed to firmware 5,1.

[xcodeSyn]

Originally Posted by Spacedust

Mine is dual X5570 directly from Apple, but hey how did you get 1333 MHz RAM to work at max speed ?

You need to do a PRAM reset as mentioned here. Click on the Resetting NVRAM / PRAM link to see the steps.

[Spacedust]

Originally Posted by xcodeSyn

You need to do a PRAM reset as mentioned here. Click on the Resetting NVRAM / PRAM link to see the steps.

I did that and no go. Apple CPU's must be locked at 1066 MHz.

[xcodeSyn]

Originally Posted by Spacedust

Apple CPU's must be locked at 1066 MHz.

That's a bummer. It's bad enough that Apple used lidless processors in the first place, and now no memory speed bump even with 5,1 flash. There may be very little performance improvement from 1066 to 1333, but I could understand your frustration.

[tjlazer]

So I can install a i7 970 in my single processor 2009 Mac Pro? How does that CPU compare to the proper Xeon Hex core w36x0?

[xcodeSyn]

Originally Posted by tjlazer

So I can install a i7 970 in my single processor 2009 Mac Pro? How does that CPU compare to the proper Xeon Hex core w36x0?

Yes, you can if you choose to after upgrading to firmware 5,1 of course. The i7 970 is equivalent to the W3670 Xeon but without ECC memory support and only supports memory speed up to 1066MHz. Your ECC memory would be wasted and you can use non-ECC desktop memory instead.

[Spacedust]

Originally Posted by xcodeSyn

That's a bummer. It's bad enough that Apple used lidless processors in the first place, and now no memory speed bump even with 5,1 flash. There may be very little performance improvement from 1066 to 1333, but I could understand your frustration.

Don't worry - I will switch to X5670's or X5675's in about two year time.

[tjlazer]

Originally Posted by xcodeSyn

Yes, you can if you choose to after upgrading to firmware 5,1 of course. The i7 970 is equivalent to the W3670 Xeon but without ECC memory support and only supports memory speed up to 1066MHz. Your ECC memory would be wasted and you can use non-ECC desktop memory instead.

Thanks! I also started my own thread, this is good news indeed if you can find a cheap i7, it seems they are pretty prices still.

[shelant]

Did you use nylon or metal washers? Also, did you use 2mm thermal pad? Silicone? Is this one good enough?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...A1THAZDOWP300U

Thanks

Originally Posted by Amethyst

I've just upgrade my old 8-core 2.26 GHz Mac Pro to use a new pair of x5570.
Thats means now i've own a mac that once time its cost 5,899 USD!!!!!

Form my experience i want to share 5 things.

1.) I've using 2.1 mm of washer (0.7mm x 3), and it work great!! you just tighten the screw and it set, no fan problem ho heat problem. (Idle 44c under Ambient 39c very hot in Thailand)
2.) I doesn't adjust, modify fan connector just use it as it come.
3.) I've add 2mm thermal pad to my heatsink, Add from pink thermal pad.
4.) It's very very easy. Doesn't need to hesitate.
5.) About the processor.
- I choose x5570 over 6-core variant because it much cheaper.I've paid just $380 for two of these. (vs $400 for just one of 6-core 2.4GHz that much lower frequency)
- I choose x5570 over w5590. Because it TDP is 95watt, follow Apple specification, I know w5590 can use without problem in 2009 pro. but my home is very very hot so i think i need lower TDP than +0.3 GHz max frequency.
- Another thing is about my dream, in 2009 I've dream to own the most expensive mac money can buy (8x2.93 Nehalem). That time i can't do. Today it very affordable to do.Why not?

Image