|
|
#1 |
|
Microsoft Surface Pro Hacked to Run OS X...Maybe
![]() ![]() Comments on the YouTube video are largely skeptical, suggesting that it's simply a remote desktop connection to a Mac. However, there's no technical reason why a Surface Pro shouldn't be able to run a hacked version of OS X, and Neowin notes that Wi-Fi reportedly is not working on the machine. One of the main challenges with Hackintosh installations tends to be with drivers for functions like Wi-Fi, so its absence may lend some support to the legitimacy of the claim. Article Link: Microsoft Surface Pro Hacked to Run OS X...Maybe |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Cool that someone pulled it off but I don't really see the practical appeal when you compare it with say a Macbook Air, in terms of price, battery life, etc.
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Safari seems... sluggish
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
#4 |
|
If a computer is x86 and fairly modern it has a good chance of running OS X. This shouldn't be a surprise. Methods for running OS X have become simpler as time goes on. EFI emulation , DSDT's and decrypters such as fakesmc.kext make it less painful now compared to the Tiger days.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wow! Finally a reason to buy a Microsoft Surface!
__________________
Voted "Most likely to start his own cult" by my high school class. |
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I hope this is real, i can have the Hardware i want with the OS i want.
Apple, take a note, THIS is what the iPad Air could have been. ---------- If a macbook air had a touchscreen, and detachable keyboard/cover you'd be right.
__________________
MacBook Pro/iPad Mini/ TV1/iMac/iPhone5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Does OSX even support a touchscreen? How did he make that work?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
MS Office on iPad is news. Not Apple guy bricks surface...
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#10 |
|
No real advantage here because OSX is not a touch aware OS. I have a Hackintosh that I use at home and it works great, but I have had to do some kludgy things to make it work. Like a Creative USB external sound card, and I just finally found a good wi-fi card for it.
If and when Apple moves to touch as part of OSX, the surface might be interesting, but as it is now, who would want a Surface with OSX? A MBA would be a much better choice.
__________________
27" iMac, 3.4 GHz i7; 15" MBP, 2.53 GHz Core 2 Duo; 13" MBA 1.7 GHz i5; iPad (3rd Gen), 16 GB; iPhone 4S; Hackintosh, 3.4 GHz i7 (2600k)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#11 |
|
There is, however a technical reason why it can't be done at the moment.
It has a secured bootloader that hasn't been cracked. ONLY Windows 8 is permitted to boot. There hasn't been a crack yet to the bootloader, so this is physically impossible! Faker than fake. (MAYBE it's OS X server running in a VM? totally possible. VMWare allows OSX server [not regular OS X] to be installed in a VM.)
__________________
Last edited by spyguy10709; Tomorrow at 07:10 AM. |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I posted before watching the video and I call complete BS. Since he is touching the screen there has to be some intermediary software turning the touch into something that OSX understands. You could not just install OSX on a device with touch and have anything happen unless you had drivers (Kext files) for that device to turn it into the equivalent of mouse events. This is almost certainly a remote desktop pretending to be a hackintosh.
__________________
27" iMac, 3.4 GHz i7; 15" MBP, 2.53 GHz Core 2 Duo; 13" MBA 1.7 GHz i5; iPad (3rd Gen), 16 GB; iPhone 4S; Hackintosh, 3.4 GHz i7 (2600k)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The Apple logo on the bezel looks all blocky and stuff.
__________________
MacBook Air: 1.6GHz/4GB RAM/128GB/Mac OS X 10.8.2 iPhone 4S: Black 64GB iPad 4: Black 16GB WiFi |
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
#14 |
|
We all knew this would happen.
__________________
13" MBP 2011, Galaxy Note 2 (oh noes i automatically become an apple hater) (Sorry for bad english, not my mother tongue!) |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
15" Retina MBP, 2.7 Ghz Quad Core i7, 16 GB RAM, 768 GB SSD 24" iMac, 2.8 GHz, 4GB RAM, 320 GB HD; 64 GB iPad 4G LTE; 64 GB iPhone 4 S⃣ |
||
|
|
13
|
|
|
#19 |
|
I'm sure Apple is taking notes right now thanks to your comment, lol.
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
#20 |
|
OS X is not a touch aware OS, no, but it is gesture aware, and if you look at features like Mission Control and Launchpad, you can't help but wonder if the next step will be to integrate touch.
I was really impressed with Surface when I had a look at it a while back. But, I think there are still issues. It is clearly not meant to be a touch-screen only interface; if you were to buy a Surface tablet without either the Touch Cover or the Type Cover, you're going to have a very hard time. To me, for regular apps, touching the screen can be a great, tactile, natural input method, but it must augment the keyboard/mouse/trackpad, not replace it. You're not going to get far using Photoshop or Excel using only the touch screen.
__________________
. |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
Quote:
http://www.zdnet.com/why-did-microso...ed-7000010935/ Quote:
__________________
MBA (13" 1.7 GHz 128GB), UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 32GB iPad 3 WiFi+LTE, 64 GB iPad WiFi, 32 GB iPhone 5, Airport Extreme |
|||
|
|
4
|
|
|
#23 |
|
|
2
|
|
|
#24 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#25 |
|
If they do manage to make ML run flawlessly on the SP, I purchase one immediately.
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.










TV1/iMac/iPhone5
Hackintosh, 3.4 GHz i7 (2600k)
Linear Mode
