Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 28, 2013, 04:45 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Executives and Directors Required to Hold 3x - 10x Base Salary in AAPL Stock




Apple has changed its corporate bylaws [PDF] to require executives officers to hold three times their annual base salary in stock, with Non-Employee Directors holding five times their annual retainer and Tim Cook required to hold ten times his annual base salary in stock.

The requirement for executives went into effect February 6th, while the requirement for Cook and the Directors went into effect back in November.

From The Wall Street Journal:
Quote:
Calpers discussed the new executive-ownership requirement with the Apple board before the meeting, according to Anne Simpson, head of corporate governance for Calpers, who declined to elaborate. The fund has long regarded executive stock ownership "as standard good practice," she said. "It's part of our conversation with all companies we engage." Ms. Simpson said in an interview Wednesday that "there are other changes in the works related to executive pay."
Proposal No. 5, an item that was voted on at the recent Apple Shareholder's Meeting, would have required executives to hold 33 percent of their equity pay until retirement. Apple felt this requirement was too onerous and instead adopted stockholding requirements relating to base yearly salary.

The base salaries of most senior executives will be $875,000 for 2013, while Tim Cook's salary will be $1.4 million this year. Non-employee board members receive a $50,000 yearly retainer.

Article Link: Apple Executives and Directors Required to Hold 3x - 10x Base Salary in AAPL Stock
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 04:47 PM   #2
komodrone
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
So if Steve Jobs was still here, his $1 salary would mean....
komodrone is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 04:50 PM   #3
abz1981
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by komodrone View Post
So if Steve Jobs was still here, his $1 salary would mean....
I really think you need to move on, let Steve go buddy. We have Tim and Jonny and the team now. I know bereavement is tough. However you got to let it go.
__________________
13.3" Macbook Air 2011, 1.7GHz, 4 GB RAM, 128GB flash storage; Apple Iphone 5 16GIG Black.
abz1981 is offline   41 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 04:52 PM   #4
Compile 'em all
macrumors 601
 
Compile 'em all's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
1.4 mil doesn't sound like much.
__________________
Compile 'em all is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 04:52 PM   #5
R2D2 xx
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
It still amazes me how much some people make.
R2D2 xx is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 04:53 PM   #6
iAppl3Fan
macrumors 6502a
 
iAppl3Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by abz1981 View Post
I really think you need to move on, let Steve go buddy. We have Tim and Jonny and the team now. I know bereavement is tough. However you got to let it go.
Thank you very much!
__________________
 13" MacBook Air (Mid 2013) + Dual 27" Thunderbolt Display
 15" MacBook Pro with Retina Display (Mid 2012) + 24" LED Cinema Display
 TV |  Time Capsule |  iPod |  iPhone |  iPad Air/mini
iAppl3Fan is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 04:56 PM   #7
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Wonder if Jony Ive has to comply since he's not a named executive officer of the company.
__________________
"When we se something huge and powerful we aspire to make it small and meaningful."— Jony Ive 
Rogifan is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 04:58 PM   #8
KylePowers
macrumors 68000
 
KylePowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compile 'em all View Post
1.4 mil doesn't sound like much.
He gets all his money from stocks anyway, since I believe they're taxed a lot less.
KylePowers is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:06 PM   #9
zin
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compile 'em all View Post
1.4 mil doesn't sound like much.
It's also 40 times the average retail store employee's salary and 245 times the average salary of somebody assembling the products.

It's all relative.
zin is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:11 PM   #10
bassfingers
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by zin View Post
It's also 40 times the average retail store employee's salary and 245 times the average salary of somebody assembling the products.

It's all relative.
From my experience, the consequences of his decisions merits at least 40x that of any retail employee.
bassfingers is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:12 PM   #11
topgunn
macrumors 65816
 
topgunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
And Steve Jobs' family is required to hold 100 times his annual salary in Apple stock or 1/6 of a share.
topgunn is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:15 PM   #12
basesloaded190
macrumors 68030
 
basesloaded190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Send a message via AIM to basesloaded190
Quote:
Originally Posted by zin View Post
It's also 40 times the average retail store employee's salary and 245 times the average salary of somebody assembling the products.

It's all relative.
And also 1/48th of Ralph Lauren's. It's tiny in comparison to other CEO's of major corporations.
__________________
2011 MacBook Pro 15 HR Anti-Glare, Etymotic ER-4p, iPhone 4 32GB
Twitter
basesloaded190 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:23 PM   #13
UnfetteredMind
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quote:
C. Compliance/Timing
The applicable guideline level of Company stock ownership is expected to be satisfied within five years after November 13, 2012 for the CEO and Non-Employee Directors, within five years after February 6, 2013 for Executive Officers or, within five years after first becoming subject to these Stock Ownership Guidelines.
Once the CEO’s, Executive Officer’s, or Non-Employee Director’s level of stock ownership satisfies the applicable guideline, ownership of the guideline amount is expected to be maintained for as long as the individual is subject to these Stock Ownership Guidelines.
So they have 5 years to get to this level. I also see nothing regarding the timing or periodical nature of confirmation. Do they have to constantly review and determine if they meet this as the stock price fluctuates or is it just checked periodically (eg: 4 times a year)? Seems a bit ... odd.
UnfetteredMind is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:24 PM   #14
bdavis89
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by abz1981 View Post
I really think you need to move on, let Steve go buddy. We have Tim and Jonny and the team now. I know bereavement is tough. However you got to let it go.
Pretty sure it was a joke. Don't know how that qualifies as bereavement.
bdavis89 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:29 PM   #15
futbalguy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by basesloaded190 View Post
And also 1/48th of Ralph Lauren's. It's tiny in comparison to other CEO's of major corporations.
I think most people would agree the executives pay should be based on the stock value and not a fixed annual salary that doesnt rise or fall based on company performance. All that matters is total compensation and Tim Cook certainly is being rewarded with significant compensation.
futbalguy is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:33 PM   #16
icomment
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdavis89 View Post
Pretty sure it was a joke. Don't know how that qualifies as bereavement.
Sarcasm radiates off that post.
icomment is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:38 PM   #17
TallManNY
macrumors 68020
 
TallManNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Well thank god they give these guys enough in stock options to have and hold this amount pretty easily.
__________________
Mid-2011 3.1GHz i5 iMac (6970m); HP Spectre (Win 8.1)
BBRY Q10; iPhone 6; iPad Mini-R
Apple Stockholder (a nice dividend, stock buybacks and cutting edge innovation? yes please!)
TallManNY is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 05:53 PM   #18
glenthompson
macrumors Demi-God
 
glenthompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Virginia
Good to see. More companies should take this approach. I've always felt that the higher up the food chain you are, the more your compensation should be based on company performance. For CEOs it should be 75% to 90% of the total package. Company takes a loss for the year, then your pay goes way down. Companies that pay executives bonuses when they lose money should be driven out of business.
__________________
15" MBP (late 2011), iPhone 5
iPad Air, ATV3 Mac Pro 3,1
glenthompson is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 06:01 PM   #19
lwapps
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenthompson View Post
Good to see. More companies should take this approach. I've always felt that the higher up the food chain you are, the more your compensation should be based on company performance. For CEOs it should be 75% to 90% of the total package. Company takes a loss for the year, then your pay goes way down. Companies that pay executives bonuses when they lose money should be driven out of business.
But then how do you account for a decreased in performance due to factors which are out of your control. A CEO would say it was unfair that his pay was decreased if the company takes a loss if, say, the economy went into a recession that year.

It sounds like a good idea but I think it becomes a lot more complicated in practice.
__________________
LW Apps iPhone iOS Applications
LW Apps Twitter
Best iPhone Apps: Studious Diary/Planner: bit.ly/PqTzyw Are You Normal?: m.lwapps.com/15HN0it Phys Pad: bit.ly/Pj86Oa
lwapps is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 06:26 PM   #20
Swift
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
1.4 million?

Yeah, but he's just selling people a million copies of something they make.

Now, for big money, go into healthcare... the CEOs really make out blackmailing people to pay to save their lives.
Swift is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 06:38 PM   #21
MattInOz
macrumors 68030
 
MattInOz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift View Post
Yeah, but he's just selling people a million copies of something they make.

Now, for big money, go into healthcare... the CEOs really make out blackmailing people to pay to save their lives.
Or banking for much the same reason.
__________________
There is no such thing as "Collective Wisdom"
[ iPhone 5s, iPad Mini, 13" MacBookPro 2.7Ghz, 27"Al iMac i7, Black MacBook 13"]
MattInOz is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 06:42 PM   #22
Nunyabinez
macrumors 6502a
 
Nunyabinez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Provo, UT
Quote:
Originally Posted by futbalguy View Post
I think most people would agree the executives pay should be based on the stock value and not a fixed annual salary that doesnt rise or fall based on company performance. All that matters is total compensation and Tim Cook certainly is being rewarded with significant compensation.
Uh no they don't. You assume that stock price is a direct function of how well a company is being run and that is ridiculous. Look at the different financial ratios and compare say Google and Apple. You will see that the stock price can move quite independently of good management by executives and objective measures of performance.

Also, lets say my compensation is all tied to stock performance. Let's see... how could I quickly pump up my stock price so I could sell and make a bunch of money. I could cut expenses. What is really expensive to companies? Oh yeah, people! They cost a lot. I'll layoff 5000 employees, cut expenses pump up my stock and make a fortune. Guess what? This has happened more times than you would like to know. I would rather have a CEO draw a huge salary than give him compensation that he has the direct ability to manipulate for his own selfish desires.
__________________
iMac w/Retina 4GHz; 27" iMac, 3.4 GHz i7; 15" MBP, 2.53 GHz Core 2 Duo; 13" MBA 1.7 GHz i5; iPad (3rd Gen); iPad Mini; iPhone 6+;
Nunyabinez is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 06:52 PM   #23
cycomiko
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwapps View Post
But then how do you account for a decreased in performance due to factors which are out of your control. A CEO would say it was unfair that his pay was decreased if the company takes a loss if, say, the economy went into a recession that year.

It sounds like a good idea but I think it becomes a lot more complicated in practice.
in my job, if my company is failing - for whatever reason - I get paid less, through our bonus structure.

It doesnt matter if the problem is CEOrelated, or the market taking a dive, I get paid less. Hell, if head office change stuff that ultimately removes my depart,ments ability to make money, irrespective of the value we provide, we get less $$..

thats life.

CEOs should play by same rules.
cycomiko is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 07:05 PM   #24
Krazy Bill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Maybe Al Gore can get Al Jazeera to kick in his share?
Krazy Bill is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 07:19 PM   #25
Larry-K
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Oh, the hardships these people must endure!
Larry-K is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Executives Receive Restricted Stock Bonuses Worth More Than $12 Million Each MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 32 Mar 6, 2014 08:42 PM
AAPL - Apple Stock Ferrarienzo Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 8 Jan 4, 2014 02:14 PM
Apple stock sinks 5% / AAPL Downgraded After iPhone Release [MERGED] cymolia Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 43 Sep 16, 2013 10:19 PM
Apple Directors Bill Campbell and Millard Drexler Exercise and Sell Stock Options Worth $13.8 Million MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 15 Aug 1, 2013 10:01 PM
Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer Sells $16.4 Million in AAPL Stock MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 45 Jul 31, 2013 12:12 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC