|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
1G iPod shuffle On the Way Out?
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif
The Street speculates that the 1GB iPod shuffle is to be replaced or removed from the Apple product line, based on growing evidence: * A survey of Apple retail stores. * Apple's online store, which still says "Currently Unavailable" for the 1GB iPod shuffle, as noted in mid-December. * The unavailability of this iPod model at major retailers, including amazon.com. This further supports previous rumors that Apple will introduce new iPod shuffles at Macworld San Francisco. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
I bought the 512mb shuffle because the price point was right at $99 for such a bare-bones player. $149 is really too much for anything without a screen. Whichever model gets dropped, the 149 price point has to go
__________________
--------------------------------- You call this a bagel?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey
|
Quote:
__________________
Aluminum iMac (Early 2009) 24", 2.66 GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD 10.5 Leopard, iLife '09, iWork '09 First Gen. iPod touch, 8 GB |
|
|
|
| hyperpasta |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by hyperpasta |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Nano Nano
Why not just a lower capacity Nano? They should just get rid of it.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Cept the shuffle's smaller, lighter, and more durable by far.. scratches don't effect it's usage.
I have a shuffle, a nano, and a video ipod, each for different situations (overkill, clearly), but honestly, I don't give a toss about new ipods, I want fast, light, and fast laptops ASAP. Quote:
__________________
My 12" PB 'sploded, just like this: KABLAM! |
|
|
|
| Some_Big_Spoon |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Some_Big_Spoon |
|
|
#6 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: On the roadside
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey
|
So far, we have rumors for:
- New Super-Thin Intel iBooks in 13" and 15" - New Media Center Intel Mac minis - New Super-Thin Dual Core Intel Powerbooks with iSight in 13", 15", and 17" - New iPod shuffles (smaller, black) - Modestly bumped iPod nanos (3GB and 6GB?) - "iPod Boombox" of some sort - New AirPort with 802.11n, Video Streaming - iLife 06 - iWork 06 with "Numbers" Wow. Some keynote.
__________________
Aluminum iMac (Early 2009) 24", 2.66 GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD 10.5 Leopard, iLife '09, iWork '09 First Gen. iPod touch, 8 GB |
|
|
| hyperpasta |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by hyperpasta |
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
great! smaller, thinner, screen (hopefully colour), and one of those cool nano-esque necklaces.
__________________
the progressive horizon : a journal of sorts of a film/biology double major, pre-medicine entrepreneur |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jun 2004
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey
|
Quote:
Personally, I think we won't see the iBook released until a few months after MWSF. The dual-core (read PowerBook) Yonahs are coming first, and the Mac mini doesn't have to be sent out right away. If Apple ships a stunningly thin laptop with a dual-core chip and a built-in iSight, it will instantly convert those PowerPC fanboys to Intel and make everyone very excited indeed. The iBook will be more powerful than the current one, but not jaw-droppingly so. In addition, there is nothing to substantiate the iPod boombox rumor, and the report was vague.
__________________
Aluminum iMac (Early 2009) 24", 2.66 GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD 10.5 Leopard, iLife '09, iWork '09 First Gen. iPod touch, 8 GB |
|
|
|
| hyperpasta |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by hyperpasta |
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Quote:
Yeah, and they also might just throw the new Mac Mini into the same boxes as the old model and not say anything about it.
__________________
"What if somebody broke in and did laundry, and they forgot to empty the lint screen?! They could start a fire!!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Quote:
well, ok, not really. but almost. as a member of my school's newspaper, i tried to get press passes, as was possible for my friends in previous years, but for some reason apple and img (i think) tightened the restrictions this year, so all i got was a free exhibit hall pass. its still worth it; i'm going on the 10th! |
|
|
|
| asherman13 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by asherman13 |
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
I really believe that the Shuffle was what it was only to meet a certain price point. If the next generation can be a real iPod at the same prices instead of a stripped-down Rio, I think they'd be all over that.
Last edited by iMeowbot : Dec 30, 2005 at 10:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: in transit
|
I think Apple just needs to KISS...
Keep It Simple Stupid. The original Shuffle design was pure simplicity, no extra bells or whistles. It just does one thing, but it does it well at a cheap price and very few parts to break and/or scratch. I'd much rather have it without a screen to mess up or more extra buttons to press. Make it smaller, increase the battery life, and up the capacity and I'll be first in line to buy one. |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
|
Quote:
10 updates in the very near future I could see though - several at MWSF, and then the remainder in the following weeks - Apple has done this many times before, where major products have been announced throughout the rest of January and February following MWSF... Can't wait to see what happens!
__________________
My riches consist not in the extent of my possessions, but in the fewness of my wants. - J. Brotherton |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Whistleway |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Whistleway |
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ailleurs
|
what if the intent is to do away with the shuffles altogether and expand the nano into the price bracket instead? it would certainly solve the shuffles with screens issue...
__________________
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal a loaf of bread." —Anatole France |
|
|
| BlueRevolution |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BlueRevolution |
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Quote:
But with 1 GB of music, it might be too arduous to navigate songs without a screen, so Apple might introduce a new shuffle with an extra button or feature to traverse multiple playlists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I live in a giant bucket!
|
I bet the rumors are true and will black and white. Same form factor I bet but topping out with a two giger.
|
|
|
| Dr. Dastardly |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Dr. Dastardly |
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
Once a shuffle gets past 1gig it really needs to have some sort of screen. They should integrate the shuffle into a cell phone battery and create a way to make it work thru the phone.
Ideally, I would like the shuffle to be small enough to clip on your ear. Or integrated inside of really cool headphones. |
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
|
agree! it's better to keep but to lower the prize.
I have a 512 Mb shuffle and a ipod video 30GB - fits me perfectly. the nano is really nice - but when i want small and low weight - for excercise shuffle is best. but for trips - the video is great. Quote:
|
|
|
|
| freddiecable |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by freddiecable |
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home
|
The appeal of the shuffle?
I never saw the appeal of the iPod Shuffle. I would miss the use of the LCD. I'm still waiting for the iPod to include a FM tuner so I can listen to the TVs at the gym.
__________________
Faasnat ...on since 1984 |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
wouldnt surprise me
eol of the 1 gig shuffle would not surprise me at all, the 512 is much more popular and much more logical $$ wise.
__________________
15" Powerbook G4 1.5 ghz Mac Pro Dual Quad 2.8 ghz Nikon D50 PSWii60 on my 42" lcd |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Studio City
|
What I would like to see
them integrate the remote control with the shuffle. make it the remote for all future Macs. as generations go by they can get bigger in capacity, but never really change shape or look. if apple really wants to take over the home media area, i cajnt think of a better way than to put the control in the hands of everybody before they even have the service. I would love to have this with frontrow. kinda reminds me of like, the 1 month free of aol. also, for whose who dont buy a new computer they can charge 149 still and probably make at least te same profits. if for example they could charge $99 for the 1gig shuffle, they can charge 149 for the shuffle remote.
ak |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|