Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 12, 2006, 02:45 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
QuarkXPress 7 Coming Soon?

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

According to Macworld.co.uk, Quark is gathering the press for an official launch event for QuarkXPress 7 at the Congress Centre in London on June 2. As the site notes, this is the strongest evidence yet that Quark is readying to ship version 7 of their over-due flagship desktop publishing application.

Quark has seen greatly increased competitive pressure from Adobe's InDesign in recent years. A recent Macworld.co.uk poll shows that consumers are split in general between the competing platforms.
MacRumors is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:47 PM   #2
morespce54
macrumors 65816
 
morespce54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Around the World
It's darn about time !!!
__________________
..:.::.:.:.::..:.: Oh, I get it. It's very clever :.:.::.:.:.::.:..:.::..:.::.:..:.::.:.::.:.::..
DO NOT OPERATE YOUR COMPUTER UNDER THE INFLUENCE!
morespce54 is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:48 PM   #3
CaptainScarlet
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CheeseLand
Send a message via AIM to CaptainScarlet
The question is though...Will it have a universal binary?
CaptainScarlet is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:48 PM   #4
Blue Velvet
Demi-Goddess (Moderator emeritus)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Someone around here is attending that event after getting emails from Quark yesterday. Of course, the free food was the main attraction... but I expect some very interesting conversations to take place.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainScarlet
The question is though...Will it have a universal binary?
Yes.
Blue Velvet is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:48 PM   #5
SFVCyclone
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pasadena, Ca
Send a message via AIM to SFVCyclone
If you work in Pre-press this is not a welcomed thing.
__________________
My website ZNRGStudios.com My Blog
SFVCyclone is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:50 PM   #6
longofest
Demi-God (Editor)
 
longofest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Send a message via AIM to longofest
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainScarlet
The question is though...Will it have a universal binary?
QuarkXPress 7 is indeed UB. See their website. It is in beta now, but should ship as UB. If it doesn't actually ship as UB, then it will be an update soon afterwards (kind of like Digital Performer 5 by MOTU in the music realm).
longofest is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:51 PM   #7
snkTab
macrumors 6502a
 
snkTab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
According to Macworld.co.uk, Quark gathing the press for an official launch event for QuarkXPress 7 is the strongest evidence yet that Quark is readying to ship version 7.

Now that's a logical assumption.
snkTab is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:57 PM   #8
dizastor
macrumors 6502a
 
dizastor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Too bad it's too late...

This sucker better really innovate to get anyone to consider it. All of the companies I've freelanced at over the last 2 years are either in the process of phasing out or already have phased out Quark completely.

I dread having to open a file in Quark these days.

Luckily my company recently purchased the wonderful Q2ID4 quark import plugin for InDesign. It works flawlessly 90% of the time.
__________________
ejc on Twitter
dizastor is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:57 PM   #9
Daschund
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York Citeeeeeeyyyy!
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainScarlet
The question is though...Will it have a universal binary?
Quark said since the beginning that version 7 would be UB. They already got burned out enough when they took too long to release an OS X version and lost a ton of market share to InDesign.
__________________
Photography
Daschund is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 02:58 PM   #10
longofest
Demi-God (Editor)
 
longofest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Send a message via AIM to longofest
Quote:
Originally Posted by snkTab
According to Macworld.co.uk, Quark gathing the press for an official launch event for QuarkXPress 7 is the strongest evidence yet that Quark is readying to ship version 7.

Now that's a logical assumption.
Hey, you never can tell with Quark... they like to keep pushing crap back and pulling "Next Tuesdays" on us
longofest is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 03:01 PM   #11
Blue Velvet
Demi-Goddess (Moderator emeritus)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
There are two things I want to know: how much is it (or our site license) going to cost? And when is v7.1 due out?

When 6.0 was released, there were useful discounts for the upgrade for about a month or so but anyone who uses Quark day-in, day-out knows that they don't have a great track record on x.0 releases.

So... buy it straight away to save pennies but don't install it until the early adopters can show you their battle-scars.

Oh, and by the way. Yeah, we know Quark suxxorz and InDesign roolz...
Blue Velvet is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 03:12 PM   #12
SFVCyclone
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pasadena, Ca
Send a message via AIM to SFVCyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Velvet
Oh, and by the way. Yeah, we know Quark suxxorz and InDesign roolz...
If you're talking about Indesign CS1 then maybe yeah, but 2.o PSHHHHH, Theyre both on the same level really.
__________________
My website ZNRGStudios.com My Blog
SFVCyclone is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 03:18 PM   #13
babble
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Quebec
I just hope this new version won'T ba as buggy as 6.5...
babble is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 03:19 PM   #14
Blue Velvet
Demi-Goddess (Moderator emeritus)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFVCyclone
If you're talking about Indesign CS1 then maybe yeah, but 2.o PSHHHHH, Theyre both on the same level really.
Having used InDesign for a few freelance projects recently, I would respectfully disagree. InDesign offers a level of control over so many aspects of typography and layout that Quark 6 can only dream of dreaming of.

However, Quark has some nice features that are not replicated in the current release of InDesign.


My take:

InDesign — creatively-inspiring but a bit cumbersome and palette-heavy.
Quark — clunky but extremely fast in the hands of someone who knows what they're doing.
Blue Velvet is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 03:33 PM   #15
Doctor Q
macrumors god
 
Doctor Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blood Donation Center
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Velvet
My take:

InDesign — creatively-inspiring but a bit cumbersome and palette-heavy.
Quark — clunky but extremely fast in the hands of someone who knows what they're doing.
That makes sense. One (inDesign) is relatively new (in the geologic sense), full of features but not refined over as much time. The other (QuarkXPress) is more of a legacy product, fine-tuned over the eons but more set in its ways.
__________________
I support the MacRumors Blood Drive!
Doctor Q is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 03:43 PM   #16
FoxyKaye
macrumors 68000
 
FoxyKaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oakland, Terre d'Ange, Bas Lag, Gallifrey
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenmonsterman
Too bad it's too late...

I dread having to open a file in Quark these days.
Quark 6 really burned our magazine's production department, so much so everyone kept using 4.01 under Classic. I won't even mention Quark 5, which we thankfully avoided using.

I wonder if 7 will ship with a letter of apology as well?

I'd add to Dr. Q's assessment of Quark vs. InDesign by saying that when I first started using InDesign, it felt "cluttered."
__________________
Core i7/2.66 GHz 17" 2010 MacBook Pro | 64GB iPod Touch
He was no Dragon... Fire cannot kill a Dragon.
FoxyKaye is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 03:58 PM   #17
lazyboy922
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Whoopty doo. This software is so late, I don't know if anyone would bother even using it. Most people have converted to indesign by now, unless they have been using Quark since the beginning. Indesign just goes so well with illustrator and photoshop, I think it would be silly to go back to Quark now. They really hurt themselves by taking so long to upgrade their software. It will be interesting to see how it pans out.
lazyboy922 is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 04:03 PM   #18
Blue Velvet
Demi-Goddess (Moderator emeritus)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazyboy922
Most people have converted to indesign by now...
That's the perception but not the reality. Most estimates still put Quark at around 60% market-share. There is also some distortion in these figures due to InDesign being bundled with the Creative Suite.

The fat lady is still running through her scales...
Blue Velvet is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 04:07 PM   #19
starflyer
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Send a message via AIM to starflyer
Quark Is Dead.
starflyer is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 04:15 PM   #20
longofest
Demi-God (Editor)
 
longofest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Send a message via AIM to longofest
Quote:
Originally Posted by starflyer
Quark Is Dead.
If dead == still alive, then perhaps yes.
longofest is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 04:22 PM   #21
sinisterdesign
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: atlanta
i've used Quark on & off for years, but i've never LIKED the program. it's always seemed clunky, it's needlessly slow to get some things done and the quickkeys always seemed cryptic. maybe that was b/c i'm so used to adobe's quickkeys, but nonetheless it's still a little bassackwards.
__________________
DESKTOP | 27" core i7 iMac
LAPTOP | 2.3GHz Core i7 15" Retina Macbook Pro
iTHINGS | iPhone 4, iPad, iPods of various generations
sinisterdesign is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 04:29 PM   #22
Armaggideon
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Shumen, Bulgaria
Quote:
Originally Posted by longofest
QuarkXPress 7 is indeed UB. See their website. It is in beta now, but should ship as UB. If it doesn't actually ship as UB, then it will be an update soon afterwards (kind of like Digital Performer 5 by MOTU in the music realm).
I've gone through three beta releases of QXP 7 during the past few months and the third, which I'm using now is the best so far And yes, it is UB. I haven't had the chance to test it on an Intel Mac yet though.

Version 7 is miles ahead of 6.5, it supports Unicode, Open Type and other handy improvements, too many to mention here. I really dread using 6.5 and below, since I work with plenty of languages and it's hell trying to cheat the bugger to display any different script acurately. Not to mention the rendering, which kind of reminds me of Windows Unfortunately, many client source files are Quark, so I have to play along.

I throw party every time I get to work in InDesign. Sadly, some of the designers of the original files haven't bothered to upgrade their fifteen-year-old habits but such is life
Armaggideon is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 04:31 PM   #23
iGary
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Randy's House
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

According to Macworld.co.uk, Quark is gathering the press for an official launch event for QuarkXPress 7 at the Congress Centre in London on June 2. As the site notes, this is the strongest evidence yet that Quark is readying to ship version 7 of their over-due flagship desktop publishing application.

Quark has seen greatly increased competitive pressure from Adobe's InDesign in recent years. A recent Macworld.co.uk poll shows that consumers are split in general between the competing platforms.
If Quark only made PhotoShop. I'll be buying Quark 7 purely out of spite against Adobe - this means I go back to my Quark roots again after switching to InDesign.
iGary is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 04:32 PM   #24
Riot_Mac
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: IL
Send a message via AIM to Riot_Mac
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFVCyclone
If you work in Pre-press this is not a welcomed thing.
youre right! I hate Quark. We recently switched to InDesign and we are not looking back. Down with Quark!
__________________
"hear my name, take a good look,
this could be the day"
Riot_Mac is offline   0
Old May 12, 2006, 04:40 PM   #25
iGary
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Randy's House
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFVCyclone
If you work in Pre-press this is not a welcomed thing.
I've never heard one pre-pree person bitch abotu Quark.....ever.

I've heard plenty of bitching about InDesign.

I think Blue's comments regarding the two suites is dead on.
iGary is offline   0

 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eclipse 3.5 and NetBeans 6.7 coming soon, possible same-day release wrldwzrd89 Mac Programming 0 Jun 15, 2009 09:07 AM
Mac OS X 10.5.7 Coming Soon? cabrown iPod 2 Apr 29, 2009 07:00 AM
Toast 7 coming soon? GigaWire Mac Applications and Mac App Store 27 Aug 25, 2005 09:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC