Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro, Power Mac
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 15, 2006, 08:23 AM   #1
tektonnic
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucks, UK
Apple plans ultra-portable PC

Quote:
UNBEATLES FIRM Apple is expected to show off a new "ultra-portable PC" based around flash memory, small bits and bobs and some coloured plastic, at the January Macworld trade show in San Francisco.

The plan has been revealed by UBS Investment Research analyst Ben Reitzes who thinks he has managed to discover that Apple is working on ultra-portable PCs and notebooks equipped with NAND flash memory in order to speed up boot times.

According to Appleinsider, Apple's new chum, Intel plans to make the NAND flash drives and the idea is also being looked at by Microsoft.

Apparently, Apple thinks that its new portables could be the next iPod.

Reitzes adds that they should do quite well in the education sector, which is an Apple stronghold, he says. It's not here, though. Maybe where he lives
Source: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32427
__________________
giggity.

imac 2.4ghz 20" 4gb RAM 10.5 + iphone 8gb 3G + ipod 30 gb 4gen + 900mhz not at all functioning ibook
tektonnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 08:42 AM   #2
Collin973
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wow. If this is true, then EXCELLENT. I'd love to see an Ultra Portable computer made by Apple. I have an older Compaq Ipaq and the thing is great for lots of things. Also, this NAND ram sounds pretty sweet, allowing the computer to boot faster. Many computers today boot pretty quick (around 30 secs) compared to older computers. I turned on this old Windows 98 machine I have in my basement and it took at leas 3 minutes to boot completely. I hope this comes true!!
__________________
MBP | 2.16 | 2 GB | 160 GB
Video Ipod | 5G | 30 GB
WANT - Mac Desktop, maybe?
Collin973 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:01 AM   #3
SpaceMagic
macrumors 68000
 
SpaceMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Munich, Germany
I'd buy one!! make it as cheap as an ipod and i'll buy 3
__________________
MacBook 2Ghz Core2Duo, 320GB HD, 3.3GB RAM + 24" LG LCD
Interested in a bit of easy cooking? italsh.com
SpaceMagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:04 AM   #4
CanadaRAM
Contributor
 
CanadaRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
Quote:
flash memory, small bits and bobs and some coloured plastic... for education
eMate, Anyone?
Been there, done that, almost got the bankruptcy papers.
__________________
Expert
Ex = former, no longer. Spurt = a leak, esp. when caused by water pressure. Expert = a has-been drip under pressure.
CanadaRAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:10 AM   #5
kevin.rivers
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
iPod Pro....
kevin.rivers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:14 AM   #6
princealfie
macrumors 68020
 
princealfie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Salt Lake City UT
Send a message via Yahoo to princealfie
Dang it, I want one now. I would want a dang Tablet Apple. iTABLET anybody?
princealfie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:20 AM   #7
tektonnic
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucks, UK
I wonder whether it will be linked to in anyway the wind-up 'computers for every child in 3rd world' initiative the UN were pushing, i know they showed the thing as green etc. but that was going to use flash technology.
__________________
giggity.

imac 2.4ghz 20" 4gb RAM 10.5 + iphone 8gb 3G + ipod 30 gb 4gen + 900mhz not at all functioning ibook
tektonnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:32 AM   #8
MisterMe
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by tektonnic
I wonder whether it will be linked to in anyway the wind-up 'computers for every child in 3rd world' initiative the UN were pushing, i know they showed the thing as green etc. but that was going to use flash technology.
With 32 GB SATA flash drives going for $1000, the actual computers will be a little bit rich for their blood.
__________________
Neither a borrower nor a lender be
For loan oft loses both itself and friend
William Shakespeare from Hamlet
MisterMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:37 AM   #9
thejadedmonkey
macrumors 68040
 
thejadedmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pa
Send a message via AIM to thejadedmonkey
I'm thinking (ok, hoping) that it'll be a 12" tablet for around (realistically) $1400-$1600. That would be killer for what I (think that I) need for college.
__________________
Mac Mini G4 • MacBook Pro • iPod Nano
"Good judgement comes from experience,
experience comes from bad judgement."
- Mulla Nasrudin
thejadedmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:46 AM   #10
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadaRAM
eMate, Anyone?
Been there, done that, almost got the bankruptcy papers.
Arguably the world wasn't ready for the emate or the Newton at that time. These devices didn't have much in the way of network connectivity and WiFi didn't exist then.

I think now more than any other time people would latch on to this. Something more computer like than a PDA but still a real OSX-based computer. All this based around the near ubiquitous availablity of wireless networks.

We live in interesting times
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:52 AM   #11
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejadedmonkey
I'm thinking (ok, hoping) that it'll be a 12" tablet for around (realistically) $1400-$1600. That would be killer for what I (think that I) need for college.
I think we're possibly talking about smaller devices than that (10.4" screens) and lower price points (£500).

I guess we'll see.
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:56 AM   #12
twistedlegato
macrumors 65816
 
twistedlegato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
this would be quite interesting to see a computer that used NAND...
__________________
Out of the Frying Pan, into the Fire
twistedlegato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 09:57 AM   #13
lexus
macrumors 68000
 
lexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Depends Greatly On The Weather
I would get at least one, more if they were in colors. (I had to get 4 iPod mini's )
__________________
Why?

Last edited by lexus : Jun 15, 2006 at 10:03 AM.
lexus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:05 AM   #14
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Does anyone have a feel for read and write speeds of NAND flash memory. From a quick google it seems the read speed is more or less similar to a hd on an ATA bus. 108MB/s from here: http://www.samsung.com/Products/Semi...512_1024mb.htm

The write speed seems to be an order of magnitude less. This has some serious implications for using this in a machine that isn't a read only device (ok for ipod but not necessarily for a laptop).

Anyone?
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:11 AM   #15
brbubba
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Send a message via AIM to brbubba
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejadedmonkey
I'm thinking (ok, hoping) that it'll be a 12" tablet for around (realistically) $1400-$1600. That would be killer for what I (think that I) need for college.
That would suck when I just bought the black macbook. I can't imagine a flash notebook coming in under 2k.
brbubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:13 AM   #16
bbrosemer
macrumors 6502a
 
bbrosemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Send a message via AIM to bbrosemer
There could still be a hard drive and the OS could be held on the Flash memory so you would only need 5-6 gb of memory for the OS... Can anyone say good idea...
__________________
Can't we all just get along and where Windows and Mac can coexist, ... O wait we already have, thanks Apple
bbrosemer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:18 AM   #17
DavidLeblond
macrumors 68000
 
DavidLeblond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
I think Apple should definately do this. Look at what a huge success the Oragami is!

oh wait...
__________________
www.davidleblond.com
Try my new iPhone game, Claustrophobia!
DavidLeblond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:21 AM   #18
celebrian23
macrumors 65816
 
celebrian23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Under the sun
Send a message via AIM to celebrian23
I'm personally not interested- I don't like ultraportables. But it is still exciting. I hope it wil have an opitcal drive- most ultraportables don't.
__________________
C'est la vie !
celebrian23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:21 AM   #19
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidLeblond
I think Apple should definately do this. Look at what a huge success the Oragami is!

oh wait...


I've been watching the Origami with apple ultraportables in mind. All of the origami implementations I've seen so far have been extremely inelegant (to put it politely!).

Remember before the iPod came along the market for HD based mp3 players didn't really exist either.
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:22 AM   #20
erikamsterdam
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: amsterdam
I don't want to crash your party, but a computer based on NAND memory is not possible yet.
NAND memory has a limited amount of write cycles, it dies after that. It can not handle the load of temp files and swap files. The computer would have a very limited lifetime.
erikamsterdam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:22 AM   #21
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by celebrian23
I'm personally not interested- I don't like ultraportables. But it is still exciting. I hope it wil have an opitcal drive- most ultraportables don't.
That's exactly what the ultraportable doesn't need.
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:26 AM   #22
gloss
macrumors 68040
 
gloss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: around/about
Send a message via AIM to gloss
Quote:
Originally Posted by erikamsterdam
I don't want to crash your party, but a computer based on NAND memory is not possible yet.
NAND memory has a limited amount of write cycles, it dies after that. It can not handle the load of temp files and swap files. The computer would have a very limited lifetime.
And I'm sure that Samsung gave that a lot of thought when they designed the drives.
gloss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:27 AM   #23
thumb
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2005
forget a pda style comptuer, or even a tablet, what apple needs is an ultra weight, well designed smaller laptop.

external cd drive (come one, how often do you use this), 3.5 lbs.

as for flash drive, i have to imagine we are talking about the hybrid flash/platter drives first, i can't imagine apple will be able to leapfrog these and go straight to flash if there is to be any amount of storage.

btw, these laptops well done i see as *more* expensive than the macbook, not less. and i for would be gladly pay it.
thumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:42 AM   #24
Yvan256
macrumors 68040
 
Yvan256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterMe
With 32 GB SATA flash drives going for $1000, the actual computers will be a little bit rich for their blood.
Those 100$ computers only have 512MB of flash memory (probably directly connected to the IDE bus), not a 32GB SATA flash drive.

As for the size of an ultra-portable, I'd want something the size of a Nintendo DS Lite (maybe a bit taller so it's not so "widescreen" once opened).
__________________
Mac mini Core 2 Duo 1.83 GHz/2.5 GiB, Mac mini G4 1.42 GHz/1 GiB, 12" PowerBook G4 1.5 GHz/512 MiB, iPod touch 16 GiB, silver iPod shuffle 1 GiB.

Last edited by Yvan256 : Jun 15, 2006 at 10:54 AM.
Yvan256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2006, 10:51 AM   #25
celebrian23
macrumors 65816
 
celebrian23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Under the sun
Send a message via AIM to celebrian23
Quote:
Originally Posted by emotion
That's exactly what the ultraportable doesn't need.
I guess I'm the rare person who uses their optical drive all the time I'd still like one even if no one else does

Quote:
Originally Posted by thumb
btw, these laptops well done i see as *more* expensive than the macbook, not less. and i for would be gladly pay it.
Agreed. I tink these should fit a niche, and niche computers typically come with a premium.
__________________
C'est la vie !
celebrian23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro, Power Mac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2010, MacRumors.com, LLC