|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended - Coming Soon
![]() Adobe announced that their spring release of Adobe Photoshop CS3 will bring a new "Extended" edition aimed at 3D and video professionals. Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended will include all the features of the standard version, but also incorporate several new features: Quote:
Adobe is offering a FAQ (pdf) about the new Extended edition. No pricing announcements have been made yet, but the release has been reported to be on March 27th at a special event in New York. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Location: Location:
|
As discussed elsewhere in related ythreads, many pro users have been waiting for this -- and other pro software -- to run natively on the Intel based Mac's. It is great news that the wait is now over -- and I am hoping Apple comes out with new pro machines in the not too distant future.
I remember seeing stats somewhere from a survey of pro users as to when they would shift to the Intel based Mac Pro's. I can't remember the exact results (and can't find the survey anywhere) but a majority of users said they were waiting for Photoshop and other software to be native. But if there is no news of new Mac Pro's how long will people hold out even after the release of key pro software? I know I am waiting for the next gen Intel Mac Pro's to replace my G5 tower -- but I am not a pro user -- I just want a new machine! I hope Apple and Adobe have been working together around the release (and shipping) dates so that those of us waiting can have all new stuff to play with
__________________
* real name Alan - if that isn't obvious Last edited by iAlan : Mar 8, 2007 at 02:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 10023
|
Pro Machines
Quote:
__________________
Think Different - Innovate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vermontana
|
So is this a photoshop with a dumbed-down after effects built-in?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia & Northern California
|
I'm going to China in June. I should pick up a copy of CS3. It's only 10RMB, $1.50 or so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
|
|
|
|
| zigziggityzoo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by zigziggityzoo |
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
I don't understand this,
is the new feature supposed to be video editing software like FC??? Apple and Adobe wouldn't want to be competitors in this area, right? Shouldn't the new FCP and FCP:Extreme be able to do whatever the new CS3 add-on is?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Mar 2003
|
Quote:
This is another one of those dicey situations where Apple is competing aggressively against one of their major 3rd party developers. So far it all seems good though...
__________________
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand... Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk hand-in-hand." --Peart |
|
|
|
|
| Analog Kid |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Analog Kid |
|
|
#9 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Why are Adobe doing this? What is missing from these products that make it unable to run on them? So glad there will only ever be 1 version of Mac OS X |
|
|
|
|
| joshysquashy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by joshysquashy |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Sounds like a mini after effects to me.
Why not just improve on PS integration with AE? Less work and more valuable because AE will always have more features than this PS "Extended". |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, UK
|
Because they don't really want you to buy those versions, but the more expensive versions instead. They have just run out of new and interesting things to do, so they have moved onto the squeezing as much money out of people stage.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.4Ghz 500GB (uni) OS X/Windows XP/7/Ubuntu Hackintosh Pro - 2.4Ghz Quad core XP/OS X Media Centre - 2Ghz dual core BluRay Windows 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Peninsula (Northern Silicon Valley)
|
in context?
Quote:
If you check Dell's or HP's websites, for example, you'll see that if you spend as much on the Vista PC as you spend for the Photoshop license you'll probably get Vista Home Premium with the package. Some deals have Home Premium and an LCD monitor for the price of the Photoshop license. Even on the $399 PCs, upgrading to Home Premium bumps the price to $429. More to the point, it looks like any Vista PC that you'd want to use for Photoshop (for example, one with a dual-core CPU) will have at least Home Premium as standard. Home Basic really only shows up with low end systems. The term "rip off" isn't really that appropriate.
__________________
-as Marriage Equality - Have you talked about it with your gay friends, your gay colleagues and your gay relatives? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Burnsville, Minnesota, USA
|
Quote:
#2 - 99.97% of systems that run Home Basic probably won't even run Photoshop. Starter is designed for the 5 year old PC that can barely run XP let alone vista. Add to that the fact that pretty much any system shipping with Vista is shipping with Premium or better. Also Basic is designed for people who use there computer for 4 or so things. Web, mail, photos, chat, etc. The target market isn't for people wanting to use Photoshop. Someone is making a mountain out of an anthill. Yes its retarded in the fact that MS is neutering the OS simply to differentiate each version. The core code is the exact same from version to version. I've never been a fan of this type of selling strategy, be it MS or any other software manufacturer. Back to our regularly scheduled thread on Photoshop. I can't afford Photoshop. And realistically I don't need even half the features of Photoshop. I would really like to see an updated version of Photoshop Elements for Mac.
__________________
-iPod Video 160GB
-MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.33Ghz/3GB RAM/250GB -Newton 4700 (a.k.a iPaq 4700) -Dell 2405FPW 24" Widescreen |
|
|
|
|
| SiliconAddict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SiliconAddict |
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: .. London ..
|
No there won't. Expect Mac OS 11 to come out in several years time. Maybe 2012 or something like that. It's anyone's guess what it'll be called - OSX2 or OSX Pro - but it's coming.
A bit of history: Apple System Software 1 came out in 1984 Apple System Software 2 came out in 1985 ... ... Apple OS 9 came out in 1999 OS X came out in 2001. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Mac_OS_X Only a fool would say that Steve Jobs doesn't have a team working on Apple OS 11 right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
This is what I'm worried about...there's so many programs...how much will this cost?
__________________
White(converted to black) 2.16Ghz Macbook, 3GB RAM, 200GB HD; iPod Touch 32GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
It sounds great!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Windows Vista™ Starter and Home Basic editions are out of luck!
It seems from the Adobe PDF that Windows Vista™ Starter and Home Basic editions will not be supported running Photoshop CS3 and Photoshop CS3 Extended.
|
|
|
|
| celticshade |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by celticshade |
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Here
|
I wonder what the price difference will be.
__________________
ijimk 60 gig iPod 5g; iPod shuffle; dual 1.8 ghz G5 nVidia 6800, 2 gig ram; 20" Cinema display; 1.8 ghz Macbook Pro Last edited by ijimk : Mar 8, 2007 at 02:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
I'm hoping that they price it around the same as CS2. Damn Adobe and their market domination, they charge whatever they please, and we pay for it.
|
|
|
|
| Maccus Aurelius |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Maccus Aurelius |
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: .. London ..
|
Quote:
I suspect 90% of the stuff in PS is relatively cheap to create, or has already paid for itself in older versions. That's what went into PSE. The remaining 10% is probably where the real money and hard professional effort went into, and is being kept for the full CS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Dakota
|
I'm glad to see adobe is changing things up a bit, but I wish they would hurry it up...I guess its better to have a stable release then for them to push it out quickly.
__________________
If you live each day as if it was your last, someday you'll most certainly be right. - Steve Jobs |
|
|
|
| Cult Follower |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Cult Follower |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|