Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:23 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple to Start Record Label with Jay-Z and Beyonce?



Starting in April 2007 there were rumors from MediaTakeOut that rapper Jay-Z was leaving the Def Jam Recordings record label to create a new "super label" with singer Beyonce.
Quote:
In an exclusive interview, MediaTakeOut.com spoke to a key person involved in creating the new label. And according to that insider, the new label will launch early next year. Tells our insider, "It's a done deal. [Jay Z] already has Beyonce and [Mathew Knowles] on board ... She'll be finishing up her contract [with Sony], and I expect that she'll sign on to the new label shortly afterwards."
Jay-Z is a popular rapper and current president and CEO of Def Jam -- a record label owned by Universal Music.

At the time, Jay-Z was reportedly shopping this new "super label" around with the major record labels "and to Apple - who [was] very interested in doing business".

Now, Moli.com is claiming that "an inside industry source" says that its a done deal.
Quote:
[Jay-Z and Beyonce] will move to Apple to run a new music division. It sounds rather incredible: [Jay-Z's] already got a pretty good job, running Def Jam, and [Steve] Jobs may be too smart to get into the tanking recording business (as others have said). Of course, if it is true, my guess is this would be a new, revamped record biz, one based on digital distribution, not boring old physical products.
Coincidentally, Universal Music recently let their long term contract lapse with Apple for iTunes music distribution and have gone on a short term "at will" distribution deal.

The reliability of these sites is unknown, but published for interest as well as due to the existance of a historical rumor trail.


Article Link
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:25 AM   #2
koobcamuk
macrumors 68020
 
koobcamuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Sounds utterly awful.
__________________
|| Get Dropbox! || Photos || My Ph.D ||
koobcamuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:27 AM   #3
Scarlet Fever
macrumors 68040
 
Scarlet Fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bookshop!
please Apple, don't get involved with them. Their 'music' is utter drivel.
__________________
i have stuff. you have stuff. we are all consumers.
Scarlet Fever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:30 AM   #4
Raffles
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
begins to burst out in laughter and disbelief.

Seriously, people, how could you believe this? MR should'nt've even posted then.
Raffles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:31 AM   #5
andrewag
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Australia
Send a message via AIM to andrewag
Wow, this is the strangest rumour ever!
__________________
Every iPod detail database
My macs: MacBook (Alu) 2008 2.4GHz ; PowerMac G5 2005 2x2GHz ; MacBook (black) 2006 2GHz
Moof! - a history of dogcow
andrewag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:31 AM   #6
kymac
macrumors 6502a
 
kymac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: portland
yea.. but theyre really popular.. so making a deal with them would be smart of apple.. because its already known that beyonce and jay z have a large fanbase that is willing to purchase their products. so just because their music isnt appealing to you, doesnt mean its a bad move on apples part.
kymac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:37 AM   #7
MidiMonk
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Don't mind either artist, but if this were true Apple is proving why there are so many issues lately.No focus on computing, just media/gadget ventures
MidiMonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:41 AM   #8
Yixian
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Europe
I'd rather see Apple in movies or games but it'd be good to see them branch out with a music label. This sort of thing would bring them better access to resources, and financially stabalise them even further so they can continue to try far out products.

But Jay-Z? Man, Def Jam is an institution, with an organic history. If Jay-Z were to leave it I'd rather him create something fresh, raw and true to hip hop.

But I guess now we have Blacksmith.
Yixian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:42 AM   #9
Chris Bangle
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Beyonce and Apple. This better be true. She can be the new face of Apple.
__________________
imac G4....Classic II....Performa 6200....2nd gen 4gb blue mini....30gb black 5g....2nd gen 1gb shuffle.....
Chris Bangle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:42 AM   #10
nagromme
macrumors 601
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidiMonk View Post
Don't mind either artist, but if this were true Apple is proving why there are so many issues lately.No focus on computing, just media/gadget ventures
No focus at all, only non-computing stuff! Although... I heard they have a new Mac OS "Leopard" of some kind... and moved their whole computer line to new chips... and just came out with new LED laptops... and are expected to have more new Macs soon...

I'm not sure, though
__________________
nagromme
Would you like a treatment?
nagromme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:47 AM   #11
WildPalms
macrumors 65816
 
WildPalms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
This (if true) could actually be a very canny move on Apple's part. We'll have to wait and see which direction it takes.
__________________
Shiny !
"Yep!..... that went well."
WildPalms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:50 AM   #12
ogun7
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Send a message via AIM to ogun7 Send a message via Yahoo to ogun7
This would definitely hurt their relationship with other labels in the iTMS, but also explain why Universal started crying and ran home with their toys (music). Since Jay is (or was?) distributed by Universal, this definitely has to be a coup. Jay was already complaining last year about declining sales and many in the Hip-Hop community railed against him on how certain eagerly anticipated albums (Nas - Hip-Hop Is Dead) were pushed back for more commercial releases (Jay-Z - Kingdom Come). This digital label would solve most of that.
ogun7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:50 AM   #13
bluebomberman
macrumors 6502a
 
bluebomberman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Queens, NYC
I don't see why Apple would even want to think about having their own music label. And even if they want in on the action, doing so with Jay-Z -- a guy that gloats about his expensive lifestyle -- won't do much to change the image of the big labels as soulless corporate entities that exploit and steal from artists.

If Apple goes through with this, they're going to start looking a lot like Sony.
__________________
Treo 700p.
bluebomberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:51 AM   #14
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
disregarding whether you believe its true or not... would it really surprise people?

What better way to promote iTunes (and therefore iPod, iPhone) then digital only distribution of popular artists.

Now, it may piss off the record labels (which it may have pissed of Universal already), but do they have a choice but to distribute on iTunes?

And as for choice of artists... it makes sense to have young-demographic users. translation: people who are far more likely to be online.

arn
arn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:52 AM   #15
diotima1212
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2004
I don't get why people would rate this "negative". As we just saw with Universal, big Record Labels are not fit for the digital age, and they don't care for the experience of their consumers. To bypass them and offer a deal directly by Apple seems not only what many artists would wish, but rather necessary to get some independence of those dying behemoths.

By the way, FSJ hinted something like this lately, so it must be true....
diotima1212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:53 AM   #16
LoganT
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
It's the Apple in the building!

LoganT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:56 AM   #17
rob@robburns.co
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Universal and DRM

The strange thing is that Universal is trying to play hard-ball with Apple, when Apple is the only large music retailer selling music with DRM. Its like they want to shoot themselves in the foot. CD sales would be declining even faster than the already are if they playing field was equalized with respect to DRM (i.e., Apple has to include it while WaMart, Target and Best Buy do not).

As for Def Jam records, I wonder if more and more of these subsidiaries are going to think: "What do I need Universal for?" I could see this just opening the flood gates.
rob@robburns.co is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 04:59 AM   #18
ogun7
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Send a message via AIM to ogun7 Send a message via Yahoo to ogun7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yixian View Post
I'd rather see Apple in movies or games but it'd be good to see them branch out with a music label. This sort of thing would bring them better access to resources, and financially stabalise them even further so they can continue to try far out products.

But Jay-Z? Man, Def Jam is an institution, with an organic history. If Jay-Z were to leave it I'd rather him create something fresh, raw and true to hip hop.

But I guess now we have Blacksmith.
A new label with a former computer company that makes most of the tools that the artists of your genre and generation use to create and listen to music and that would digitally distribute your wares all over the world is fresh, raw and true to Hip-Hop!

I'm originally from the Bronx and Hip-Hop is about taking all these global cultural influences and forging into new mediums that democratically provide access to art and making art. We didn't have instruments and took our mouths and record players and made music. No paintbrushes or canvas and made all of NYC (and then the world) our art studio. This is just acknowledgment for the marketing force that Hip-Hop is.

By the way, what is Blacksmith?
ogun7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 05:01 AM   #19
Squareball
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
I think that this is an interesting idea. Apple knows a couple of things that the large media companies don't. One of them is that the future of media is digital. From movies to TV shows to music, all of these will be delivered digitally and on demand. iTunes has proven that people want to buy music online. So what's next? Helping people discover new music to further drive sales.

The idea is simple. Apple takes control of the content and sells it and GIVES SOME AWAY FREE to users of iTunes. People on iTunes can jump on every day and see what's new, get free tracks, buy exclusive new tracks and find new bands that are in the same genre as the bands they like.

The difference between an apple label and say BMG is that Apple can cut out the radio stations, MTV, etc and promote their bands through iTunes and any other way they see fit. They have a user base. They don't need MTV or corporate radio which are both failing markets now. Neither of those mediums are about new music anymore. They churn out the same crap every year and people are tired of it. MTV doesn't even play music videos very much anymore. It's a joke. The reason is that people just jump on YouTube now to watch videos, they don't need to watch MTV for 2 hours waiting for that new hot video to come on.

In a short attention span world, Apple can kick the asses of the big studios because they can keep costs low and promote in many ways online.

Just a thought. I don't know about this rumor however but I do think that it at least makes sense on the surface.
Squareball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 05:05 AM   #20
ogun7
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Send a message via AIM to ogun7 Send a message via Yahoo to ogun7
It's funny. The record labels hate that their retail channels are controlled by just a few companies: Walmart, Apple and the like, but want to limit access to music at the same time.
ogun7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 05:12 AM   #21
Chaszmyr
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chaszmyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Send a message via AIM to Chaszmyr
I realize that Apple Inc and Apple Corps settled, but given that settlement would Apple Inc actually be allowed to become/start a record label themselves?
Chaszmyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 05:13 AM   #22
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaszmyr View Post
I realize that Apple Inc and Apple Corps settled, but given that settlement would Apple Inc actually be allowed to become/start a record label themselves?
It would seem so
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/02/05apple.html

Quote:
Under this new agreement, Apple Inc. will own all of the trademarks related to “Apple” and will license certain of those trademarks back to Apple Corps for their continued use.
Seems the trademark is 100% Apple (Computer)'s to use.

arn
arn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 05:13 AM   #23
T'hain Esh Kelch
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Denmark
Send a message via ICQ to T'hain Esh Kelch Send a message via AIM to T'hain Esh Kelch Send a message via MSN to T'hain Esh Kelch
Phew... This is gonna have a huge impact on the industry if it goes through... And I certainly believe Apple is gonna make more enemies..
__________________
"There's no bigot like a religious bigot and there's no religion more fanatical than that espoused by Macintosh zealots." ~Martin Veitch, IT Week [31-01-2003]
T'hain Esh Kelch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 05:20 AM   #24
bluebomberman
macrumors 6502a
 
bluebomberman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Queens, NYC
Question: Won't this bring up anti-trust issues?

Another question: Isn't this selling out?

The big labels obviously will be disgusted, but I can also see a lot of indie labels and indie artists being very unhappy that one of their best outlets for reaching their fans is going the way of The Man. How can they compete against a Jay-Z fronted Apple music label for front page space on the iTunes store?
__________________
Treo 700p.
bluebomberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2007, 05:21 AM   #25
iris_failsafe
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via MSN to iris_failsafe
why would Apple do this, it doesn't make sense, Steve must know that having everything hurts Sony a lot as its record label opposes his tech branch all the time...
__________________
"My Mac name is Compi iii ] MacBook Pro 15/ Powermac G4 867Mhz/MacBook 1.83 Ghz.
Once you go Mac you Never go Back
iris_failsafe is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC