Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:37 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Seeds ZFS Read/Write Developer Preview 1.1 for Leopard



Apple has seeded version 1.1 of ZFS for Mac OS X to Developers this week. The preview updates a previous build released on June 26, 2007.

In the release notes, Apple confirms that the original release of Mac OS X Leopard (10.5) will only offer Read-Only ZFS. As a result, no ZFS pools or filesystems can be modified or created under 10.5.0. This developer's preview enables full read/write capability, including the creation/destruction of ZFS pools and filesystems.

ZFS is described as "a fundamentally new approach to data management. We've blown away 20 years of obsolete assumptions, eliminated complexity at the source, and created a storage system that's actually a pleasure to use."

The initial version of Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard is rumored to be released on October 26th, 2007. It's unclear when Leopard will incorporate full Read/Write ZFS support, but it seems clear that Apple is working on adding this functionality.

Article Link
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:40 PM   #2
DMann
macrumors Demi-God
 
DMann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 10023
Newsworthy

This is phenomenal! ZFS is here!!! This alone makes Leopard worth the upgrade. Read/Write will be developed down the road - this marks the beginning of ZFS.
__________________
Think Different - Innovate
DMann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:40 PM   #3
psychofreak
Retired
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Awesome! Hopefully in 10.6 it will be bootable default
psychofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:42 PM   #4
zwida
macrumors 6502a
 
zwida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychofreak View Post
Awesome! Hopefully in 10.6 it will be bootable default
I don't even want to try to get my brain around 10.6. 2009 at the earliest, right?
__________________
I'd prefer not to.
zwida is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:42 PM   #5
Cromulent
macrumors 68040
 
Cromulent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The British Empire
Sounds interesting. I like the fact that Apple are still following through with this. HFS+ is definitely reaching the end of it's useful life.
__________________
Neural Advance - Mac OS X, UNIX and Windows Development
Extreme Metal Reviews
MP 4x 2.66Ghz Xeons / 2GB RAM / 250GB + 500GB + 750GB + 1TB HDDs / Nvidia 8800GT 512MB
Cromulent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:42 PM   #6
bananas
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: at home, where ever.
I hope ZFS read/write support gets added to Leopard when it's ready. Not a moment earlier.

ZFS does sound like a cool filesystem.
__________________
MacBook Air 1,6 GHz 80 GB HDD W8811######
bananas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:45 PM   #7
spotlight07
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
So the Sun guy was telling the truth after all.
spotlight07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:45 PM   #8
Peace
macrumors Demi-God
 
Peace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On top of the Storm Peaks waiting for the Time-Lost Proto Drake
Quote:
Originally Posted by bananas View Post
I hope ZFS read/write support gets added to Leopard when it's ready. Not a moment earlier.

ZFS does sound like a cool filesystem.
I'm not gonna break my NDA but I will say it's fast as hell..
Peace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:46 PM   #9
psychofreak
Retired
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by bananas View Post
a cool filesystem.
Not three words you often see together
psychofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:47 PM   #10
RichP
macrumors 68000
 
RichP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Motor City
I wouldnt mind Leopard coming out the end of November if we could see ZFS in the initial release. It is going to be a big improvement to data management.
__________________
"My ultimate vocation in life is to be an irritant" – Elvis Costello
RichP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:51 PM   #11
boxlight
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
what will ZFS do for me?

Average iMac user here. What does ZFS do that I might notice -- will ZFS matter to me? Serious question.
boxlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:51 PM   #12
psychofreak
Retired
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichP View Post
I wouldnt mind Leopard coming out the end of November if we could see ZFS in the initial release. It is going to be a big improvement to data management.
If we waited for everything cool that shoulda/coulda/woulda been here by now, it will be ages until Leopard. I personally was hoping for a truly resolution independant scaleable OS, while others wanted that faster OS switching shown on the Apple website...
psychofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:52 PM   #13
pounce
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
yeah, i'd be all over having zfs. this could be a very good thing.
__________________
cheers,
paul
pounce international
www.paperstreetaudio.com
pounce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:54 PM   #14
QuarterSwede
macrumors 68030
 
QuarterSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxlight View Post
Average iMac user here. What does ZFS do that I might notice -- will ZFS matter to me? Serious question.
Not just a serious question but a very good one at that.
__________________
Help stop children from viewing internet pornography.
What happened to all the great leaders?
QuarterSwede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:55 PM   #15
dashiel
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
nice!

i think we'll see this used in airport disk and appleTV applications.
dashiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:56 PM   #16
Brendon Bauer
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Good 'ol USofA
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxlight View Post
Average iMac user here. What does ZFS do that I might notice -- will ZFS matter to me? Serious question.
I'm wondering the same thing. What's the difference/big deal?

I'm all for it if it's "new and cool"
__________________
15" SR Mackbook Pro 2.4Ghz with 4GB RAM, 160GB HD@7200 and GeForce 8600M GT w/256MB VRAM
running Mac OS 10.6 Snow Leopard
Brendon Bauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:57 PM   #17
brewno
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Send a message via AIM to brewno Send a message via Skype™ to brewno
It's gonna be one of those "One more thing.... ZFS is implemented and it's bootable".
__________________
Blog - Flickr
White iPhone | MBP 15" Matte 2.2 | iMac 24" 2.8 | 10.6.1 | Video iPod 60Gb | iPod Touch 8Gb | iPod HiFi | Canon XSi
brewno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 06:58 PM   #18
psychofreak
Retired
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewno View Post
It's gonna be one of those "One more thing.... ZFS is implemented and it's bootable".
I seriously doubt that...
psychofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 07:01 PM   #19
QuarterSwede
macrumors 68030
 
QuarterSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
10 Reasons to reformat your hard drives
__________________
Help stop children from viewing internet pornography.
What happened to all the great leaders?
QuarterSwede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 07:02 PM   #20
Brendon Bauer
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Good 'ol USofA
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewno View Post
It's gonna be one of those "One more thing.... ZFS is implemented and it's bootable".
I don't think we'll be hearing any "One more thing..."s anytime soon. At least none that are significant. Apple seems to have spread it's resources thin at the moment... Just my thought. I could be wrong, and I hope I am!
__________________
15" SR Mackbook Pro 2.4Ghz with 4GB RAM, 160GB HD@7200 and GeForce 8600M GT w/256MB VRAM
running Mac OS 10.6 Snow Leopard
Brendon Bauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 07:03 PM   #21
RRK
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA/Ohio/Columbus
Quote:
Originally Posted by spotlight07 View Post
So the Sun guy was telling the truth after all.
Sweet! That loose end bothered me.
__________________
Woz Signature Edition Apple IIgs, Power Macintosh 7100, 333mhz G3 iMac (rev. d), 1ghz 17" G4 iMac, 2.8ghz 24" Intel iMac
RRK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 07:05 PM   #22
sblasl
macrumors 6502a
 
sblasl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Heber Springs, AR
OK, I'll bite.

Just what is it that we will see in OS 10.5 as it relates to ZFS? If this is what is stated, than what do we get?

"In the release notes, Apple confirms that the original release of Mac OS X Leopard (10.5) will only offer Read-Only ZFS. As a result, no ZFS pools or filesystems can be modified or created under 10.5.0. This developer's preview enables full read/write capability, including the creation/destruction of ZFS pools and filesystems."
__________________
Pardon Multimedia - please give MM another chance!
sblasl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 07:06 PM   #23
rented mule
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychofreak View Post
I seriously doubt that...
My guess is that it's gonna find it's way into a point upgrade just like HFS+ Journaled did. Someone mentioned that the notes say that ZFS requires a GUID volume. Why would it require GUID if it's not bootable?
rented mule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 07:07 PM   #24
semireg
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brendon Bauer View Post
I'm wondering the same thing. What's the difference/big deal?

I'm all for it if it's "new and cool"
ZFS will make time machine faster and more usable by allowing snapshots at the filesystem level. You'll be able to plugin an external drive and zam, a few ZFS commands later and a full clone of your mac is made on the external drive. All of the snapshots in between backups can be time machined to.

Last edited by Doctor Q : Oct 4, 2007 at 08:40 PM. Reason: fixed typo
semireg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2007, 07:08 PM   #25
semireg
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
I'm positive that ZFS has, and always will be an integral part of time-machine. The reason it was "pulled" was because the thunder was stolen from Job's by the Sun exec. Always been there... nothing to see here.
semireg is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC