|
|
#1 |
|
SuperDuper vs. TimeMachine
if timemachine isn't bootable, then what's the entire point?
with superduper you can clone the entire drive and it's a perfect duplicate. ??? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Superduper doesn't give you a 'history' of your files that you can scroll back through.
__________________
Turns out they DO drink it in the Congo |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Even though the Time Machine backups aren't bootable, with a Leopard Install disc they can be restored completely to the drive.
__________________
MacBook Pro Early 2011 2.2GHz, 8GB RAM, 120GB Apple SSD iPhone 5 32GB iPad Early 2012 64GB Apple TV 3 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Carbon Copy Cloner works.
Time Machine is file recovery. CCC/SD! are bootable backups. We need both (for now).
__________________
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SuperDuper v Timemachine | Washac | Mac Applications and Mac App Store | 10 | Nov 3, 2011 06:55 PM |
| SuperDuper vs. Time Machine vs. Migration Assistant | chefwong | MacBook Pro | 4 | Feb 25, 2011 09:16 PM |
| SuperDuper vs Timemachine... | NStocks | Mac Applications and Mac App Store | 5 | Mar 24, 2009 08:38 PM |
| SuperDuper & TimeMachine | lugesm | Mac Applications and Mac App Store | 8 | Dec 5, 2007 08:51 PM |
| SuperDuper Vs Carbon CC Vs A.N. Other | DerChef | Mac Applications and Mac App Store | 3 | Feb 27, 2006 06:31 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.








Linear Mode

