Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 16, 2008, 08:56 PM   #1
steve31
macrumors 6502a
 
steve31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton Canada
Who here is getting a MBA with SSD HD?

Who is taking the "RED PILL" and buying a MBA with the solid state drive? Or am I the only one that's foolish? $1000.00 for next to no boot time!!!
__________________
1 2009 iMac i7 Quad Core
2 MacBook Air 2011 11.6/i7/4GB/128GB
3 iPad "New" 64 4G
4 Galaxy Note/1.4ghz dual=FAST
steve31 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 08:57 PM   #2
MK2007
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
No way. It's a complete waste of money. MBA has more potential than any device in Apple's history to be replaced by something else in a few months. Too many design shortcomings, too high a price.
MK2007 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 08:59 PM   #3
pr5owner
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve31 View Post
Who is taking the "RED PILL" and buying a MBA with the solid state drive? Or am I the only one that's foolish? $1000.00 for next to no boot time!!!
you will have the same boot time, an SSD does not mean a RAM drive, even RAM drives do not have instant boot times, you probably need a CACHE drive for that (cache transfers several terabytes per second, where as ram drives can do several gigabytes, and SSD's can do around 60MB/s, regular HDD's do around 40MB-70MB depending on where the disk is read from.

although it would be interesting to see 4 SSD's in raid 0.

BTW SSD's are on newegg for $1500 for the 64GB, cheaper on other online sites. theres even a 128GB for $3000 lol
__________________
Macus3r says "For each and every iPhone manufactured, i'm sure apple wants to keep a running record of all and any repairs... illegal repairs do not add to a manufactured unit's service history. "
pr5owner is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 09:07 PM   #4
steve31
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
steve31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr5owner View Post
you will have the same boot time, an SSD does not mean a RAM drive, even RAM drives do not have instant boot times, you probably need a CACHE drive for that (cache transfers several terabytes per second, where as ram drives can do several gigabytes, and SSD's can do around 60MB/s, regular HDD's do around 40MB-70MB depending on where the disk is read from.

although it would be interesting to see 4 SSD's in raid 0.

BTW SSD's are on newegg for $1500 for the 64GB, cheaper on other online sites. theres even a 128GB for $3000 lol
I have seen youtube video's comparing the ssd drive vs a standard hd and the boot time on the solid state is almost twice as fast. I guess I will find out in 2 weeks. I will compare it to my MBP boot time.
__________________
1 2009 iMac i7 Quad Core
2 MacBook Air 2011 11.6/i7/4GB/128GB
3 iPad "New" 64 4G
4 Galaxy Note/1.4ghz dual=FAST
steve31 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 09:25 PM   #5
diabolic
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
I ordered one with the SSD. I can't wait.
diabolic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 09:27 PM   #6
Danksi
macrumors 68000
 
Danksi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nelson, BC. Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve31 View Post
I have seen youtube video's comparing the ssd drive vs a standard hd and the boot time on the solid state is almost twice as fast.
Yeah, but we're only talking 20-30 seconds faster. During normal usage, you'd have to be hitting the drive all the time for it to be really worthwhile - wouldn't it'd be better to just max out the RAM?
__________________
Kootenay Mountain Biking
Danksi is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 09:29 PM   #7
durant0s
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve31 View Post
I have seen youtube video's comparing the ssd drive vs a standard hd and the boot time on the solid state is almost twice as fast. I guess I will find out in 2 weeks. I will compare it to my MBP boot time.
Compare it to your MBP? Sorry to get personnel, but why exactly are you getting an MBA?
durant0s is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 09:56 PM   #8
steve31
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
steve31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by durant0s View Post
Compare it to your MBP? Sorry to get personnel, but why exactly are you getting an MBA?
Thats what my wife said!! lol I need a small portable for travel and did not want to take my MBP with me so I bought a Blk MB for this but when ever I used it I missed the LED screen and love the backlit key pad the MBP has. So I sold my MB and ordered the MBA. I dont need the GPU or power for the road. Just a lighter machine! Having said that the MBA 1.8 core 2 duo is not that slow and pair it with a solid state drive and it should run close to the same as my MB. I know...sounds "crazy".
__________________
1 2009 iMac i7 Quad Core
2 MacBook Air 2011 11.6/i7/4GB/128GB
3 iPad "New" 64 4G
4 Galaxy Note/1.4ghz dual=FAST
steve31 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 10:05 PM   #9
Abstract
macrumors Penryn
 
Abstract's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Location Location
I don't get why some people say the MBA is underpowered, or slow. It's fast. I have a MB from June, and it has a C2D 2.0 GHz processor and 2 GB of RAM. The MBA has a C2D 1.6 or 1.8 GHz processor in it, and is much thinner. Smaller laptops have always had much less power than larger laptops. This is no different. In fact, I'm surprised at how powerful they made the MBA.
__________________
"Hard? It's supposed to be hard. Hard is what makes it great!" - Tom Hanks.
Abstract is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2008, 10:31 PM   #10
steve31
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
steve31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abstract View Post
I don't get why some people say the MBA is underpowered, or slow. It's fast. I have a MB from June, and it has a C2D 2.0 GHz processor and 2 GB of RAM. The MBA has a C2D 1.6 or 1.8 GHz processor in it, and is much thinner. Smaller laptops have always had much less power than larger laptops. This is no different. In fact, I'm surprised at how powerful they made the MBA.
I was also expecting a slower CPU! I am happy it has a 1.8ghz core2 duo
__________________
1 2009 iMac i7 Quad Core
2 MacBook Air 2011 11.6/i7/4GB/128GB
3 iPad "New" 64 4G
4 Galaxy Note/1.4ghz dual=FAST
steve31 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2008, 12:26 AM   #11
CrusaderKnight
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rock Island, IL
Send a message via AIM to CrusaderKnight
I'll be getting a MBA with a SSD also
__________________
8Gb Mini iPod
20"iMac Intel Core Duo now with Leopard 10.5.1
iPhone 8Gb
pre-order a MacBook Air
CrusaderKnight is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2008, 12:55 AM   #12
Paix247
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danksi View Post
Yeah, but we're only talking 20-30 seconds faster. During normal usage, you'd have to be hitting the drive all the time for it to be really worthwhile - wouldn't it'd be better to just max out the RAM?
you can add to, take out or even look at the RAM in the MBA.
Paix247 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2008, 12:58 AM   #13
mcvaughan
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
SSD 4 me!
__________________
Matt
MacBook Pro, ACD, iPod, iPad, iPhone, Airport Extreme, Apple TV
mcvaughan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2008, 01:13 AM   #14
HLdan
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abstract View Post
I don't get why some people say the MBA is underpowered, or slow.

It's not the processor they are complaining about it's the 4200rpm hard drive and there's no option for a 5400. I was at Macworld yesterday playing with it and it wasn't too bad in speed but iMovie took a while to launch and relaunch. The screen quality is incredible and I'll be getting the SSD model.
HLdan is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrading the 2011 MBA 11" - SATA3 SSD, yes!, but 2013 MBA battery? JPamplin MacBook Air 10 Sep 18, 2013 08:50 PM
Late 2012 MBA SSD & 2013 MBA SSD Interchangeability mfldmike MacBook Air 4 Jun 21, 2013 03:52 PM
2010 MBA SSD vs 2011 MBA SSD - Any Speed Difference? SSD-GUY MacBook Air 3 Oct 23, 2012 07:38 AM
Pop 2011 13" MBA SSD into 2012 MBA unixunderground MacBook Air 3 Jun 25, 2012 07:26 PM
Advice: New MBA 13" i5 SSD 128 GB or used MBA 13" i7 SSD 256 GB PureScotch MacBook Air 2 Jun 12, 2012 10:51 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC