Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Pro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 1, 2008, 10:31 PM   #1
lauph
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 30 mins from Cupertino
Difference between number of transistors of Merom VS Penryn.

I read somewhere that Merom has 293million transistors, while Penryn has 410million transistors.

So by transistor count alone Penryn has 40% more processing power than Merom. Adding to the 100MHz bump from 2.4 to 2.5, and the 3MB more L2 cahce, shouldn't the speed difference be way more than what the current reviews say?
lauph is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1, 2008, 11:08 PM   #2
frunty
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Des Moines, IA
The L2 cache increase makes up a lot of that increased transistor count. Additional enhancements to the chip architecture make up the rest. More processing power with less heat, definitely a winner!

Link
frunty is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1, 2008, 11:25 PM   #3
valvehead
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
The speed of the CPU has very little to do with the number of transistors. It depends on what those transistors are used for.

OK, let's break this down (someone please tell me if my calculations are wrong):
Typical SRAM cache uses six transistors per bit. There are eight bits per byte. Merom has 4MB cache, and Penryn has 6MB: an increase of 2MB or 2097152 Bytes.

2097152 Bytes * 8 bits/byte * 6 transistors per bit = 100663296 or about 100 million transistors.

So, if Penryn has 117 million more transistors than Merom, the vast majority of that difference is in the L2 cache. The reason why there is only a slight increase in performance is because the design of the CPU core is nearly the same. The new SSE4 instructions will significantly help only those programs that are written for them.
__________________
Early '08 MBP | 15" matte | 2.5GHz Penryn | 2GB | 200GB 7200 | OS X 10.6.4 | Win7 Pro x64
iPod | 4G Mono | 40GB
valvehead is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1, 2008, 11:46 PM   #4
lauph
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 30 mins from Cupertino
Quote:
Originally Posted by valvehead View Post
The speed of the CPU has very little to do with the number of transistors. It depends on what those transistors are used for.

OK, let's break this down (someone please tell me if my calculations are wrong):
Typical SRAM cache uses six transistors per bit. There are eight bits per byte. Merom has 4MB cache, and Penryn has 6MB: an increase of 2MB or 2097152 Bytes.

2097152 Bytes * 8 bits/byte * 6 transistors per bit = 100663296 or about 100 million transistors.

So, if Penryn has 117 million more transistors than Merom, the vast majority of that difference is in the L2 cache. The reason why there is only a slight increase in performance is because the design of the CPU core is nearly the same. The new SSE4 instructions will significantly help only those programs that are written for them.
So the 100million more transistors are just to accommodate the 50% increase in L2?

And so the performance gain is just due to the increase in L2 cache?

Last edited by Blue Velvet; Mar 2, 2008 at 11:05 AM. Reason: Please don't bump your own threads
lauph is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Pro

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPad: Does Part Number make a difference? ade1982 iPad 6 Mar 25, 2014 02:34 PM
Your Apple store order number is also your UPS reference number Gjwilly iPhone 0 Sep 23, 2013 09:36 AM
4S- Changed phone number, old number still shows up in messages dbabytro iPhone 4 Jul 18, 2013 01:58 PM
Serial number or phone number? davidra iPhone Tips, Help and Troubleshooting 1 Mar 13, 2013 10:04 PM
Does the storage difference justify the $$$ difference? Redjericho iPad 19 Jun 27, 2012 02:22 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC