Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mark88

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 30, 2004
509
0
Other than the screen size and the extra graphics power what else is the difference?

Seems these two machines are very close in terms of specs, price, build and looks.

I look forward to seeing benchmarks.
 

noisebleed

macrumors regular
Jul 11, 2008
140
0
firewire port, resolution and graphics.

uh, that's it ( but the last 2 is a big difference maker if you're a gamer )
 

mark88

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 30, 2004
509
0
I'm not a gamer, nor a firewire user.

Is there nothing else that makes the MBP version a faster machine other than the grahics?
 

G5power

macrumors 6502
Feb 25, 2005
253
0
In addition to the obvious larger screen. Don't forget that you can still get the "old" MBP without the glossy screen.

Also the fire wire port could be awfully useful in the future if you get an external drive for Time Machine.
 

sarah3585

macrumors regular
Aug 12, 2007
237
0
Is the macbook pro worth the extra £250?

For me I'm not sure, I will be hooking it up to a 20inch screen when needed. Spec-wise not much difference? not £250 worth anyway.
 

mark88

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 30, 2004
509
0
The new RAM is faster and so is the FSB.


MBP:

2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor with 3MB on-chip shared L2 cache running 1:1 with processor speed;
1066MHz frontside bus
2GB (two 1GB SO-DIMMs) or 4GB (two 2GB SO-DIMMs) of 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM; two SO-DIMM slots support up to 4GB

MB:

2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor with 3MB on-chip shared L2 cache running 1:1 with processor speed
1066MHz frontside bus
2GB (two 1GB SO-DIMMs) of 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM; two SO-DIMM slots support up to 4GB
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.