Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > Windows, Linux & others on the Mac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 4, 2008, 08:26 AM   #1
joelw135
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
VMwear or Parallels Desktop

Is there any speed difference between VMwear and Parallels Desktop? I have VMwear on my iMac and am running XP Pro which I installed through VM not Boot Camp, and my only program (Paint Shop Pro Photo X2 Ultimate) crawls along. I have 4GB of Ram installed on the iMac.
joelw135 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 08:46 AM   #2
JKitterman
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
How much memory do you have allocated in the virtual machine? Are you allowing both processors if you have dual core?
JKitterman is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 09:09 AM   #3
joelw135
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKitterman View Post
How much memory do you have allocated in the virtual machine? Are you allowing both processors if you have dual core?
I have 3GB allocated and have one processor chosen. What should I have it set for, and can I still have Thunderbird and Firefox still loaded in the OSX environment?
joelw135 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:04 AM   #4
ayeying
macrumors 601
 
ayeying's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Yay Area, CA
Send a message via AIM to ayeying
Quote:
Originally Posted by joelw135 View Post
I have 3GB allocated and have one processor chosen. What should I have it set for, and can I still have Thunderbird and Firefox still loaded in the OSX environment?
Don't need to allocate that much. Use at most 2GB for Guest.
__________________
MacBook Pro 13" | 3.0GHz Core i7, 8GB DDR3L, 512GB SSD, Intel HD 4000 768MB, Retina, 10.8.3, 8 Core x64
Samsung Galaxy S4 | 16GB, White, AT&T, 4.2.2
iPad Mini | 32GB, White, AT&T, iOS 6.1.3
ayeying is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:08 AM   #5
joelw135
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ayeying View Post
Don't need to allocate that much. Use at most 2GB for Guest.
OK 2Gb but how many processors?
joelw135 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:16 AM   #6
ayeying
macrumors 601
 
ayeying's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Yay Area, CA
Send a message via AIM to ayeying
Quote:
Originally Posted by joelw135 View Post
OK 2Gb but how many processors?
Just 1 is enough. I don't see a real need to use 2. If you want really good speed, boot camp is the way to go.
__________________
MacBook Pro 13" | 3.0GHz Core i7, 8GB DDR3L, 512GB SSD, Intel HD 4000 768MB, Retina, 10.8.3, 8 Core x64
Samsung Galaxy S4 | 16GB, White, AT&T, 4.2.2
iPad Mini | 32GB, White, AT&T, iOS 6.1.3
ayeying is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:20 AM   #7
sangosimo
macrumors 6502a
 
sangosimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
virtual box.
__________________

:flickr \\ photos
:twitter \\sangosimo
sangosimo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:22 AM   #8
Lurchdubious
macrumors 65816
 
Lurchdubious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Gem State
Send a message via AIM to Lurchdubious
weird. I have fusion running XP with only 512 RAM allocated & it runs absolutely fine. Much better than Parallels, in fact.
__________________
iPhone 5 64GB
32 GB 3rd Gen iPad
13" MB Air 1.7GHz i5
13" 2.4 Ghz Unibody MB, ATV2: Assorted iPods
Lurchdubious is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:26 AM   #9
Mr Rogerss
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
It was always my understanding that VMwear was the more simple VM and it was recommended to me if I didn't have the 4 gig option in my MBP.

I was told to only get parallels if i had the power to run it.

Sounds like VM might be more known for speed for most people.
Mr Rogerss is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:37 AM   #10
ChrisA
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by joelw135 View Post
Is there any speed difference between VMwear and Parallels Desktop? I have VMwear on my iMac and am running XP Pro which I installed through VM not Boot Camp, and my only program (Paint Shop Pro Photo X2 Ultimate) crawls along. I have 4GB of Ram installed on the iMac.
Why are you bothering with Paint Shop Pro? There are some very good image editors that run native under Mac OS X. Just get Adobe Photoshop Elements and be done with Windows.

In general, most Windows software runs at near native speed in VMware but the exception is graphical stuff, like games and (I guess, Paint Shop Pro) The best soltion is to find a native Mac program that will do what you want. In this case it's easy.
ChrisA is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:39 AM   #11
joelw135
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurchdubious View Post
weird. I have fusion running XP with only 512 RAM allocated & it runs absolutely fine. Much better than Parallels, in fact.
I can't figure out what the problem is! There seems to be delays every time I click the mouse on the pictures directory, and processing seems slow. I am now trying with 1 processor and 2500 Gb of ram.
joelw135 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:42 AM   #12
Lurchdubious
macrumors 65816
 
Lurchdubious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Gem State
Send a message via AIM to Lurchdubious
Quote:
Originally Posted by joelw135 View Post
I can't figure out what the problem is! There seems to be delays every time I click the mouse on the pictures directory, and processing seems slow. I am now trying with 1 processor and 2500 Gb of ram.
Yeah I don't know man. I was thinking maybe it was cuz of the graphics thing, but I run a program for school that has quite a lot of graphics-type stuff and it doesn't really affect performance.
__________________
iPhone 5 64GB
32 GB 3rd Gen iPad
13" MB Air 1.7GHz i5
13" 2.4 Ghz Unibody MB, ATV2: Assorted iPods
Lurchdubious is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:52 AM   #13
joelw135
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisA View Post
Why are you bothering with Paint Shop Pro? There are some very good image editors that run native under Mac OS X. Just get Adobe Photoshop Elements and be done with Windows.

In general, most Windows software runs at near native speed in VMware but the exception is graphical stuff, like games and (I guess, Paint Shop Pro) The best soltion is to find a native Mac program that will do what you want. In this case it's easy.
The problem is that I have a huge amount of money invested in plugins and filters for the Windows environment. Also Elements does not handle layers well at all.
joelw135 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 01:59 PM   #14
jzuena
macrumors 6502a
 
jzuena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Burlington, MA, USA
It should only be 3D graphics that slow down a virtual machine in VMware or Parallels. You may actually have too much memory allocated to your virtual machine, causing OS X to have to do a lot of swapping. I use 1 GB of memory (out of my MBP 4 GB total) for Windows XP Pro and it runs fine. On my home machine I use 512 MB of memory (out of 2 GB total) and even that runs fine. I run VMware Fusion now, but ran Parallels in the past with similar results.
__________________
Pilot, greyhound walker, retired bartender extraordinaire.
jzuena is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 02:20 PM   #15
adrian.oconnor
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nottingham, England
I found VMWare was a bit rubbish until I disabled 3D in the Display settings. After that it was great. Try changing that and see how it goes.

I've used both VMWare and Parallels for some quite intensive stuff (I'm a windows programmer by day). have found VMWare to be the better of the two in terms of performance and quality. The only thing Parallels does better is hide the Mac menu bar in full screen (full screen is nice if you use spaces with hot-keys enabled). I can't understand why VMWare doesn't at least have the option to hide the menu bar.

As for processors and RAM, I say use a single CPU and go for 2GB. You don't want to starve OS X of memory and having one core for Windows and one for Mac works out well in practice. Make sure your VMWare is up-to-date too.

If after all of that you're still slow, check the process monitor in Windows - maybe something there is causing the virtual machine to get bogged down?
adrian.oconnor is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 02:50 PM   #16
joelw135
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrian.oconnor View Post
I found VMWare was a bit rubbish until I disabled 3D in the Display settings. After that it was great. Try changing that and see how it goes.

I've used both VMWare and Parallels for some quite intensive stuff (I'm a windows programmer by day). have found VMWare to be the better of the two in terms of performance and quality. The only thing Parallels does better is hide the Mac menu bar in full screen (full screen is nice if you use spaces with hot-keys enabled). I can't understand why VMWare doesn't at least have the option to hide the menu bar.

As for processors and RAM, I say use a single CPU and go for 2GB. You don't want to starve OS X of memory and having one core for Windows and one for Mac works out well in practice. Make sure your VMWare is up-to-date too.

If after all of that you're still slow, check the process monitor in Windows - maybe something there is causing the virtual machine to get bogged down?
I just switched to 1 GB of ram and it seems a little better. What bothers me is that when I shut XP down then change the ram allocation and restart XP the scary blue screen asking if I want to start windows in safe mode or normal mode. I think VMware isn't closing down XP properly.
joelw135 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 06:44 PM   #17
Bmode
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKitterman View Post
How much memory do you have allocated in the virtual machine? Are you allowing both processors if you have dual core?
How do you differentiate or assign the processors? In my Duo Intel 4GRAM MBP, I have 2GB for Parallels to run, so does it automatically use the other 2GB to run the Mac OS in the background?

Regarding the slow issue, what I do is close the screen and wait a minute or two, then it comes back up running at normal speeds.
Bmode is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2008, 07:25 PM   #18
joelw135
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmode View Post
How do you differentiate or assign the processors? In my Duo Intel 4GRAM MBP, I have 2GB for Parallels to run, so does it automatically use the other 2GB to run the Mac OS in the background?

Regarding the slow issue, what I do is close the screen and wait a minute or two, then it comes back up running at normal speeds.
When you say close the screen, do you shut down or suspend the application?
joelw135 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 12:32 AM   #19
Bmode
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California, USA
Sorry, that was a lame response on my part. Leave the app running, and close the screen, quick sleep mode if you will. Some say to wait for the sleep white light indicator to repeat 3 times, but it works for me after about :20 seconds.
Bmode is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 06:06 AM   #20
joelw135
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmode View Post
Sorry, that was a lame response on my part. Leave the app running, and close the screen, quick sleep mode if you will. Some say to wait for the sleep white light indicator to repeat 3 times, but it works for me after about :20 seconds.
Please explain how to do what you said as I am new to iMac and OSX. Thanks.
joelw135 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > Windows, Linux & others on the Mac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parallels Desktop Problem Booting JJMartinez Windows, Linux & others on the Mac 3 Jun 27, 2011 04:49 PM
Parallels on MBP jocko87 MacBook Pro 13 Apr 20, 2011 11:19 AM
Parallels Desktop - SSD RAID or just 2xSSD? subzero Mac OS X 0 Feb 26, 2011 05:28 AM
Parallels vs. Fusion (11.6") Rezox MacBook Air 9 Nov 9, 2010 05:11 PM
VMware Fusion 3 or Parallels Desktop 5 hansie Windows, Linux & others on the Mac 5 Dec 21, 2009 09:12 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC