Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

cluthz

macrumors 68040
Original poster
I've been looking on the new iMacs the lasts couple of days, and this was really shocking!
The tech spec on the 17" display is sooo horible, it reminds me of lcd screens many years ago. Apple list the viewing angle 120°/90°, the 20" is 170°/170°.
Atleast apple are being honest about it....
The 20" viewing angle i actually good, but the 17" is an another story...
The brigthtness was ok on the 17" inch and a little better on the 20".
Wonder what response time those displays has..
 
Yeah, the 17" doesn't have very good viewing angles. However, I don't know about you, but I never look at my computer screen at any other angle other than straight on. I think the LCD's are fine and shouldn't really prevent anyone from buying the 20" over the 17" just for that reason.

JOD8FY
 
Because the 20" is much bigger than the 17"? It's said the 17" uses older panel, while the 20" uses newer.

Response time for 20" could be around 16ms. 17" is likely 25ms.
 
I believe that both of them use the screens that were in the previous generation of apple cinema displays. Since the 20" model was newer than the 17" in that line, it stands to reason that the 20" imac would have those better specs. I don't think that should be an absolute bar to buying the 17" though, just another factor to consider.
 
I don't think you really can judge a screen by the specs. I have seen displays with good specs but mediocre image quality. The only fair way to compare would be side by side, and to read professional tests and users experiences.
 
QCassidy352 said:
I believe that both of them use the screens that were in the previous generation of apple cinema displays.
umm...they never made a 17" widescreen cinema display, just the 4:3 studio one. the 17" imac uses the same screen from the previous 17" imac and the 17" pb.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.