Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

celebrian23

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Mar 12, 2006
1,186
0
Under the sun
an upgrade on my future mbp (base model). I don't know much about the technical side of computers, so would it be more beneficial to

1. upgrade memory to 1GB 667 DDR2, 2 X 512 SO-DIMMs from the 512 MB 667 DDR2 1 SO DIMM

or

2.upgrade hard drive to 100GB from 80GB

Thanks
 

Peyton

macrumors 68000
Feb 2, 2006
1,615
0
I'd definitely go with the ram, 20gb really isn't that much of a difference (unless you're going to a 7200rpm HDD) if you need the space, buy an external with alot more than 20gb, for a lot less. Buy the ram. :cool:
 

Peyton

macrumors 68000
Feb 2, 2006
1,615
0
NEENAHBOY said:
As someone who's not a fan of external hard drives and frequently exceeds the space on his 80GB PowerBook, I say go for the hard drive.

I don't like external drives either but if you want bang for your buck I'd go with the ram. IMO
 

Koodauw

macrumors 68040
Nov 17, 2003
3,951
190
Madison
you can always upgrade the ram later, the HD can be too, but is much more work.

However, i think the Ram will make more of a difference now.
 

celebrian23

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Mar 12, 2006
1,186
0
Under the sun
I will be using this mbp for about 4 years, which is why I was wondering if maybe it'd be worth it in the long run to add the hard drive space. What kind of a difference will I see from 512MB to 1GB?
 

Peyton

macrumors 68000
Feb 2, 2006
1,615
0
Search it in the forums but Macs love ram. Some people were saying they could see some apps twice as fast, 512 will get the job down but 1 gb will make it a lot snappier.
 

discoforce

macrumors 6502a
Jan 27, 2004
575
0
Vermont, USA
[chanting vikings]

Lovely ram, wonderful ra-a-m,
Lovely ram, wonderful ram,
Ra-a-A-a-A-a-A-am,
Ra-a-A-a-A-a-A-am,
RA-A-A-A-A-A-A-AM,
RA-A-A-A-A-A-A-AM,
LOVELY ram, LOVELY ram,
LOVELY ram, LOVELY ram,
LOVELY RA-A-A-A-AM...
RA-AM, RA-AM, RA-AM, RA-A-A-AM!

[/chanting vikings]

(With humblest apologies to Monty Python)

Ahem, I'd pick the Ram myself :)
 

asherman13

macrumors 6502a
Jul 31, 2005
914
0
SF Bay Area, CA
ieani said:
512, from everything I read is bare minimum to run OSX Tiger.

Tiger can run on a minimum of 256MB of RAM; I ran it on my iBook G3 with 384MB and it was pretty good, until my HDD died.

I say upgrade the HDD, but only if you think you might need the space in the future. RAM is a snap to upgrade, while an HDD upgrade is costly, hard to do yourself, and might (I'm not sure) void your warranty since you're opening up and modifying a part of the machine that isn't meant to be opened up and modified by the end user.
 

celebrian23

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Mar 12, 2006
1,186
0
Under the sun
I think I'll go for the HD then. It seems like more space would be better for me right now, and when I have the money I can add RAM.

Thanks :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.