Congrats. Hope it works out well for you
Thanks... I think it will. The only potential downside is that I went from having the Samsung SSD to the Toshiba (from 128GB samsung -> 256GB Toshiba). I actually hadn't been all that concerned about it, but whilst looking at some other things, saw the figures in the Anand review, and was quite unpleasantly shocked. One of the tests (the 4KB random read) showed that the Toshiba is slower than the Samsung by a factor of more than ten!
(2.49MB/s vs 27.2MB/s) The test in which the two were the closest showed that the Toshiba was about 30% slower than the Samsung. Will these differences be likely to have a noticeable or major impact on actual performance of the machine? If so, what sorts of activities are likely to see the greatest differences and what are the differences likely to be? I have read through some of the threads on this, but can't find much about whether it will actually be likely to make a difference in terms of actual performance as seen by the user.
I want to believe that they are both good quality, fast SSDs and that Apple would not use slower parts knowing that this will adversely impact on the performance seen by their customers. However, I also know that people pay very good money to replace the standard SSDs with higher performance models, so there has to be some clear benefit in doing so.
Any comments?
Just speaking generally, though, I have to say the the MacBook Air 11in is just perfect to take to uni. Semester 2 just started here this week (in Sydney, Australia) and it really is ideal as a uni laptop. I have an old (around 3 yrs??) ASUS Eee PC. It's one of the very early ones they made; I think it might have been the second version they released, after the initial 7in linux one that started it all (the one in question is 9in and came with Windows XP loaded along with 12GB of storage (i.e. one 8GB drive and one 4GB drive - which was actually a disaster, since the 4GB drive was set as the windows drive and it was just too small once you install an update or two)). Whilst its footprint is slightly smaller than the 11in MBA, it's far bulkier, only very slightly lighter (I seem to recall the weight being listed as around 0.99kg vs the 1.08kg of the MBA 11in), ridiculously slow, forever giving low disc space warnings and had much poorer battery life. I'd actually all but entirely given up using it at uni (and almost everywhere else) since it was almost always more of a hassle than it was worth. It would take forever to boot, then to do anything was painfully slow (the flash drive being so full really didn't seem to help this, but nor did the awfully slow CPU and paltry amount of RAM (1GB, IIRC)) and finally take forever to shut down. In contrast, the MBA boots in less than 20s from a cold start, is extremely nimble in all tasks I'm ever going to require of it and could handle plenty more and shuts down completely in a couple of seconds. I can honestly say that it is easily the best computer - by a wide margin - of any type (desktop, laptop, ultraportable/tablet/PDA) or size I have ever owned. It's been quite a long time since I was so excited about a computer. I'm sure that this is partly due to it being the first mac I've had, but it's much more than that, too.
Wow... that ended up a LOT longer than I intended.